All posts by mydog

“We’re Not Your ATM” rally photos

( – promoted by odum)

Here’s a sampling the "Jim Douglas, We’re Not Your ATM" events around the state. This piece is a work in progress as more photos are sent in later today. In Burlington there was a good turnout with lots of enthusiastic honks

From Green Mountain Daily

Wow, a great turnout in the early morning hours!

From Green Mountain Daily
From Green Mountain Daily

A big crew here:

From Green Mountain Daily

More below the fold, and more to come…

Here's a couple from Bennington, where Jim Douglas balked in his scheduled appearance and quickly organized a "counter-rally" from the sheep in his flock.

From Green Mountain Daily
From Green Mountain Daily

Director of National Intelligence gets the “Yea, Duh!” award of the day.

A Washington Post headline in the “Nation” news section is a pure example of the politically obvious.  So alright, we can give the  some cred for what's also obvious:  Mike McConnell's transparent, fear-mongering nod to McCain 4 days before the general election.

Intelligence Head Says Next President Faces Volatile Era 
 
By Joby Warrick
Washington Post Staff Writer 
Friday, October 31, 2008; Page A10
NASHVILLE, Oct. 30 — The next U.S. president will govern in an era of increasing international instability, including a heightened risk of terrorist attacks in the near future, long-term prospects of regional conflicts and diminished U.S. dominance across the globe, the nation's top intelligence officer said Thursday.
Competition for energy, water and food will drive conflicts between nations to a degree not seen in decades, and climate change and global economic upheaval will amplify the effects, Mike McConnell, the director of national intelligence, said in a speech here.
McConnell, who has given security briefings to both major-party presidential candidates, said the list of worries will soon drown out the euphoria as the next occupant of the White House settles into the job.
“After the new president-elect's excitement subsides after winning the election, it is going to be dampened somewhat when he begins to focus on the realities of the myriad of changes and challenges,” he said. 

 

“Jim Douglas, We’re Not Your ATM” rallies across Vermont on Friday

From Green Mountain Daily

Taxpayers to denounce Jim Douglas' use of state money for his campaign


In light of reports that Jim Douglas has failed to reimburse the state for campaign-related expenses, Vermont taxpayers will hold visibility events around the state demanding his campaign refund the money. The photo above was taken at a rally in Bennington today.
 
And guess what?  Douglas delayed his appearance in order to organize a counter rally.  So expect more of the same tomorrow.
 
WHAT: Taxpayer visibility to demand Jim Douglas reimburse the state for campaign-related expenses.

WHEN: Friday Oct 31& WHERE:

Bennington County:
Intersection of Main and South Streets
7 – 9 a.m.

Chittenden County:
Staples Plaza, Williston Rd.
7 – 9 a.m.

Intersection of Church and Main Streets
12 noon

Rutland County:
Corner of Routes 4 and 7
7 – 9 a.m.

Windsor County:
Bridge at the Intersection of Routes 4 and 14 in Hartford
7 – 9 a.m.

Washington County:
City Hall, Montpelier
7 – 9 a.m.

Windham County:
Corner of Main and Bridge Streets
7 – 9 a.m.

UPDATE: Douglas violates Code of Ethics. Formal Complaint to AG below the fold.

(Good job, Nate! – promoted by JulieWaters)

UPDATE: A Call For You to Act, please.  (We can't forget to say, “please.”)

Please call WCAX, WPTZ, Burlington Free Press and Vermont Press Bureau this afternoon and tomorrow.  Please be willing to offer your quote on this issue.  This is your opportunity to affect the decision with more influence than your vote.

What you need to know:  The AG met on this issue and has taken the position that there is no legal violation here.  However, please call the print and television reporters in follow up. 

Here is my official response for the record.  Please call and follow up in similar vien.  Thanks for your help.

 

“While the AG has made a decision in regard to the law, Douglas has clearly violated his own Code of Ethics.  Amazingly Douglas is now questioning the integrity of former Governor Dean, who reimbursed thousands of dollars to Vermont taxpayers over 5 election cycles.  The question of integrity lands at the feet of Governor Douglas as he refuses to accept his responsibility to and continues to pass the blame to anyone else he can accuse.”

 

 

Two weeks ago Shay Totten broke the story about Jim Douglas campaigning on the taxpayer dime in “The Governor's Free Ride.”  In his report, Totten refers to Vermont's Personnel Policies & Procedures regarding the appropriate — and inappropriate — use of state property.

