All posts by metamind

Fear of knowledge

Bush's latest statement about Iran's nuclear program causes me to wonder on what legal basis he is asserting “Iran must be prevented from having the KNOWLEDGE of making nuclear weapons.” (sic)

Excuse me, but when did KNOWLEDGE become an international crime?

Am I the only one who finds this peculiar? Knowledge is the basis of freedom. Bush is asserting “Iran cannot be free.” Knowledge provides the power of choice. You don't have a choice until you have the knowledge of how to do something. But just because you have the knowledge does not mean you will actually do it.

Crimes have always been actions, not KNOWLEDGE of actions. Knowledge must be free so we can be free to choose our own course in life, whether we are considering a choice as an individual or a nation.

The result of this kind of rhetoric is a justification for war based on a false idea, that we are better off ignorant. It is akin to a “thought crime” at the nation-state level of human organization.

Bush is telling Iran “Don't even think about making a nuclear weapon. We consider it a crime.” That's a threat for war and Bush is totally wrong for making it. Nobody has the right to assert ignorance is necessary for another.

We must learn to develop human systems which “trust and verify” our abilities to make good decisions.

Trying to control access to knowledge is foolhardiness at best and a recipe for war at worst.

Bush is trying to assert the right to wage war based on “fear of knowledge.”

Impeachment is necessary.

Justice requires it.

Steve Moyer

http://stevemoyer.us

Cost of the Iraq war

I spoke with a soldier who told me he was offered 97,000 a month to join Blackwater as a private contracter in Iraq.   I've heard that there are now more private contracters than soldiers.

 

Differences between Eugene Oregon and Burlington Vermont

I'm in Eugene Oregon now and I'm finding quite a lot of differences between Eugene and Burlington.   First of all, Eugene is about five times large in population.   It also sits next to Springfield, Oregon which is a blue collar town.  Eugene is a university city, much like Burlington, home to the University of Oregon. 

 The bus service here is excellent.  They have one free bus the “EmX” which goes from Eugne to Springfield every ten minutes in its own travel lane of a six-lane main street.  That makes seven lanes total!  It's fast and efficient, a state-of-the-art marvel in bus transportation.

 Another difference is the fact that you can buy a day-pass for bus transportation for only $2.50.  A one-way fare is $1.25, just like in Burlington.  But Burlington doesn't sell day passes.  What a difference it makes in terms of economic activity if you don't need to worry about paying another bus fare every time you want to go somewhere.

For example, there is a bus which runs about 60 miles out of Eugene into the Cascade Mountains.  Yes, it's a CITY bus and only costs $1.25.  You can take you bike on it too.  That means that you could commute into Eugene in the morning, take a few buses around town, and return to your country home for the total of only $2.50 a day.  For $35 you can get a montly pass.  What a deal!

Bicycles are very popular here and the most stolen item in town.  Theft seems to be the big crime in Eugene.

Food is cheaper too, by a long shot.  I bought broccoli for 99 cents a pound yesterday.  Fruits and vegetables in general are better and cheaper here.

Rents are cheaper too.  I could get an apartment here for much less than $500 a month, perhaps for $350.  When I arrived in Eugne I stayed in a Hostel for $22.  It was a nice clean place too.  I learned that there is another hostel which is about the same price.  Where is the Burlington Hostel anyway?  I tried to find it once but couldn't.

Here's a URL with some comments from others about Eugene.

http://www.hostelz.com/hostels/USA/Oregon/Eugene

I'd say this place has more “hippie culture” than Burlington does.

It also has a more active anarchist culture.  It's liberal but with a “Big Brother is watching” attitude about it.  Eugene has a history of hassling vagrants. The homeless shelter is run by a religious group and the equivalent of the “Day Station” is run by another religious group.  The Catholics are big in providing food and services here.  It has a distinctively more Christian feel than Burlington does.

The Pacific Ocean is about an hour away.  The Cascades are about an hour away in the opposite direction.  So you can cool off at the beach or at the hot springs in the mountains.  If you want a big city, Portland is about two hours north of here.

