Some Thoughts On Desecration Of Flags

Now, Section 700 of Title 18, the U.S. Criminal Codes, applies to desecration of the ‘United States Flag’, with some vague language about physical abuse.  And 47 States still have laws on the books about desecration of their State Flags.

If I were a Southern Gentleman, I would lobby my State Legislature to pass a State Law making use and display of the Confederate Flag by Hate Groups (Neo-Nazis, Anti-Blacks, Anti-Gay, Anti-Jew, Etc.) in any of their marches, rallies, gatherings, store-fronts, etc. a crime punishable by fines, imprisonment, or both.  Why let them ‘hide behind’ the Confederate Flag?

Very simple.

And, PLEASE South Carolina, and other Southern States and communities–when the Stars And Stripes are lowered to half mast, you LOWER THE STARS AND BARS TOO!

Very simple.

And let all the goddamn Nazi Groups use the Swastika Flag, instead of hiding behind the Confederate and U.S. Flags.  SO EVERYONE WILL KNOW WHAT THEY’RE ALL ABOUT!

What do you folks think?

Peter Buknatski

Montpelier, Vt.

Landmark Water Bill Signed

I attended Part Two of the H.35 bill signing on the dock at Saint Albans Bay last night. It was great to see a small crowd gathered, in spite of the recent rainy weather that prevented Gov. Shumlin from making a grand entrance by boat, as was planned.

Friends of Northern Lake Champlain Executive Director Denise Smith took some well-deserved kudos and at the same time cautioned that the work has just begun. She closed her remarks with an admonishment for manure-spreading farmers and lawn-fertilizing homeowners alike,

Just because something has always been, does not mean that it always has to be.

Mayor Liz Gamache and the Governor both talked about the collaboration between parties, committees and various constituencies that made the bill possible. Larry Jarvis spoke as a member of the Farmer’s Watershed Alliance and seemed stunned that so much progress was possible this year.

When you go down to Montpelier and you sit in these committee rooms, people really listen to what you have to say.

I would add, especially if you are a representative of a big agricultural operation. With all of the high-fives and hugs going around it was hard not to feel that a clean lake is just around the corner. Denise Smith made sure to remind us that a lengthy rule-making process was still ahead. I’ve also heard from one former legislator that the funds raised in H.35 are really only a quarter of what the need is annually for the next decade to get Lake Champlain back to acceptable phosphorous levels. Couple that with the fact that Lake Champlain won’t get all of the Clean Water Fund monies and we may not see a big change in water quality in the long run.

I’m also concerned about giving a lot of kudos to folks who fought hard for less funding, or drastic cuts to other conservation efforts as the bill made its way through the legislature. Reps. Corey Parent and Lynn Dickinson were there, and they fought hard to cut the funding from the Vermont Housing Conservation Board budget and redirect it to Lake clean-up. Senator Dustin Degree was even holding a Lake Carmi organizations’ sign as he stood beside Governor Shumlin at the podium. He fought against Act 138, which was the predecessor to this bill. It’s great to see that he’s come around on this environmental issue, but I don’t know that I feel all warm and fuzzy about giving any credit to the late-comers to the party.

Still, this is a big step and will fund a lot of much-needed projects as well as enforcement. Let’s hope it’s just the first step and not the last. Otherwise we really won’t see clean water in Saint Albans Bay. When the algae blooms are a thing of the past, that will be something to celebrate!

Rock Against Republicans

Candidates of both political parties like to have rock music playing at their rallies for obvious reasons. Rock is the music of millions of Americans, it has energy, it evokes a certain forward-looking vision, it connects with young people, it is culturally inclusive, and it implies that the candidate is not part of the Establishment.

 

In other words, rock is everything that Republicans are not. Still, they keep trying their own version of cultural appropriation by choosing rousing rock anthems to warm up the crowd, and once again, the musician who recorded that rock anthem told the Republican to get lost.

 

Today it was Neil Young. Today The Donald and that dead weasel on his head announced his candidacy for president to the tune of Neil Young's Rockin' in the Free World.

 

And just as fast, Neil Young told The Donald to get bent. “Donald Trump’s use of ‘Rockin’ in the Free World’ was not authorized,” Roberts said, adding for good measure, “Mr. Young is a longtime supporter of Bernie Sanders.”

 

And, as usual, the candidate missed the entire point of the song.