Yesterday, Gaye Symington added Governor Douglas' 2003 Executive Code of Ethics as she demanded accountability on this issue.

In addition to the inappropriate use of state proprety, Symington called out Jim Douglas for his use of state funds to support his campaign.  Douglas has now repeatedly dismissed this concern, despite the fact that every government official, business owner and private accountant understands that co-mingling of funds violates standard practices and general rules of accounting.

To make a comparison, every business owner in Vermont is well aware that co-mingling of business and personal funds is neither ethically correct nor legally accepted. In the private sector, such co-mingling of funds carries the risk of an audit, fines, penalities and possibly legal charges from the IRS. 

Prior governors separated official business expenditures from their private campaign expenses, reimbursing the state when the expenses overlapped in a way they could not prevent.  Vermont's other statewide elected officials, including the Auditor, Treasurer and Secretary of State, would not be excused for co-mingling public resources within their private political campaigns.  Despite the standards practiced by every other leading official in Vermont government, it appears that Governor Douglas feels he is “beyond reproach” and therefore not required to separate or reimburse public expenses from his campaign in 2004, 2006 and now again in 2008. 

How much money are we talking about?  Without transparency or the use of standard accounting it's impossible to know for certain.  According to Totten's “The Governor Gets a Free Ride,” Howard Dean reimbursed Vermont taxpayers to the tune of $7500 over 5 election cycles.  But Douglas has been a bit more lavish on himself than Howard Dean.  One of his first initiatives as Governor in 2002 was to give himself a raise in salary by more than $30,000.  Add to this circumstantial evidence Douglas' constant trips around the state, and it's even more difficult to estimate expenses incurred for his security detail.  

This isn't the first time Jim Douglas has turned his back on his empty Code.  In April of 2007 Douglas appointee, Neale Lunderville, attempted to bribe Representative James Fitzgerald.  As reported by Ross Sneyd, Fitzgerald said Lunderville offeed $50,000 for a highway project in Fiztgerald's district in exchange for a “no” vote on major budget bill.  At that time, Douglas defended his former campaign manager, then Secretary of Transportation.  Lunderville has since been promoted to the highest post in government for politcal appointees as Douglas' Secretary of Administration.

Both then and now, Douglas has participated in clear violations in ethical practices and standards of conduct.  Additionally, he has refused to take corrective action.  In 2007 House Speaker Gaye Symington wrote a formal letter to the governor in response to Lunderville's bribery attempt, calling for the creation of a state ethics code in law.  Douglas refused, suggesting that members of both the executive and legislative branch are, “people who for the most part are above reproach.”

People above reproach should not be people above the law.  Perhaps this is why Jim Douglas refused to help Symington strengthen the code of ethics with the force of law. 

How much value do Vermonters place in the ethical practice of government?  Do business owners and accountants believe that the IRS will overlook obvious co-mingling of professional and personal funds?  How do we hold our public officials accountable when we are told they are “above reproach?”

Two days ago, Alaskan Senator Ted Stevens was convicted of lying about financial gifts he recieved from an oil pipeline services company, and yet he continues to run as a candidate for office.  While Jim Douglas hasn't engaged in criminal activity, his easy dismissal of ethics violations and personnel policies echoes the perplexing audacity of politicians who don't accept the fact that they must be held accountable.  The only measure of accountability preventing Ted Stevens, a convicted criminal, from continuing his campaign as an incummbent, is the force of peer pressure. 

Since Governor Douglas refuses to measure up to his own standards of conduct and Code of Ethics, Vermonters must hold him accountable on November 4th.  A governor who dismisses ethical violations should be summarily dismissed from office.  

 

UPDATE, Oct. 30, 11:25am:  Formal Complaint filed with AG below the fold.  Times Argus article and link provided.

 

From the Times Argus:

Freeman calls for ethics investigation
11:33 a.m. 
October 30, 2008 
By DANIEL BARLOW
Vermont Press Bureau

MONTPELIER – A Northfield Democrat on Thursday asked the Vermont Attorney General’s Office to investigate Republican Gov. James Douglas’ re-election campaign for allegedly using public resources for political purposes.

Nate Freeman, a candidate for lieutenant governor during the Democratic primaries, sent a formal request to the Attorney General accusing Douglas of violating state campaign finance law.

The move comes a day after Democratic candidate for governor Gaye Symington accused Douglas of not following in former Gov. Howard Dean’s footsteps by reimbursing the state for travel expenses related to his reelection campaign.