Marijuana is plentiful and virtually legal.  Actually, one of my friends here has a grower's permit for medical marijuana, both for himself and another person.  I've seen his plants in the back room .. about two dozen.  He doesn't have to hide the grow room or the bags of pot laying around.  It's quite nice to be “out from under” the oppressive thumb of government.  There are 15,000 Oregonians who have permits to use medical marijuana, mostly for pain reasons.  7,000 new applications have been filed in the past year.

See http://www.oregon.gov/DHS/ph/ommp/data.shtml  for details.

Oregon is a big state, compared to Vermont, which is a small state.

Oregon votes by mail … everyone does.  It seems to work fine for them.  Talk about paper ballots …. it works.

Oregon has no sales tax.  It's really quite nice to pay the price advertised rather than that price PLUS sales tax.  At some pleaces in Vermont the sales tax seems to be close to ten percent.  That makes a difference.

Cigarettes are cheaper here but not by much and the Governor wants to add a 65 cent per pack tax.  States everywhere are looking for ways to increase revenue.  

I'm thinking of presenting my Vermont Freedom Currency idea ( http://stevemoyer.us/vfc ) to Oregon as well.  We need to “crack the egg” on the money system, the idea that the banks control our lives through the debt mechanism.  We can have more than one way to get what we need.  We simply need to break out of the box which I call the “tyranny of money.”  Perhaps Oregonians will be open to the idea.

 Steve Moyer

 

 

What is the quality of your consciousness?

I just finished watching a movie called “Turtles can Fly” which was an Iraqi-Iranian movie.  It’s difficult for me to summarize the movie, other than to say it is about the effects of war on the children of the region.

http://www.metacriti…

After seeing the movie I was watching the snow fall outside and realizing how peaceful it was here and yet how disturbed I am about everything that is going on now.  Then I asked myself the question: “What is the quality of my consciousness?”

We have been hurt in so many ways by George Bush and the Republicans.  It’s much bigger than them, of course, because we do it to ourselves every day.  When we focus on money we lose focus on quality.  The more we focus on quantity, whether it is troops in Iraq or dollars for the mortgage, the more the quality of our consciousness deteriorates.  It’s a subtle, slow deterioriation which happens over time.

I feel so cheated. I remember times when my consciousness was much clearer, much more focused on hopefulness and positive realities.  Now it looks like we are going deeper into war and depression.  It feels like such an evil spell has been cast upon us.  How will we break this spell?

What needs to be done?  We need a new system but this one must fail before we can get it.  That seems to be the truth.  Is it true?  Is that the truth of our situation?  Are we waiting for the fall, lacking the courage to do anything until it happens?  Are we waiting for Armegeddon?  Is there a better alternative?

What needs to be done?

The Virtual Negotiating Table

I’ve heard too many times that “there is no GOOD solution” to the Iraq situation.  This is false. There is a good solution:  negotiation.  The challenge is how you to get warring parties together in the same room, around the same table.

The answer is to use the Internet.  The “virtual negotiating table” could be a modified version of Wikipedia to include proposals and counter-proposals, where every participant could edit any proposal, combine elements of different proposals, and so forth.

This is the technology of peace.  Domination isn’t going to work in my opinion unless we are willing to kill a whole lot of people.  The ones left standing would agree to anything to remain standing.  That’s hardly a good outcome.

Check out some of the new developments on the web:

http://ross.typepad….

http://ross.typepad….

http://www.politicop…

http://wikinomics.co…

De-centralize seach engines on the net

Google has become THE search engine.  We need to de-centralize the search engine function which essential to finding appropriate resources on the net.

Money concentrates wealth and power in the hands of the few.  Google is a prime example of how this works.  The more money they make, the more they can spend on development of their search engine(s) and the more faith people have in them BECAUSE they have the money and the power.

Monopolies are the natural result of a money-oriented system.  Some people refer to this as a capitalistic system, but it’s really more about the way money works.  It’s all about quantity without any necessity for quality.
The counterargument is that people will only give their money to a company which provides a quality product or service.  But this isn’t true with Google, because Google doesn’t charge the consumer of their services.