 

Other examples:

 

Just a couple of months ago it was the Dropkick Murpheys and Scott Walker. New York (AFP) – The Dropkick Murphys, the Boston rockers known for their left-wing politics, have voiced outrage after union-busting Governor Scott Walker of Wisconsin played their music at a conservative forum.


“Please stop using our music in any way. We literally hate you!!! Love, Dropkick Murphys,” the band tweeted over the weekend.

 

It was also Rage Against the Machine when Paul Ryan tried to appropriate their music. As the band's Tom Morello wrote in Rolling Stone: Don't mistake me, I clearly see that Ryan has a whole lotta “rage” in him: A rage against women, a rage against immigrants, a rage against workers, a rage against gays, a rage against the poor, a rage against the environment. Basically the only thing he's not raging against is the privileged elite he's groveling in front of for campaign contributions.

 

The list goes on and on, but maybe we should confine ourselves to the list of music that Republicans should use for their rallies: Hank Williams, Jr., who said  “We've got a Muslim president who hates farming, hates the military, hates the U.S. and we hate him!”

 

Ted Nugent, who said of President Obama  “I have obviously failed to galvanize and prod, if not shame enough Americans to be ever vigilant not to let a Chicago communist raised communist educated communist nurtured subhuman mongrel like the ACORN community organizer gangster Barack Hussein Obama to weasel his way into the top office of authority in the United States of America.”. 

 

What about you? If the Republicans must play music at their rallies, what is your ideal Republican playlist?

No end in sight for McAllister’s reign of shame

Attention: Franklin County readers:

There has been a vacuum of effective leadership demonstrated since we learned of Norm McAllister’s alleged offenses and very real remarks.

I know that a petition has been created, by a private citizen, to remove Norm McAllister from his seat in the legislature; but, as far as I know, it is only available on Facebook.

I have deliberately never joined Facebook and I am certain that others are in the same position as I, of being unable to use the Facebook petition but still wishing to register their objection to Mr. McAllister’s continued claim to the title of ‘Senator from Franklin County.”

For their benefit (and my own), I have drafted the following language which may be copied into a letter or an e-mail and sent to both Senate Pro Tem John Campbell and Lieutenant-Governor Phil Scott.  

“I, the undersigned, being a registered voter in Franklin County, Vermont, do hereby petition the Senate to immediately revoke from Norm McAllister the title, responsibilities and privileges of a state senator.

This petition is not based on any pre-judgement of Mr. McAllister’s guilt under the criminal code for crimes of which he is accused; rather, it is a response to Mr. McAllister’s known violation of his oath of office, based on the official record of Mr. McAllister’s remarks as captured by the State’s Attorney of Franklin County.

Every day that Mr. McAllister is allowed to retain his senate seat is a violation of the rights of his constituents to have effective and unassailable representation of their interests before the senate.”

Women voters might wish to add the following:

“Considering the nature of his recorded remarks alone, and the repellant attitudes that they reflect, his continued privilege in the senate is particularly insensitive and offensive to female constitutents.”

You may find it simpler to contact Mr. Campbell through the interface on his contact page, but, according to the legislative website, Mr. Campbell’s home email address is the following:  vt13@aol.com

I don’t see any way to contact the Lieutenant Governor by e-mail other than to fill in a form provided on his official website, which is what I did.

I hope this will help some other folks to make their voices heard in this extremely important effort to reclaim the dignity of Franklin County.

This is just vile

UPDATE: Diane Rehm has apologized.  

 

You can judge for yourself if it is adequate. Personally, I feel that she's letting herself off pretty easy, given that her question was the equivalent to asking if it's true that Jews use the blood of gentile babies to make matzohs. 

 

Cross posted from Rational Resistance

 

Or I should say, incompetent, sloppy journalism repeating a vile lie.

 

 

 

I like the Diane Rehm Show. She has good guests and she is generally a good, well-informed interviewer, but today she went way out of bounds.

 

I didn't hear the show myself, but Talking Points Memo reports that in the middle of her interview of Bernie Sanders she asked him this:

 

“Senator, you have dual citizenship with Israel,” Rehm said during the interview on her nationally broadcast show based on station WAMU.


. . .


Rehm cited “a list we have gotten” at NPR that said Sanders was “on that list.”


Sanders dismissed it as “nonsense that goes on in the Internet.”


(Rehm's station WAMU did not immediately return TPM's request for comment on Wednesday.)


