All posts by Sue Prent

About Sue Prent

Artist/Writer/Activist living in St. Albans, Vermont with my husband since 1983. I was born in Chicago; moved to Montreal in 1969; lived there and in Berlin, W. Germany until we finally settled in St. Albans.

Stupid is as stupid does

This morning’s Free Press provided an unusually rich harvest of stupid decisions to ponder.

Stupid was the person who thought it would be a nice surprise to send a musical card inside a Fed-X envelope to a friend at the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services building in St. Albans.  Arriving on the day after the first anniversary of Bin Laden’s demise, it gave government employees a day off and the St. Albans police a chance to break out the full toy box in what was no doubt a very expensive day of show-and-tell.

Stupid was the guy who clocked 170-mph on a motorcycle, headed south on I-87.  The cops eventually caught him and he is being held in the pokey on $20,000 bail.  The Freeps said

“it could not be immediately determined if he had a lawyer.”

Better get one, Son.

Stupid was the Ohio deputy who apparently couldn’t get enough of Abu Ghraib-type funnin’ around and ordered five inmates at the jailhouse to dance for their privileges,

“inviting his colleagues to watch.”

Since he apparently used a prohibited cell-phone to play musical accompaniment, we must assume that he belongs to the short-attention-span variety of media watchers and never learned what the ultimate consequences were for the Abu Ghraib Eleven who also incorporated a cell-phone in their routine.

Unsurprisingly, the sheriff thought it was time for him to have a career change.  Maybe there’ll be an opening on “Dancing with the Stars.”

And extremely stupid, were Miro Weinberger and Ian Carleton for thinking they could justify a hefty salary boost for Mr. Carleton thusly:

Carleton asserted Monday night that a higher municipal salary would be appropriate due to the significant pay cut he’d endure by leaving his current job (he’s a principal at the Burlington-based law firm Sheehey Furlong and Behm).

Carleton also said his graduation from Yale Law School should figure into a higher salary.

Where to begin with the optics of this stupid blunder?   Nepotism, elitism, fiscal irresponsibility…

We don’t like it when the “other” guys do it.   Our guys ought to know better.

Sound familiar?

It looks like Entergy has another high-profile state fight coming to a head about now.  

‘Seems even Massachusetts State Senator Robert Hedlund of Weymouth, a Republican, is joining nuclear opponents in an effort to derail relicensing of another Fukushima era relic like Vermont Yankee;  the Pilgrim Nuclear Generating Station in Weymouth.  

Besides the inherent design flaws of the Mark 1 reactor, and it’s advanced age, State officials are concerned about an overcrowded spent fuel pool, which, though designed to hold just 880 of the highly radioactive spent fuel rods, will soon reach 3,859 units with no likelihood of transfer to dry cask storage.

Like VY, the 40-year old plant has experienced troublesome issues due to equipment failure and human error.  

Unlike Yankee, Pilgrim is now facing a strike by union workers over cost-cutting efforts that they say undermine the safe operation of the plant.

“I’ve heard clearly from my members that they would rather strike than accept Entergy’s ongoing efforts to cost shift medical coverage and change their working conditions,” UWUA President Daniel Hurley said. “This vote is absolutely critical to the safety of our communities and the well-being of our members.”

The good folks who work at Pilgrim have apparently given some thought to the safety of the three million people who live within 50 miles of the plant.  That fifty-mile radius represents the evacuation zone that U.S. officials said should have been observed at Fukushima.

Opponents to relicensing recognize that it would be quite impossible to evacuate that population, which includes  Boston, should the worst come to pass.  My son currently lives in Boston.  Trying to navigate in, around, and out of the city on the best of days is challenging.

In the immediate aftermath of the Fukushima disaster, relicensing the Mark 1 reactor at Vermont Yankee was an act of irresponsibility on the part of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.  

Considering how much larger is the scale of the affected population, that level of irresponsibility is many times greater when it comes to blithely relicensing Pilgrim.