Google is doing evil, despite their company motto “Don’t do evil” because money itself is inherently evil.  It prioritizes money over morality, quantity over quality, and profit over principle.

The principle of a search engine should be to provide users with the BEST resources for their search request.  But profit overrules this in a number of ways.  You can get top placement on the page by paying money to Google.  Why are you the first line on the page?  Quantity.  You have the money to pay for that placement.  Quality is sacrificed for profit.

It’s evil, plain and simple.  It’s why we need to de-centralize the search functions we use on the net.  How can this be done?  Well, traditionally government plays a role in breaking up monopolies and preventing concentration of power in the hands of the few.  But government hasn’t done anything to stop this phenomenon on the Internet.

Government could do a great deal by simply creating a technical data standard for sharing search engine information.  This could be a voluntary standard which programmers like myself would happily comply with if we knew that the result would be distribution of quality data with attribution ( where it came from ). 

The attribution funciton of a government standard requires another standard … a standard internet identity.  Currently you can buy a domain name ( like yahoo.com or google.com ) for about ten dollars per year.  It’s a form of identity, but not a good one.  There are ways to disguise your identity and hide your true identity from users of your domain services.

The government could provide an alternative service for registering your name, whether a personal identity or a business identity, with a government agency.  The government could maintain the database of “who’s who on the Internet” and regulate it so that the public would have confidence that they were dealing with people and businesses who have established a quality identity. ( accurate, reliable and constant )

The third standard needed is one for rating any piece of information.  This would include rating individuals, companies, and even a specific web site or search engine record.  Everything needs to be ratable and the ratings need to be shared in the open, without any copyright protection for the ratings, so that everyone can collect, process and re-distribute rating data without concern of legal liability.

That’s how we can turn the Internet in a new direction, a direction in service of building a better world rather than simply focused on profit and the concentration of wealth and power in the hands of the few.

Steve Moyer
http://stevemoyer.us

The hard way to proceed towards social evolution

It occured to me that we are constantly struggling against the WRONG ideas, those ideas which have already been dismissed by most people as “unvirtuous” or “unworthy of consideration.”

The current push to “surge” the troop levels is such an idea.  WE THE PEOPLE have already spoken on this idea in the last election. It was a clear and pointed message: GET OUT OF IRAQ.  Now the exact reserve action is being contemplated:  GET INTO IRAQ MORE!

This is how it has been under Republicans, particularly President Bush and his ilk.

We are doing the WRONG THING first and then having to turn around and do the RIGHT THING.  The resistance to doing the right thing is immense and unrelenting, even after WE THE PEOPLE have spoken clearly and definitely.

Societies can evolve when the good ideas are heard and appreciated at the highest levels of social organization …. government, business, religion, etc.

When good ideas are dismissed or obscured by bad ideas being pounded into us by leaders and media and money …. then we have a hard time at proceeding at the task of evolutionary progress.

Progress is a good thing. It should not be encumbered by disruptive or delaying tactics.  It should be sought by everyone all of the time.  The idea that some people want things to “stay the same” should be the idea which is challenged.  Things are always changing, that’s the one constant in the universe we can certainly proclaim as truth.  The question becomes one of HOW they are changing … for the better or for the worse .. and this becomes the focus of progressive leadership: change things for the BETTER.

THe more time and energy we spend overcoming resistance to change for human progress the less human progress we are able to achieve in any given amount of time. 

Republicans have been so abusive to America recently.

Never vote Republican.

Steve Moyer
http://stevemoyer.us

On Gerald Ford and Good Leadership

Once again I see the Republican-controlled media going overboard with the “mourning of Gerald Ford.”
Excuse me for my impudent attitude, but the man was 93 years old.  Why are we mourning his death?  He lived a good long life.  Did we expect him to live forever?

As far as the quality of his leadership, it was a mixed bag in my opinion.  He had some good qualities.  He seemed to be an honest, decent man who wanted to do the right things.  But he did one gigantic thing which was wrong … he pardoned Richard Nixon.  It wasn’t that I thought Nixon shouldn’t be pardoned … which was my opinion at the time … but that the WAY he did it prevented any honest investigation of WHAT Nixon had done.