“From a legal perspective, Douglas is violating campaign finance law by co-mingling public and private funds,” Freeman wrote in his letter to the Attorney General Thursday. 

The Douglas campaign has denied misusing public funds. 

If the Attorney General does investigate the Republican incumbent, it would be the second campaign finance flap in the gubernatorial race after independent candidate Anthony Pollina was accused of accepting individual donations higher than allowed. He won that case earlier this month in court.

Contact Daniel Barlow at Daniel.Barlow@timesargus.com.

 

 

To:  The Attorney Generals Office

From:  Nate Freeman, Northfield, VT
October 30th, 2008
I hereby offer my formal complaint against candidate Jim Douglas in reference to violations of campaign finance law for not disclosing the use of public resources and expenditures in pursuit of his candidacy for re-election to the office of governor. 
In addition to this complaint I offer the following context and considerations for your review.

1.  From a legal perspective, Douglas is violating campaign finance law by co-mingling public and private funds.  Furthermore, he has not offered general accounting practices in delineating public expenditures such as the use of security details in his campaign finance reports.  
2.  From a policy perspective, it appears to me that Douglas is either gifting or loaning himself public resources and funds via campaign expenditures.  In addition to the question of ethics, this activity runs counter to Personnel Policies and Procedures.  
3.  In regard to the Code of Ethics, Douglas holds himself unaccountable to ethical violations.  He holds his appointees to a higher standard than he accepts for himself.  The Code of Ethics is only enforceable by himself or his designated agent.  
4.  Douglas needs to answer a legitimate, valid and timely questions:  “Why should Vermonters accept his argument that he is “above reproach” in respect to ethical issues?  How can Vermonters reasonably accept his arguments against the precedence of Howard Dean over a period of 5 terms?  Is this the standard Vermonters should accept from public officials, and if so, what are the limitations on the use of public expenditures for the use of campaigns by incumbent elected officials.  Does his standard apply to other statewide office holders, including the Lt. Gov., Treasurer, AG, Auditor and Sec of State?”
5.  There is a pattern of Douglas turning a blind eye to ethical issues, including the allegation of bribery against appointee Neale Lunderville in April 2007.  While this issue was resolved through a diplomatic handshake agreement, are Vermonters to assume that any and all ethical questions will be determined exclusively by the Governor or his designated appointee?  Will all ethical issues, including allegations of legal violations such as bribery, be determined by the Governor now and in the future?  
Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter.


— 
Nate Freeman
Freeman's Upholstery Shop, Inc.
Green Mountain Kitty Litter, Inc.
109 VT RTE 12A
Northfield, VT 05663
(802) 485-4428

 

 

Jane Lindholm = Excellent Interview of Jim Douglas

VPR “Vermont Edition” host, Jane Lindholm, provided a bona-fide journalistic interview of Governor Jim Douglas today.  The podcast is available on the VPR site, and I highly recommend clicking over for a listen.

http://www.vpr.net/episode/44687/

Oddly, the interview ended at 12:40 despite the fact the show goes to 1pm.  Did Jim Douglas point to his watch and motion to Lindholm that he had to cut out?  ðŸ™‚

Lindholm and VT Edition producer, Sarah Ashworth accomplished something that's pretty difficult to encounter when reading or listening to Vermont news programs.  The show offered very informed questions as well as clear, hard-hitting follow-ups.  Real honest to goodness journalism.  

The show deserved praise, so I sent the following note along to Jane.  As an aside, I think it's important to let Vermont's reporters know when we appreciate a job well done, in addition to the times we're not that impressed.  There's a saying that goes, “If no one's complaining, it means you're doing a good job.”  Well, it's also nice to send out a quick, “Keep up the good work!”  note as well, in my humble opinion.  My quick note to Jane is below the fold.

But more importantly, go listen to the podcast on the Vermont Edition page:

http://www.vpr.net/episode/44687/ 

 

 

Hi Jane,

Thank you for today's interview on Vermont Edition.  The use of respectful yet uncompromising news questions along with journalistic, fact-checking follow-ups is the kind of reporting we need in order to learn more about the real issues here in Vermont.  Unfortunately, it's far too often that interviewees are given softball questions and allowed to simply say what they assume listeners of similar views want to hear.  We have come to expect this in national news reporting, which has devolved from journalistic integrity far too significantly in a way that leading news organizations have acknowledged help lead America to an unnecessary war in Iraq.  

Today's interview with Governor Jim Douglas was incredibly candid, offering the kinds of frank questions and follow-up fact checking that Vermonters and Americans are no longer accustomed to or even expect.