In early April, Massachusetts AG Martha Coakley appealed the NRC’s decision to continue relicensing proceedings for Pilgrim without pausing to reconfigure for the lessons learned from Fukushima. That appeal was unsuccessful.

The NRC’s official reason for denying AG Coakley’s appeal?

In denying Coakley’s request, the NRC explained, “we have already considered and rejected the notion that our Fukushima lessons-learned review needs to be completed prior to a decision on any pending license renewal application.” The attorney general’s appeal alleges that the NRC’s decision violates the National Environmental Policy Act as well as the Atomic Energy Act and the NRC’s own regulations.

Now, NRC Executive Director of Operations, Bill Borchardt is advocating himself for the NRC to okay the license extention.

It looks unstoppable at this point, but opponents have not abandoned hope.



A state-wide coalition of 14 different groups wants Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick to ask the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to reject the NRC staff’s April 23rd request to approve relicensing of the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station in Plymouth. The NRC staff recommended that NRC Commissioners approve the relicensing at their next meeting May 8, despite several outstanding challenges to the licensing process.

Beset by labor unrest, equipment failure, design flaws, human error and unresolvable radioactive waste issues, how likely is it that either Vermont or Massachusetts would get anything but grief from continued operation of Entergy’s unlucky step-children.  Public Service Board: can you hear me now?

Some reflections on May Day

For a couple of years in the mid-70’s, my husband and I lived in Berlin, Germany.  

On May first of each year, we rode the subway into East Berlin to witness a pageant of pretend strength as Soviet heavy armaments were rolled-out for display in the May Day parade.  In sharp contrast to the bellicose message of the parade, a visit to any of the meager shops along the way revealed just how poor were the life-style choices available to the average East German.

The “East Mark” had so little real buying power that tourists were required to purchase roughly the equivalent of $10.00 in face value of the worthless currency in order to even be admitted to East Berlin.  It used to be a standing joke that, try as you might, you never could find anything worthwhile on which to spend your compulsory East Marks.

One year we arrived late, a little after the crowd had already lined-up along the parade route.  The other streets, leading from the train station to the center of town, were never bustling even on ordinary days.  On that morning they were completely deserted; and the quiet felt electrified.  

As we strolled up Unter den Linden to reach the parade route, the cobblestones beneath our feet began to vibrate.  Then, the entire cityscape shook as if from an earthquake, as an enormous tank rumbled down the deserted boulevard toward us.  We  fled the street to huddle by a building until the thing passed us, but that sensation of utter powerlessness in the face of overwhelming military strength put a sober face on our experiences that day.

Of course it was popularly known by then that all the commercial vitality of East Germany had been sapped by corruption within the Communist Party bureaucracy, leaving nothing but this gaudy pantomime every year and a thriving black market economy.  

Nowhere was there a better demonstration of the fact that, even where officially abhorred, the principles of capitalistic enterprise will assert and prevail, in a Darwinian manner, without any protections whatsoever. The collapse of the Soviet empire was already in the cards.

That’s why I bristle every time someone gets all sanctimonious about the capitalistic “system.”  It’s not really a system at all, it’s a primal instinct.  

Setting aside, for the moment,  the mechanics of the thing; “capitalism” is based on the primeval desire to serve one’s own interests, whereas “communism” is based on a more elevated observation that fairly distributed effort and wealth benefits all who engage in a pursuit equally.  The fatal flaw in “communism” is, of course, a return to the primal, when the temptation to cheat inevitably becomes overpowering.

Rather than glorying in capitalism, I have just accepted it as the natural state of human greed on which we must constantly endeavor to impose curbs so that it doesn’t result in exploitation of the weakest members of society, nor pull the whole economy down on top of its over-grasping corpus.

Even though we tend to associate International Worker’s Day, with twentieth century European-style social activism, the history of May Day as a celebration of  workers’ solidarity began as a commemoration of the Haymarket Massacre in 1886 Chicago.