If we had that investigation back in the 1970’s we might not have a criminal in the White House today.  Gerald Ford prevented the TRUTH from being revealed to the American people.  That was his big WRONG action.

Consequently, we are now in a state of mind where many people feel impeachment procedings against another Republican President who has asserted to be “above the law” by his actions and words is unnecessary, resulting in a continuing threat to our liberty and Constitutional democracy.

This is the dangerous and wrong-headed legacy of President Gerald Ford: “Investigation should be stopped.”

Democratic Speaker-to-be Nancy Pelosi has done a similar wrong by proclaiming “There will be no impeachment.”  Excuse me?  The purpose of impeachment is to “hear the evidence” in the open investigation and debate to be held in the House of Representatives.  That’s EXACTLY what this nation needs to UNIFY itself …. around the truth.  If we don’t hear it, we can’t unify around it.  Investigation is necessary.

Why do our leaders so often fail to get the point that leadership comes FROM the truth, not from a person or a party?

Whatever good things Gerald Ford did as President will forever be overshadowed by the single gigantic evil act he did … preventing honest investigation of the crimes of Richard Nixon … with his pardon.

Pardon should not be granted BEFORE a conviction is reached, only afterwards.  If President Ford had waited until after the conviction of Richard Nixon I would have another opinion.  But so as it is he has failed the nation and the Constitution and shall forever live in disgrace in my mind.

There is no substitute for the truth.  In order to know it we must seek it.  That means investigation.

Are the Democrats paying attention?  I hope so.

Steve Moyer
http://stevemoyer.us

Election Analysis: A Mandate for Democracy


Read this on the WWW

The 2006 Election : A Mandate for Democracy

“Our will shall be done.” – The American People

“When the people fear the government, that is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, that is liberty.”
  — Thomas Jefferson


By Steve Moyer

The party’s over.  Republican party dominance, that is.  The mighty Goliath has fallen.
  We can now enjoy a breath of fresh air. Congress is controlled by the
Democratic Party.  We have an opportunity for a new direction.  The ideal is happening now.

The exit polls told us that 42 percent of voters said that corruption was an extremely important issue
in this election, more important than terrorism (40 percent), the economy (39 percent) and the
war in Iraq (37 percent).  WHAT has been corrupted?  Our virtue has been corrupted.
Our honesty, our truthfulness, our peacefulness and our compassion have been corrupted.
These things are
virtues
.

It was the independent voters who made the difference in this election,
a trend which will continue as Americans seek an alternative to the two-party system.
  If you want your vote to matter more then you too should become an independent.

Responsibility and Control

We need to understand the difference between “responsibility” and “control.”  Responsibility
is a virtue we share.  No single individual controlled the outcome of the 2006 election.  But
some of us accepted responsibility for that outcome, either by running for office, voting or simply supporting the truth with
our words and deeds. Whatever you did to help achieve this result, I am grateful to you
for your contribution. Thank you!

We are all richly blessed when we succeed
in removing evil people from positions of power and authority.
Evil is “unnecessary destruction” and the Republicans have done a lot of it the past
six years. Humanity can breathe a little easier now that they have been removed
from dominance in our government.


Election Analysis

The Republican spin-masters tried to make this election about the War on Terror, Iraq or George Bush.
But the truth is that it was a referendum on Republicans and we
rejected them.

In a positive way, Americans voted for Democracy, for an end to
the contempt for the rule of law shown by George Bush and his “rubber-stamp Congress.”
Speaker Nancy Pelosi has interpreted this result as a call for “bi-partisanship” but I think
it would be better stated as a call for “cooperation towards consensus.”

Americans embraced democracy, respect for the rule of law and the system of checks and balances
written into the Constitution. They voted to support a more virtuous Congress, one oriented towards
service to the needs of the people.
The statement which best summarizes this sentiment is:

“Our will SHALL be done.”