Please keep up the good work in this direction, Jane, no matter who your interviewee may be.  

US Senator calls for investigation of US Legislature to determine who’s “anti-American.”

This is officially yesterday’s news, but I didn’t catch it until this evening.

  Chris Matthews does a good job calling out Senator Michele Bachman when she uses the words, liberal, leftist and anti-American as meaning the same thing.

 

The meat of the interview starts around the 9:40 mark, but the unbelievable quote is the eleven-second span between 10:22 and 10:33.  

According to Senator Michele Bachmann:

"…the news media should do a penetrating expose and take a look, I wish they would, I wish the American media would take a great look at the views of the people in Congress and find out if they're pro-America or anti-America.  I think people would love to see an expose like that."

Holy McCarthyism!  This is a direct quote, no joke.  Let's just hope the American media starts with Bachmann.  

The html code for the video was a little screwy, so here's the link to MSNBC: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/27317976#27317976

Tour of Glory. Times Argus Op-Ed

( – promoted by odum)

UPDATE:   Rutland Herald today reports on Auditor Tom Salmon's continuing military service in “Vt. auditor's Iraq service hampers re-election bid.”

I've deferred posting this piece until it was publised in the Times Argus.  In case you don't read the Sunday Rutland Herald/Times Argus, here's the piece in whole orignally written in early September. – Nate Freeman 

Let's face it:  No Vermonter serves America more often than Brian Dubie does.

As you may recall, Vermont's Lieutenant Governor has been called to duty three times in the last four years and each time he has served in important capacities.  In September 2005 he responded as a relief coordinator in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.  In September 2006, he was called to Iraq and stood beside commanding generals on the rooftops of Baghdad.  And now in September of 2008, Brian Dubie has been called to coordinate airlifts of personnel and supplies from Panama City, Florida to support relief efforts in Galveston, Texas. 

There is no question that each of these three tours of service were critical for both American relief and military efforts.  As a reservist in Vermont's Air National Guard, Brian Dubie has the same commitments as any other Vermont reservist.  No Vermonter questions Brian Dubie's patriotism as he serves our country selflessly.  No Vermonter questions his love for America, mom and apple pie. 

But Brian Dubie isn't just a soldier.  He's also a statewide politician serving three terms as Vermont's Lieutenant Governor following his sudden rise in public service from a prior position on a local school board.  Politicians can be a breed of their own, especially those who succumb to the temptations of public glory through the esteem of their office and the ability to create headlines with little more than symbolic gestures and front page photo opportunities.  Despite the fact that Brian Dubie is a reservist, his public life is not immune to these kinds of political temptations.  In fact, in being called to active duty for the third time in the last three years, there seems to be a trend which suggests that the Lieutenant Governor isn't serving America as much as he is staging a political show.

The rest below the fold. 

The political veil between public service and show-making can be lifted toward the truth if we ask one simple question:  “Why are Brian Dubie's tours of duty so much shorter than any other Vermonter reservist?”

The need to activate Vermont reservists for hurricanes Katrina and Ike are easily understood as critical support for humanitarian relief.  The need to activate Vermont reservists to serve in Iraq or Afghanistan is also understood as necessary military support for our full-time service men and women.  We all understand that a soldier's duty is to serve whenever he or she is called to active service.

But it's becoming politically curious why so many Vermont reservists serve considerably longer tours than the Brian Dubie. 

In September 2005, Brian Dubie served for only two weeks while 115 members of the Vermont Guard remained in New Orleans until the work was complete.  Many of these soldiers had just returned from several months in Iraq.  Brian Dubie's initial duty was to coordinate air lifting equipment and supplies from Florida to Louisiana and Mississippi but his second week consisted of making face-time with such folk as the Governor of Mississippi and the Lieutenant Governor of Louisiana.  Meanwhile, 115 members of the Vermont Guard were mucking out a school in Jefferson Parrish.  Interestingly, while Vermont's soldiers remained in New Orleans, Brian Dubie came home and immediately created an exploratory committee for a possible 2006 U.S. Senate campaign.  His explanation at the time was that he returned home “with a heightened motivation to serve the people of Vermont at a higher level.” 

As we recall, Brian Dubie's exploratory committee didn't green light his ambition to serve in Washington. However, for the trouble of his two-week tour, the Lieutenant Governor earned a second Meritorious Service Medal.  This is no small honor, since such a medal is one of the highest awarded for non-combat service.  In most cases, soldiers similarly recognized earn this medal after three years in a full-time military career.  One soldier earned the Meritorious Service Medal after three years of service including relief aid in response to Hurricane Ivan.  