My home town was a brutal place to labor at the end of the nineteenth century; and rather like now, the working class were the principle victims when reckless speculation among the moneyed-class brought the general economy to its knees.  The Industrial revolution had cheapened the value of human labor and begun a race to the bottom as wealthy industrialists exploited an over-abundance of desperate immigrants and failed farmers to keep the engines of automated production turning round the clock.

Labor was squeezed to work longer and longer hours, and on May 1, 1886, workers at the McCormick Harvesting Machine Company in Chicago had finally had enough and went on strike for a shorter work day.  

Strikebreakers were brought in and the striking workers clashed with police.  Responding to a peaceful demonstration on May 4, the mayor sent police to disperse the crowd forcibly.  One thing led to the next and someone threw a pipe-bomb which killed seven policemen.  The police then fired into the crowd, killing four people.  

In the anti-labor hysteria that followed, all reason was suspended:

A period of panic and overreaction followed in Chicago. Hundreds of workers were detained; some were beaten during interrogation and a number of forced confessions was obtained. In the end, eight anarchists were put on trial and seven were convicted of conspiracy to commit murder. Four were hanged in November 1887, one committed suicide and three were later pardoned by Illinois governor, John Peter Altgeld… no evidence was provided at the time, nor has any been discovered since, which connected the eight convicted workers to the bomb-throwing. Widespread fear of unionism and other radicalism influenced most of the public to support harsh treatment of the accused.

The incident ushered in an era of hostility to labor reform and suspicion of socialism that, despite later achievements of U.S. labor unions,  continues to feed the right-wing myth machine.

So we find ourselves in the first decade of the twenty-first century, once again facing a social and political climate in which the rich and powerful right, not content with gutting the middle class, are finding new excuses for unpinning the social safety nets that were carefully constructed in an era of greater self-knowledge to prevent exactly the kind of desperation that led to the Haymarket riots and similar acts of revolution in the early days of the Twentieth Century.

We never seem to learn. “Communism” or “capitalism;”  sooner or later all economic models descend to the lowest common denominator…unbridled greed and selfishness.  And when that happens, it is just a matter of time before revolution rears its ugly head.

Whither Walmart

Having weathered a brutal and unsuccessful struggle to stop a permit for the largest Walmart superstore in the State of Vermont, those of us who are members of the Northwest Citizens for Responsible Growth received this week’s news of Walmart’s Mexican permit scandal with little surprise.  

That this scandal is affecting the company’s stock value and putting pressure on Congress to investigate its implications under US law makes us cautiously optimistic that the troubled company, already suffering from lagging U.S.sales, may never occupy the St. Albans site.

There is speculation that some of Walmart’s U.S. executives may face criminal charges over the Mexican bribery and cover-up incidents:

“The allegations that Wal-Mart officials in Mexico may have broken U.S. laws by bribing officials to get their stores built faster raise serious concerns,” Rep. Cummings said in a statement to TPM. “But I am even more alarmed by reports that top company executives in the U.S. tried to cover-up these abuses. We need to ensure that US corporations comply fully with the law, and we need to determine the full scope of these alleged abuses.”

Under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act it is

“…unlawful to bribe foreign government officials to obtain or retain business.”

The intimacy of Walmart’s Mexican operation with its U.S. parent is illustrated by the fact that the newest CEO of the company, Mike Duke, who replaced Lee Scott in 2008, is the former vice-chair of the International Division which was responsible for the rapid expansion of Walmart in Mexico.

In that capacity, Mr. Duke apparently first learned of the bribery allegations in 2005, keeping the secret long after he accepted his current position at the helm of the mothership.

It takes no leap of imagination to guess that corporate practices in Mexico could be a reflection of practices closer to home.  Walmart has long had the reputation of being an “end justifies the means” kind of operation, engaging in questionable business ethics and even some bullying.

Construction permits are complex ballets of engagement, involving developers, local officials, concerned citizens and the retailer itself.  They play out in many acts and largely unnoticed by the greater population.  All kinds of negotiations take place and it would be naive to believe that money never changes hands .