My Senate Campaign

It’s all about the truth. We have a right to know the truth.
In light of this understanding, I wish to share some of the details of my Campaign for the U.S. Senate in Vermont

As King Solomon said in the Bible …”all is vanity.”  Still, wisdom exists and
needs to be shared in order to further human progress and the continuing evolution of a more
virtuous society.

There are more reasons to run for public office than to win an election.
As far as I know, I am the only candidate who ran against the entire Republican party
nationwide. I ran as an independent for the open U.S. Senate seat in Vermont left by retiring

Senator James Jeffords (I).

From the

beginning of my campaign

on June 18, 2005, over 16 months ago,  I established the goal to “make the Republican party go away …. forever.”
My initial press release stated:

“I am running against the Republican party and for the cause of

virtue

in society.” said Moyer
today. “America has lost it’s virtue. Our government is like a juvenile delinquent who has been
caught lying, cheating and stealing. Our response has been to give him a credit card, a bottle of
vodka, and the keys to the family car. This government is drunk on power, irresponsible with money,
and dangerous behind the wheel.”

My campaign mantra was “Republicans are evil. Never vote Republican.”  This mantra came to me
by pondering the question: “What WILL work?”  Americans love simplicity. These two short sentences
provided a simple problem/solution diagnosis.  As more and more Republican scandals unfolded during the
campaign, from Duke Cunningham to Tom Delay to Jack Abramoff and Thomas Foley, people started to
resonate with my message.

When I started my campaign many people were despairing with the “perceived reality”
that it was impossible to remove the Republicans. Karl Rove had cast a spell on America
that the Republicans were “unbeatable” and even publicly proclaimed that he was
engineering a

“permanent one-party government.”

Most of the major media had become hapless cheerleadering sycophants for George Bush and the Republican
party line, obediently reciting Karl Rove’s “talking points” without seriously challenging their inane absurdity.
( “They hate freedom.” )
Republican propaganda told us we had a “liberal media” but actually it was a “Republican media”
working to support Republican dominance in American politics.

A liberal media would be focused on ideas such as Bill Moyers’
“A World of Ideas”
PBS series.

Given this political climate my goal seemed quite impractical and unreasonable, even to me.
Still,  I persisted in the faith that it needed to be done to save our nation and chart
a positive course for humanity. I knew that Republicans were evil
because they refused to honor the truth by seeking, speaking and supporting it and because
they had conspired as a group to create an illegal, immoral and irresponsible war for the
purpose of capital conquest.  They needed to be stopped.

Some of my friends were concerned for my welfare during this campaign, but nothing bad ever
happened to me in the physical realm.  The spiritual realm was another matter entirely,
but then how can you harm a spirit?  The “spiritual challenge” of taking down the Republicans
might be the subject of a future book if I can compel myself to recall the unpleasant details
of the experience. Ignorance is bliss.

When I started the campaign I had no job, no money, no car and only a few friends,
some of whom were afraid to be seen with me.  But I persisted anyway, regardless of how
impractical or dangerous my endeavor appeared to others.  I knew the truth.  The Republicans
needed to go down.

During the campaign I produced about a dozen public access TV programs, including some
  with positive proposals such as

“Fresh Peace for the Middle East,”

 
“Hope for Health Care”

  and

“Virtue Democracy.”

The basic problem with American politics is that it is less focused on promoting

virtue

and good ideas and more focused on money, media and moral prejudices (abortion, homosexuality, religion).

Since money is our primary focus in politics it always “wins” ( gains importance ) regardless
of which candidate wins an election.  Of course, this ignores the truth evident in
my campaign, that anyone can make a difference simply by seeking, speaking and
supporting the truth.  Why not free the public air waves so that every candidate can communicate
their message without money?  The focus on “campaign finance reform” diverts our attention
from the central issue of communicating the truth to each other.

One of my first acts was to
break the Republican spell.

Most people lack the intellectual skills to separate truth from propaganda,
to analyze and de-construct propaganda and build effective defenses against it.
The Republicans barraged us with propaganda, some of it quite sophisticated, faster than we could defend ourselves against it.  This was mentally abusive to all of us.
A professor friend offered a good term for this phenomenon: scurrilous manipulation.