In September 2006, Brian Dubie served a two week tour in Baghdad.  Hundreds of Vermonter reservists were called to active service almost two years earlier on lengthy tours, taxing their family's financial and emotional resources, such is the nature of military service.  Brian Dubie, keeping his job as a commercial airline pilot while serving minimally as Vermont's Lieutenant Governor, was called to active service on a largely unspecified mission.  He flew off once again, only this time Dubie dismissed his responsibility to Vermont's chain of command by failing to inform House Speaker Gaye Symington, the next in command, of his absence.  Once again, it seems as if the objective of his mission was to make face-time with military leaders.  And once again, upon his return, Brian Dubie came forward with another bold proposal in form of a vow:  to move Vermont and the United States away from foreign oil.  In his own words:

It was a mid-September evening. I stood on a rooftop with one of the three Commanding Generals, overlooking the city of Baghdad. The city was beautiful at night, but it was not peaceful.

“Brian,” he said, “America has to declare its freedom from oil that comes from dangerous parts of the world.”

Late that same night, in a Blackhawk helicopter flying at very low altitude, the team I was part of left Baghdad for northern Iraq. I looked down as we passed over sleeping Iraqi villages, and I thought about the general's words. I vowed, “When I get home to Vermont, I will make it a priority to find a way to move our state and our nation away from foreign oil.”

Now here we are in September 2008, and once again Brian Dubie is called to service in the midst of an electoral season.  As with his first week of service in response to Hurricane Katrina, he is coordinating air lifts of personnel and supplies from Tyndell Air Force Base in Florida in response to Hurricane Ike.  Unlike the prior tours of duty, this time he's projected to spend only seven days, scheduled to return on September 19th.  We can't predict what new ambition or vow he will come home with this time, but we can be confident that the political storyline will be considerably less compelling than Dubie's return home in 2005 and 2006.  The situation is different this time.  As a nation, our fears invoked by the war on terrorism and the intensity of storms have been tempered with political fatigue and a shift of concern toward the recession, our national debt and the continuing mortgage crisis meltdown.  Closer to home Brian Dubie's seven day trip to Florida will be received in a different way than it has been before.  This time, any reception of the Lieutenant Governor in the headlines or front page photos will stand in stark contrast to another call to active duty.

Vermont reservist and current State Auditor, Thomas Salmon, was deployed to the Middle East a full two months ago with no estimated time of arrival back home any time soon.  The difference between Salmon's open-ended commitment and Dubie's one or two-week stints begs a comparison between national service and political showmanship.  The difference is almost embarrassing.  Vermont's Auditor of Accounts and Lieutenant Governor are statesman and servicemen both.  Yet Salmon has been deployed for an undetermined length of time while making the assumed sacrifices in family life and job security widely known among soldiers during a time of war.  Meanwhile, Dubie jets out and back in a matter of days in what appears to be little more than a symbolic reminder of his strong military connections.

In full disclosure, I challenged Brian Dubie on this issue in June, at the outset of my recent primary campaign for Lieutenant Governor.  In the full text of my announcement letter I referred to Dubie's two-week trip to Baghdad as a “tour of glory” and I continue to stand behind my words since, now that the Lieutenant Governor has been called to serve on three occasions, each time serving no more than 14 days, the pattern of glory soldiering seems to be confirmed.

Brian Dubie is unquestionably a good and decent man.  He is a family man and there seems to be no doubt of his commitment to the safety of children.  He is a patriot and his interest in green energy and technology and green valleys are admirable.  He has a high standard of personal integrity and deep roots in his community.

But as I mentioned to him in a quick sit-down conversation at an endorsement event taking place at the Quechee Inn in July, as parents of children, as school board members and fellow Vermonters, we must respect each other's personal qualities and private life at the beginning of the day and at the end of the day.  However, in public life and in politics it is our job to challenge each other to the best of our ability as we bring voice to the question Vemonters are asking in more private spaces. One of the responsibilities of leadership in a democracy is to ask the obvious questions and offer a vigorous, informed challenge against our opponents as we strive for success. 

Why are Brian Dubie's tours of duty so much shorter than any other Vermonter reservist?  What kind of reception will he expect from Vermonters this third time should he announce interest in another public position or make a glorious vow against the ills of our time?  And what should Vermonters begin to expect from any Lieutenant Governor in the question of commitment to service?