“Are there members of Congress who do have dual citizenship or is that part of the fable?” Rehm asked Sanders.

 

It's true, there is a list on the Internet of members of Congress with dual citizenship. As you might expect, it is a vile, anti-Semitic lie. It repeats the canard that American Jews are not really Americans, and their loyalty cannot be trusted because their true allegiance is to Israel. Kind of funny that even though the media love to trace the genealogy that connects any particular president to the English royal family we never heard claims that George Bush or Ronald Reagan had dual citizenship with England, did we? No, it's always Israel and it's pretty much always Democrats.

 

When Bernie first announced I got on one of the very first Sanders for President Facebook pages and I soon left after I realized that a high percentage, maybe half, of the posts there were claims that he is a dual citizen.

 

This is just intolerable. As many awards as Diane Rehm has, she has to know better than to regurgitate this kind of anti-Semitic garbage. I haven't seen a retraction on her page yet, so when I'm done with this I'm going over to lodge a complaint. I hope you will, too.

 

Oh, and in case you're wondering, if you hear someone complaining about how the Rothschilds are running the world, that person's an anti-Semite, too.

 

The Republican War on Education

Republicans are funny. In their own antisocial way, that is.

 

When you get them talking about politics, and about the differences between the parties, you can't shut them up about the value of education, and how being all smart and educated makes them better than Democrats. They love to point out the differences in educational attainment between Democratic and Republican voters. Ol' Rushbo loves to attack what he calls the “low-information voters”, by which I'm pretty sure he means black people who vote for Democrats. In fact, education is so important to the Republicans, and conservatives in general, that the ur-text of the modern conservative movement is William F. Buckley's God and Man at Yale, where he upholds the sacred values of education against the political perversion of the academy.

 

But, as I say, they're funny. Somewhere after William F. Buckley was a lone, foaming-at-the-mouth conservative standing athwart history yelling, “Stop,” and the present, where the whole Republican Party is foaming at the mouth, their attitude toward education took a radical turn. To be specific, they used to be for it, now they're against it.

 

Developments in the last week or two have made this painfully clear, and I'll just mention a couple of them.

 

Wisconsin. For many years, probably owing to its Progressive history, Wisconsin has been the only state to enshrine the principle of tenure for public university faculties in its statutes. That won't last long, as Governor and likely presidential candidate Scott Walker got a legislative committee to repeal that statutory provision. Because Walker has a right-wing supermajority in the legislature, count on that repeal becoming law very soon.

 

 

Wisconsin. Walker again. This time it's not just attacking academic freedom and protections for professors, Walker is also pushing $300 million in cuts from the state's public universities while asking for $500 million to give the Milwaukee Bucks a new stadium.

 

Wisconsin. Still Walker. This time it's a proposal to gut teacher licensing standards. Anyone with a bachelor's degree could teach core subjects from grades six through twelve, no advance degree or specialized education required. And it gets better: for non-core subjects, no college required!

 

Is it fair to pick on one state so much? Maybe not, but with Walker's own undistinguished education (dropped out of Marquette with a 2.6–in other words, passing, barely–GPA) maybe we shouldn't be surprised that he places little value on education for others.

 

Nevada. New rule in Nevada: Who needs public schools? Take your voucher and go wherever you want. Want to send your kids to a fundamentalist school where they'll learn that the universe was created in six days, six thousand years ago? Well, there go your tax dollars right along with it. We'll see how that stands up to a constitutional challenge.

 

Texas. You know what William Tecumseh Sherman said about Texas, don't you? “If I owned Hell and Texas, I'd rent out Texas and live in Hell.” Things haven't gotten any better. Now, when your kids study history in the Texas public schools they will learn that Moses was one of our Founding Fathers. Yes, that Moses. The one with the burning bush. Since it's Texas we're talking about, maybe it was a tumbleweed.

 

North Carolina. (Motto: Not as bad as South Carolina!) Budget cuts, tuition increases, and attacks on academic centers based explicitly on political ideology. Will there be anything left of higher education in North Carolina once the John William Pope Center, the Tarheel version of the Koch brothers, gets done with it?