For example, if you believe that the “war on terror” is necessary, then you have fallen under the spell.
You cannot have a war on a tactic and in truth war IS terror.  Waging war on terror creates more terror,
as we now clearly see in Iraq. Jesus said, “Judge by the fruits.”  The solutions are political, social and spiritual.

Consider the following “spell breaker” question:  What is the opposite of “a war on terror?”
How about “a quest for justice?”  A war on terror only creates more terror whereas a
quest for justice will create more justice.  Whatever you focus upon expands, first in your mind
and then in the outer world. The war is in our mind..

Every candidate must communicate their message to the people. I used

public access TV

,

FM community radio,

  and the
 
  Internet.
  Since I was running a national campaign in opposition to the entire Republican party and
supporting virtue in politics, I used the Internet extensively through direct email to politicians, journalists, Bloggers, activists
and political

mailing lists.

  There were many days when I sent out over a thousand individually-addressed emails which
  likely reached at least a few thousand people.

All of this communication work took a lot of time and energy but required very
little money.  I found a perfectly good fax machine in a trash dumpster and purchased
Vonage for free unlimited long distance.
I operated out of my home in the Green Mountains of Vermont. My back yard is a mountain.  Sweet!

A few days before the election I realized Harold Ford had been “Roved” by the racist

“Call me, Harold”

TV ad.
I knew that Tennessee had a racial prejudice problem and understood that Ford was finished.
Republicans are evil. Never vote Republican.  ( See how well that works? ) I had faith that Virginia
would do the right thing in the end. My faith in Virginians was well-founded even though I confess it was a nail-biter conclusion
to the election.  Thanks, George Allen.  You showed some honor in the end.

I decided to target the “Show Me” state, Missouri’s Senate race which was
a neck-in-neck tie.  I whipped my fax and email machinery into high gear
by sending content from  my
Reasons to Reject Republicans

database which I created two weeks prior to the election as my own
“October surprise.”  Judging by the results, I picked the right issue
and the right tactic at the right time.  In any case, I got the right words:  “Reject Republicans.”


I felt especially good when Missouri Democratic candidate Claire McCaskill won with a
two-point margin. Perhaps when Missourians were shown the precise
Reasons to Reject
Republicans
that it helped settle their minds.  In any case, I am pleased with the result.
  Thank you, Missouri!


Advice and counsel

My advice to the Democrats is to serve the people. Listen to them!  The Republicans stole
our democracy.  The Democrats need to return it.  Democracy is in their name.
Now they need to do it.

My advice to all Americans is to become independents, like

Senator James Jeffords (I)

did in 2001 and millions of Americans did in this election. My advice to Republicans is
to “go and sin no more.”  If they want to survive at all they need to revive their
traditional core principles of individual rights, limited government, non-intervention in world affairs
and fiscal conservatism. They were the party which supported a “balanced budget amendment” and “term limits”
in Newt Gingrich’s

Contract with America.

Republicans must stop dividing Americans by our social and religious prejudices for
the purpose of unfair political advantage.  That’s evil.  They need to honor the truth
by seeking, speaking and supporting it. They need to remember how they had sufficient
virtue to move for the impeachment of President Nixon.

Money and War

There are many reasons for the war in Iraq and the “war on terror.” The simplest reason
is the “love of money.”  The advocates of the war secretly referred to Iraq as “the prize.”
The prize is a lot of money for us.  That was the plan, anyway.
But like an addicted gambler who keeps believing that the payoff is coming soon, we
keep spending money in the hope that it will soon bring us “the prize.”

Anyone who wishes to achieve a deeper understanding of the conflict in Iraq and its
relation to money should watch two Google videos:

The History of Oil

and

Money Masters.

Our next national discussion shall be how the money system creates war by its nature.
Money is a terrible way to run our world.  We shall see
how money creates terrorism and war by its very nature. We should love people and
use money but instead we have come to love money and use people.