Somehow the corporate giant has always managed to escape unscathed from most legal entanglements, either because the issue involved was too large in scale, (ie.discrimination against female employees); or, because its penny-pinching practices, widely believed to translate into bargain prices for consumers, make it politically inconvenient for lawmakers to challenge those practices or even to look too closely at the underlying legalities.

It seems the corporate behemoth’s luck may be changing.

Eight months and counting since the Supremes gave their go-ahead; and there is still no sign at the site of the “St. Albans Walmart.”

Bernie Sanders Takes on NRC Corruption

Bernie Sanders announced today that he will oppose an Obama administration reappointment to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Senator Sanders is opposing reappointment of Commissioner Kristine Svinicki, in light of her inaction to implement safety measures based on the lessons learned from Fukushima.

“With Commissioner Svinicki’s vote, the NRC approved Vermont Yankee’s license extension a week after the Fukushima disaster, without even pausing to consider the safety implications for the Vermont plant which shares the same design as the Fukushima reactors that melted down….The Commissioner has not supported full implementation of all post-Fukushima safety reforms recommended by an NRC task force, and has in fact voted to approve licenses for two new nuclear reactors without requiring them to implement these safety reforms.’

Svinicki, whose current term is set to expire on June 30, is a former aide of top Republican lawmakers. She has been a key figure in the embedded culture of industry influence prevailing at the NRC; and has conspicuously bumped horns with NRC Chair Gregory Jackzo in his attempts to mitigate the undermining effect of that culture.

Together with a laundry list of complaints of unethical behavior, such as misrepresentations concerning the proposed Yucca Mountain nuclear waste repository, Svinicki’s reappointment is of particular concern to Vermonters:

“Commissioner Svinicki also voted in secret to recommend that the Department of Justice side with Entergy in its federal preemption lawsuit against the state of Vermont, despite admitting at a Senate hearing she had not read the seminal 1983 U.S. Supreme Court decision on federal nuclear preemption. The NRC’s job is to ensure safety, not to promote nuclear power.

‘Time to send some election-year letters of protest to the President?

The Wolf Who Cried “Boy”

Ryan Doyle has now won election to the St. Albans City Council as Ward 5 Alderman, twice.

This time, the margin was so wide that it would seem Joe Luneau has no hope of again overturning the results.  

In fact, it was Mr. Doyle who picked-up considerably more support since the first election.  Despite his best efforts at beating the bushes far and wide for absentee voters…some very much absent…Mr. Luneau garned roughly the same number of votes as he did in the first election.

The incumbent wasn’t about to go down without a fight.  Perhaps sensing that sentiments in Ward 5 were running against him, late yesterday afternoon in the midst of voting, Mr. Luneau’s backers sought a court order in Franklin County Superior Court to allow a group of thirteen defective absentee ballots to be “replaced” with new ballots.

That’s right; not content with having cast an ethical shadow over the whole question of absentee voter rights by admitting to soliciting votes from people no longer living in Ward 5, Mr. Luneau now sought to further stretch the law in order to have defective absentee ballots replaced with new ones.

This is the same Joe Luneau who insisted repeatedly that a new election was necessary in order to reaffirm voter confidence in the integrity of the system.  

Due to the lateness of the request, Judge Robert Mello issued an order allowing for new ballots to be issued to the absentee voters, but specified that, upon completion, these should not be co-mingled with the rest of the ballots, but held until, after due consideration, he could render a decision on the matter.

At this point we can only speculate on why those ballots were deemed “defective,” but it may be significant that the judge cites Title 17, article 2547 in the first line of the order:

§ 2547. Defective ballots

If upon examination by the election officials it shall appear that the early or absentee voter is not legally qualified to vote, or has voted in person, or that the affidavit on any envelope is insufficient, the certificate is not signed, or the voted ballot is not in the voted ballot envelope, or, in the case of a primary vote, the early or absentee voter has failed to return the unvoted portions of the primary ballots, such envelope shall be marked “defective,” and the ballots inside shall not be counted and shall be returned in the unopened envelope to the town clerk in the manner prescribed by section 2590 of this title. The provisions of this section shall be indicated prominently in the early or absentee voter material prepared by the secretary of state. (Added 1977, No. 269 (Adj. Sess.), § 1; amended 1985, No. 196 (Adj. Sess.), § 6; 2001, No. 6, § 11, eff. April 10, 2001

Come what may with those thirteen ballots,  Mr. Doyle’s majority is so overwhelming that it would make no difference to the outcome.