 

Kansas. Last but not least. It's a little older news, but it's breathtaking in the sheer audacity of the program. You know that Sam Brownback has been working for his entire tenure as governor to undermine and abolish any beneficial government activity, hoping to prove that if he cuts enough taxes on enough rich people the economy will perk back up. It hasn't happened yet, but in Brownback's mind that just means that he hasn't cut enough for long enough. The collateral damage? Hardly anything worth mentioning. They just had to shut down public schools in Kansas early because the government doesn't have the money to keep them open! Is that even possible? Forget about the dislocation for the families, who now must make other arrangements for their children while the parents are working, did it even occur to them that what goes on in schools is actually important? Apparently not.

 

Louisiana. Believe it or not, Bobby Jindal is a Rhodes scholar. Still, in Louisiana public school teachers are being allowed, encouraged, and pressured to teach that creationism is a valid explanation for the millions of species on earth. The parents must be hoping that when their kids graduate from high school they can get accepted to one of those many fine universities that “don't hold with book-larnin'”.

 

I could go on, but it's really too discouraging. For instance, I'm not even going to get into global warming. We are brought to a point where the parties aren't even seeing the same world. How is it possible to have any kind of debate or discussion when one of the parties is so militantly opposed to reality and facts?

 

The Republican attacks on education are a direct attack on the future. As long as this goes on they won't need Buckley to stand athwart the future. It's a good thing, because they're going to have a hard time finding someone who knows what “athwart” means.

What now, Phase Two

tDespite what we're hearing in the media, The biggest question that faces outgoing governor Peter Shumlin is probably now whether he can be effective working with the legislature in 2016.

No, the biggest challenges he is facing, and they start right now, are in the executive branch.

This week Paul Dupre, who has been the commissioner of the Department of Mental Health for two years, will be retiring.  

So what now?

Is there anything to talk about besides Peter Shumlin's bombshell tonight?

For weeks all anybody's said to me about him, in more or less favorable terms, is that he would never be able to stomach going out a loser, so he's got to run again to prove that he can make the comeback and go out on top.

So much for that. If you hang around long enough you should know that nothing's inevitable, no matter how smart you think you are.

One thing we do know, though, is that the 2016 campaign starts now. All the could-bes and should-bes who think they have to take their shot are no longer in a position to say that they'll wait until after the 2016 legislative session ends to make their decision, which is exactly what Shap Smith said just three days ago on You Can Quote Me. Anyone who waits that long will be too late. 

The governor's decision has changed the landscape completely, and has vastly strengthened the position of the Vermont Democrats. Just think about it: the conventional wisdom has been that Phil Scott is ready to run, and after some serious injuries this year, many of them self-inflicted, Shumlin was looking like an extremely vulnerable incumbent. Now, with Shumlin stepping aside and 2016 looking like a strong year for Democrats in Vermont–especially if Bernie is the candidate–the path to victory for any Republican is very much less clear than it was. In 2014 the Republicans almost disproved that time-honored truism that you can't beat somebody with nobody, but 2016 is not looking like a year they can pull it off again. In addition, a Shumlin candidacy was going to guarantee a Progressive candidate for governor next year, which would be a big boost for the R's, but now we may not see that.

So who are the candidates and what are the odds?

Shap Smith. Oh yeah, he's in. I say 80% chance and he announces in 2015. On the other hand, he has young kids and I can't remember the last time someone made the jump directly from the Legislature to governor, but he is the only person under the Dome with the visibility to have a chance to pull it off.

Deb Markowitz. She's smart, she's energetic, and she hasn't been tagged with any administrative fuckups in her time at ANR. She'sthe only one of Shumlin's rivals who has stayed in the job he appointed her to throughout his governorship. Also, she'll be in the job market in a year and a half no matter what happens. 60%

Matt Dunne. Impressed a lot of people last time around. Very smart and still has a loyal fan base. 50%.

Doug Racine. I was very impressed with his commitment to fighting poverty when he ran last time. Still, there were problems at AHS when he was there, and they didn't all come from conservative pressures from the Fifth Floor. 40%, maybe 30%.

 Peter Welch. I see from John Walters that he's being mentioned, but I just don't see it. He's really impressed people with his effectiveness but he's only been in Congress for five terms, which isn't long enough to really accomplish anything. 5%, just because I don't want to say zero,

 The other statewides: Beth Pearce, Doug Hoffer, Jim Condos. Sure, they'll be mentioned, but they're all doing the jobs they want to do with no foreseeable effective challenge, so they can keep doing those jobs as long as they want. They're staying put.