Money needs competition, another system for meeting human needs.  As long as three
people want to play the money game it shall exist.  But the rest of us can free
ourselves from it by getting government to create an honorable alternative to taxes.
Consider the question: What would government be about if it wasn’t about money?
It would be about forming consensus on what needs to be done.

When George Bush says that the we are in Iraq for “freedom and democracy” he is
really saying that we are there to support “money and capitalism.”
Freedom translates into money and democracy translates into “capitalism.”
The oil of Iraq is being stolen through capital contracts with US/UK corporations.
It’s legal since Iraq has a “democratic” government but it’s still evil.
Law is flawed.  Everyone knows that the Iraqi government is being propped up by our military.

The ideological conflict between Islam and the west is centered around the idea of “supreme authority.”
For Muslims this is Allah; for us it is money.  Allay versus money.  That’s the ideological
conflict put in the simplest terms possible.  Stated in philosophical terms, the conflict is
“quality versus quantity.”  Money is always about numbers … quantity … and Allah is always
about righteousness … quality.  Do you understand how they can perceive us as “The Great Satan?”
The irony is that they are fighting for freedom … freedom from the rule of money …
even if they don’t recognize it themselves.  They are fighting for the rule of righteousness.

One definition of tyranny is “no other choice” and whether you get your money from
the private sector or the government it is still the same thing : a tyranny of the soul.

Money wants all power for itself.  Money is an anti-democratic force in human affairs.
It creates conflict, revolution and war by its nature.  The idea that “money matters most” is the
idea which must be constantly challenged. Where are the true Christians nowadays?
  Rise up and make your presence known!

This is an issue for bipartisan consensus because both parties have been serving the
interests of money. Ralph Nader’s slogan “Both parties work for the same corporate paymasters”
expresses this loyalty to the “rule of money.”

Money is an evil system of domination and control for the benefit of the few at
the expense of the many.  Our steadfast refusal to discuss this issue and seek better alternatives is central to our dilemma.
Truthfully, “It’s all us. We are the problem. We are the solution.”  We need to change
our mind and our behavior.

Freedom requires

virtue
.
Democracy requires virtue. Civilization requires virtue.
Thomas Jefferson said: “Without virtue, happiness cannot be.”

Democracy requires an informed electorate ( correct information flow )  and history will show
how our mass media has been corrupted by the “love of money.” We should all be searching for “better ideas”
rather than “more money.”  People come first. Profits come second. 
Advertising has stolen our soul and sold us into economic slavery to money.
The best messages are used to promote the worst ideas.

Leadership generally comes from the fringe rather than the center.  The idea that Democrats
are going to govern in a bi-partisan “centrist” manner tells me that we are in danger of
receiving more tired excuses for failed ideas.  We need new ideas and new leadership.
Many people are trying to get our attention and contribute new ideas.  Are we listening?
We need a system for raising public awareness of good ideas.  Both parties have failed America
in this regard.

Terrorism is often a response to perceived injustice, whether real or imaginary.
The solution is a “quest for justice” rather that “competition for dominance.”
The dominant paradigm is dominance itself.  We need a new paradigm, one focused on
virtue rather than vengeance, faith rather than fear and consensus rather than control.

Our quest to dominate the oil of the Middle East is wrong.  It’s presumption is that we have
the right to dominate others because we have the most money and the strongest military.
That’s evil!

The path to justice is paved with the truth.
We need those investigations. Impeachment is a

patriotic duty

rather than a nuisance to be avoided. We must respect the rule of law in the following order:

1. Investigate.
2. Impeach.
3. Imprison.

Resolve to end political domination and economic hegemony by working for consensual solutions
to solve global problems such as poverty, oppression and terrorism.

We need to realize how terrorism
has been created with

false flag operations

to make it appear as if someone else is responsible.

Millions of Americans believe that  9/11 was a false flag operation conducted by elements of the
U.S. government to provide a justification for the invasion and occupation of Iraq (the prize).
The Republican Congress failed to honestly investigate 9/11, the biggest crime in American history.