In the wake of all this melodrama, the ethical and legal issues raised in the St. Albans vote have been so significant that Secretary of State Jim Condos has offered to Mayor Liz Gamache, who chairs the Board of Civil Authority, that he will send a team of representatives from his office to walk the BCA through the complexities that have arisen, in order to avoid a future repeat.

Not surprisingly, he reports that his phone was ringing off the hook yesterday as Luneau supporters sought, unsuccessfully, to persuade him that new absentee ballots should be recognized in replacement of the ones deemed “spoiled.”  

This morning, the sun is shining, the birds are singing; and the voters of Ward 5 have delivered a message, loudly and clearly, about the importance of ethics, beyond mere legality, in winning their support.

Updated: Chicago-style Corruption is “Legal” in St. A

(An update to the coverage we’ve been providing of this grassroots campaign. – promoted by Jack McCullough)

…it may be “legal,” but it did NOT win the day!

The Ward 5 St. Albans election results are in and Ryan Doyle beat Joe Luneau, 224-147! Seems to be a victory not just for Mr. Doyle, but for ethical election practices in general.

_____________________________________________________________________________

I’ve just gotta say that, if this disgraceful display of bold-faced political amorality doesn’t bring an end to politics as usual in St. Albans, I don’t know what will!  

Today, Sam Hemingway’s painfully detailed exposure of the absentee ballot shenanigans related to tomorrow’s Ward 5 do-over election made this St. Albans resident cringe.  

It came on the heels of some really masterful coverage of the unfolding story by the Messenger’s Michele Monroe.  Last week, the paper published a list of the 100+ voters who have requested absentee ballots for tomorrow’s vote.  Reacting to the list, candidate Ryan Doyle is quoted as being concerned that candidate Joe Luneau is considerably over-reaching in his effort to “get out the vote.”

“Some of these people don’t live in the ward anymore or the city,” Doyle said. “Several of them live in other communities like Colchester and Burlington, and even other states.”

For his part, Mr. Luneau,  who piously demanded the revote to cleanse the process for the sake of voter confidence, seems quite sanguine about the ethics of recruiting non-residents to vote in tomorrow’s election:

Luneau, in an interview last week, acknowledged he has encouraged people to request absentee ballots who he knows are on the checklist but don’t live in Ward 5, a move he said was entirely legal.

“If they’re comfortable voting in this race, I certainly wouldn’t tell them not to do so,” Luneau said. “My focus is to get my supporters out.”

As regular readers of GMD may know, I have been a supporter of planning commissioner Ryan Doyle for Ward 5 alderman; and Ryan Doyle did indeed defeat incumbent Joe Luneau in the close Town Meeting Day vote.

No one was surprised that Mr. Luneau wanted a recount since it was such a close race; but when several subsequent recount efforts never varied from the Doyle win outcome, and no deliberate effort at undermining the process was revealed on investigation, we were very puzzled that a district judge would order a new election.

Of course, as is noted in the Freeps article, the Luneau family is a powerful political machine with significant resources.  Doyle, who was trained as a civil engineer but currently must support himself and his civic volunteer activities on the salary of a factory shift-worker, could not afford to hire an attorney in order to appeal what seemed an unsupported decision on the part of the judge who vacated the election.

This small town election melodrama is playing out as a classic allegory of the power imbalance and wealth bias that is reflected throughout American politics today.  