 Long shots? You never know who could possibly emerge. There's talk about Sue Minter, who ran the Irene recovery and then took over at Transportation. Sue's great, although she doesn't have tremendous statewide visibility. It might make more sense for her to wait for Scott's announcement and then annouce for Lite Gov. 

What about you? Anyone you want to nominate? Anyone mentioned in this diary automatically gets front-paged if you're ready to announce. 

 

Hillary Has the Last Laugh Over E-mail

It’s going to be more difficult to make a campaign issue of Hillary Clinton’s decision to keep her emails private while she served in the State Department, now that we know that someone, (presumably the Chinese government) has been mining official email accounts for revealing personal information, compromising untold numbers of those official accounts.  

As things are now shaping up, it’s looking like a pretty shrewd decision.

Who knows why she did it, but there have been plenty of invasive document searches in the Clintons’ public history, so one would be surprised if she hadn’t at least considered putting a lock and key on things while serving in such a sensitive position.

I recently had a conversation with a visiting New Yorker that opened my eyes to the perception problems Hillary still has even among sympathetic voters.  

I told her that I was supporting Bernie, but would of course support Hillary if she won the primary.

She replied with concern that Hillary…that’s Hillary Clinton, we’re talking about…might not be tough enough for the fight ahead!!!

Why would she say that??  I can think of no tougher candidate, myself!   She could go toe-to-toe with Chris Christie in a knife fight!

Hillary is like a battle-scarred general at this point.  No one on Capitol Hill has withstood so many attacks as have the Clintons. In this judgmental country where marital fidelity is a tenet of public office, she came back from her husband’s sensational betrayal to effectively re-center the conversation around her own intellect and capabilities.

Why would a liberal woman (not a blazing progressive, but at least a moderate/ liberal) think she might not be “tough enough” for a second presidential campaign?

My guess is that the assumption that men and women are true equals in twenty-first century America is just as false as is the meme of “post-racial America.”

In the entire stockade of Republican presidential hopefuls, there is just one female contender, Carly Fiorina. Given her relatively low polling numbers, she probably won’t even be on stage for the debates.

How is that even possible in a country where more than half the voters are female?

It is just another example of how the power structure in America has become stagnant and dysfunctional as corporate ‘news’ investors have been allowed to hijack our principle information streams and groom our misogynistic consumer habits.

The myth of female inferiority is still alive and well and lurking in the corners of the American psyche.

Which is not to say that if Hillary is the nominee she is less likely to win than if she were a man.

In fact, just as  the similarly historic candidacy of Barack Obama was a catalyst for record voter turnout, the possibility of a female president could have a similar effect; but just as the election of America’s first black president (actually bi-racial president) was by no means a signal that America was now ‘post-racial,’  even Hillary’s election would not end the deep seated biases about women that are embedded in the American psyche.

A Norm McAllister Facebook Quiz (for Sue)

12 SIGNS YOUR MALE STATE SENATOR OR STATE REP MAY BE A SEX PERVERT*

#1–He’s a Republican.

#2–He shows all the ladies at the Statehouse how neatly clipped and smooth his middle fingernails are.

#3–He used to hang out years ago with Peter Shumlin at the Langdon Street Cafe; now he hangs out with all the guys from West Virginia who come up to Charlie Os to tell Vermont women how pro-choice they are (“…Darlin’, and I clipped my fingernails.”)

#4–He’s a guest speaker at every Middle School in his area.

#5–When’s there’s a forum in Room 11 at the Statehouse and a well-dressed female comes forward to sit in front of his committee and speak, he keeps dropping his pen on the floor.

#6–He owns a sheep farm.

#7–His re-election bumper sticker reads: YOUR VOTE WILL GET ME ERECTED!

#8–He takes all his vacations in Thailand.

#9–He frequently complains at Co-ops that the organic kale has pubic hair in it (and sometimes he’s right).

#10–He says: “Hey! Hey! Hey!” a lot.

#11–When you call him at the Statehouse about legislation, you get connected to a 900 number.

#12–One of his aides sells Girl Scout cookies.

(I think I’m going to do a PolitenessMan on ole Norm.)

*Pervert–The correct spelling and pronunciation is Pre-vert, as proclaimed by Colonel Bat Guano (Keenan Wynn) in DR. STRANGELOVE, 1964.)

Peter Buknatski

Montpelier (Sensitiveville) Vt.

(Over 1 Million Condoms Sold)