When Ryan won the election despite Mr. Luneau’s having outspent him roughly four-to-one, I was momentarily buoyed by the notion that the 99% ultimately might also have their day.  That fantasy of equity was quickly disabused when the heavy hand and purse of Luneau influence went about undoing the election.

But I had no idea then how unashamedly unprincipled Mr. Luneau could be!  It’s dumfounding even to a gal from Daley’s Chicago!

That what he is doing isn’t even technically illegal just makes my blood run cold.

Update: Guttering the Streams

I just wanted to add this link to an excellent piece from The Valley News, featuring comments by Kim Greenwood of the Vermont Natural Resource Council.

__________________________________________________________

In the wake of Tropical Storm Irene, Governor Shumlin’s “git ‘er done” directives regarding stream bed recovery efforts, may have plumped the machismo of his national image, but they flew in the face of regulatory wisdom.

This raised an angry welt within the administration as ANR’s Deb Markowitz publicly protested; but it delighted the target audience of weary locals and developers impatient with regulatory constraints.

The governor drew his line in the sand then and there, and he did not stand on the inconvenient side of sustainability.

Now Vermont’s Department of Fish and Wildlife has released its annual report, and unsurprisingly, it is getting little attention from the press or the governor’s office.

The report explains that, in the normal course of things, when a major storm event such as Irene occurs, if stream beds are allowed to recover without significant interference, populations of fish and other aquatic life return to normal within two to four years.  

By contrast, the kind of dredging and stream-straightening that occurred after Irene, when the governor allowed regulations to be temporarily waived, degrades habitat so that it will take much, much longer for aquatic life to recover after all.

Where aquatic habitat has been severely altered through streambed and natural wood mining, channel widening and straightening, complex habitat features will need to re-establish before improvements in fish and aquatic populations can be expected. While relatively short reaches of impacted streams may recover in a matter of years, the recovery of longer reaches may take decades and will depend upon the availability and mobility of upstream sources of coarse streambed material and natural wood, as well as the magnitude and frequency of future flood events.

That means dollars and cents to Vermont, where angling tourism represents a significant source of state and local revenues, demonstrating once again one of the many ways in which responsible regulatory enforcement is not the enemy of economic vitality, but it’s essential counterpart.

Consider this little nugget of facts lifted from the report:

The 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife Associated recreation estimated that over 63 million dollars were spent by resident and nonresident anglers in Vermont (USFWS 2008). Of the variety of sport fisheries available in Vermont, stream trout fishing has always been one of the most popular. A statewide survey of Vermont anglers confirms this and estimated over 875,000 trout fishing trips in streams and rivers by resident and non resident anglers in 2009 (Connelly and Knuth 2010). Degradation of aquatic habitats will likely impact the quality of stream fisheries in several Vermont watersheds.

We already know that the unplanned effect of stream dredging and “straightening” is to increase the risk of flooding from subsequent major storm events, since such ill-considered engineering serves only to speed up the course of water traveling in the artificial channel.

You have to wonder if anyone from the Governor’s office is listening, though.  I have heard no acknowledgment of lessons learned, and even as I write this, the Governor is advocating to weaken citizen access in Act 250 regulation of development.  He still seems to want to telegraph the message that he is anti-regulatory when it comes to anything other than VY.

But somehow his arguments for “streamlining” the permit process (like those of former Governor Douglas) recollect all too figuratively the negative effects of guttering the streams in the aftermath of Irene.  One of the only things that saved Vermont from the recent real estate collapse experienced in most other states, was the “braking” effect of our considered permit process.

Governor Shumlin’s sense of urgency about all matters regulatory may be more a reflection of the need to move to a four year gubernatorial term than anything else.  Perhaps if it were unnecessary to begin crafting a reelection campaign immediately after taking office, we might see our governors do a better job of concentrating on job one.  

Not all accomplishments are a matter of speed, and not all growth should be a matter of breadth. There is depth and “topography” to be considered.  

Just ask the trout.

Just Occasionally, Someone Listens

In March, Vermont’s Arnie and (our own) Maggie Gundersen of Fairewinds Associates  penned a report for Friends of the Earth,  which prompted the NRC to put an indefinite hold on operation of the San Onofre nuclear facility in California.

In his analysis of available public information, Gundersen has concluded that “both units 2 and 3 have experienced extraordinarily rapid degradation of their steam generator tubes.” He has concluded that the “severe short-term steam generator degradation” could lead to a “large risk of tube failure” and result in “an uncontrolled release of radiation into the environment.”

Now we are hearing some details of the NRC response.  After touring the facility NRC Chairman Jaczko

had this to say about the issue of tube degradation, accelerated by design changes, that was raised in Fairewinds’ report:

The NRC “wants to get to the bottom” of the plant’s problems, he said. “The issue of the steam generators is a very serious issue.”

“We have to have assurance of safety before we will allow the plant to restart,” he added.

Could this be signaling a change in the mindset at the NRC?

Is it too much to hope that they might reexamine their hasty extension of VY’s license in light of lessons from Fukushima?

Of course it is.

How fitting that this news roughly coincides with the 33rd anniversary of the infamous accident at Three Mile Island.

A third of a century later, the official line on the amount of radiation released at TMI, held by both the industry and the NRC, still differs markedly from that of Mr. Gundersen, who was sacked by his employers after coming forward in 1990 as the key whistleblower. For some perspective on this “difference of opinion,” have a look at this interesting piece on how, in the past, truth has been bent to serve industry purposes.

Just to wrap things up, I thought I’d embed a Rachel Madow discussion of Fukushima that brings her special talent for articulation to bear on the realities of this ongoing disaster, plus a look at the politics of nuclear waste.  

Have a peaceful Easter!  Strike that…I wish you an UNEVENTFUL Easter!

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Saturday Grumble

No doubt many of you daily subscribers to the Freeps received a letter with your paper this morning, informing you that Gannett was about to institute yet another change; this time to your home delivery.

It seems that our paper will no longer be flung up on the front porch, an arrangement that has been quite agreeable to me.  It will, instead, be inserted in a tube at the end of our non-existant driveway.

“To provide you the best customer service that we can”

I have emphasized what I believe is the operative part of that quote, which might be expanded thusly:

…while rigorously guarding our bottom line.

The letter ends with the assurance that our subscription rate will not be affected by this “improvement.”

For all the other frustrated Free Press subscribers out there, I decided to share my e-mailed response to the Distribution Manager, Patrick McDonough:

Dear Mr. McDonough,

Thank you for your letter of April 6, proposing to change the manner in which our daily paper is delivered.  Frankly, this has me puzzled.  Where exactly do you propose to “place” this tube?  I don’t expect you’ll start drilling into the exterior of my house, will you?  We have an ample sheltered front porch on which the paper lands nicely without incident on most days.

(continued after the “fold”)

 

We live in a big house on ……..St., a very busy street adjacent to downtown.  We do not have a driveway in front of our house.  Do you propose to install your tube on the parking strip in front of our house?  If so, you might find that the City of St. Albans takes issue with that arrangement, since this is an historic district where every change must be run by the planning commission.  You may also find that the number of calls from me for missed papers increases substantially, since ….. St. in front of my house serves as primary parking for downtown during business hours, and many may find it convenient to “pick-up” the paper from my delivery tube on their way down to work.

Let’s see, what are all the things I now “love” about the changes proposed by Gannett to Free Press print service?  There is the shift to tabloid “with color on every page,”

so I can look forward to not being too troubled by the depth of my news.  Then there was the sudden switch from color to black and white for the interior pages of the Sunday comics…I guess that would be classed as robbing Peter to pay Paul?

Now, my paper is to be delivered curbside for the enjoyment of the first lucky, if slightly less than honest, passerby.

How much for a digital subscription instead?  Oh, that’s right, if I choose digital I will be further relieved of the burden of excess information because the text available online will represent an abbreviated version of the full paper.

Well I’m pretty much damned if I do and damned if I don’t, am I not?

Thank you for your attention.