If the Democrats are wise they will recognize that they can best “fight terror” by going after
the terrorists in our own government and changing U.S. foreign policy so that it stops terrorizing
the world. Investigations are necessary. Open hearings are necessary. Justice requires it.

Nancy Pelosi said after the election: “Democrats will lead the most honest, most open and
most ethical Congress in history.”  Let’s hold her accountable. Honest
government requires honest investigations.


Virtue Politics

I have repeatedly said that I want an END to the Republican party because Republicans
have lost their virtue.  Once they are gone, we should turn our attention to the
Democratic party and insist on a better democracy, one more representative of the people.

The two-party system is a “money conspiracy” which prevents truly virtuous leadership. I propose that we take down the two-party system by taking down one of
the two parties first, the Republican party.

The second step in my
Three Step plan for Democracy
is to get rid of the
Democratic Leadership Council (DLC)
which promotes corporate politics in Democratic drag.  We won’t need the
DLC once we start listening to the people.


The third step is to create a new political system on the Internet which gives the people
an opportunity to participate in the governance process more directly.

Parties are corrupt organizations by their nature.  Lobbyists
are corrupt by their nature.  Corporations are corrupt by their nature.
Money is corrupt by its nature because it says that control is more important than consensus.
We’ve turned our power over to corrupt institutions and a corrupt economic system.
We need a new economy but our political system is married to the existing one.

Therefore, we need a new political system first.

Parties keep the truth from being known and the people from hearing alternatives
to a two-party system.  Which party is the peace party?  Which party believes that the official
story of 9/11 is false?  Millions of Americans are in favor of a peace-oriented foreign
policy, oppose the death penalty and believe that our government was involved
in making 9/11 happen.  Which party represents these people?


The Independent Revolution

We’re fed up with both parties.  The majority of Americans consider themselves independents.
As I was gathering signatures on my ballot petitions I was often asked “What party are you?”
When I said “independent” that was usually all the information needed: “Give me the pen.”

Some people accused me of “demonizing” Republicans.  I always disagreed.  I simply
told the truth and made correct judgments.  Politics is all about judgment.  In politics we often
must choose “the lesser of two evils.”  I said that Republicans were evil because
they “dishonored the truth.”  I repeatedly said that they could “shut me up” by seeking, speaking
and supporting the truth.

When we honor the truth we speak it to the best of our ability.  When we “spin”
the truth, or only tell part of the truth so as to create a false impression,
we dishonor the truth.  That’s evil.  It is unnecessarily destructive of true understanding.

Many people associate “evil” with “hatred” but nothing could be further from the truth.
Evil is a judgment.  Hatred is an emotion.  We should love those who do evil
by telling the truth and asking them to “stop doing evil.”  It is the truth which
sets us free. Treat others the way you would wish to be treated if you were them.

If you are a public person, such as a politician or pundit, you must tell the truth in the
public realm.  If you are a private citizen, you may tell it in private.  In either
case, hearing the truth will strengthen our collective conscience.  Jerry Brown said “Speak truth to power.”
Howard Dean said “You are the power.”  Amen!

I ask all Republicans to “stop doing evil” and leave their party.  Good people do not
stand in unity with evil. The Republican party has been taken over by an evil spirit.
Is there even one Republican politician who has acknowledged the evil of their actions?

The greatest evil
we do is to deny the evil we do.
Republicans continue to act as if they have “done no wrong.”  They claim things have gone
wrong in Iraq but they don’t acknowledge how they conspired to create an aggressive war for
private profit.

I have identified 46 categories of Republican evils in my

Reasons to Reject Republicans

database and search engine.  I learned that many Republicans respond well to righteous judgment
even though it may hurt them emotionally.  It’s almost as if they need judgment to be whole.

Some of my earliest supporters were Republicans.  I still have Republican friends
and associates.  I bear no ill will towards them but I let them know what I think.
I even joke about “evil Republicans” if I think it is a tactful way to make my point.

Virtue is moral philosophy, not religion. It is the distilled wisdom of humanity.
It is “what works” in human affairs.  We teach business but we don’t teach virtue.
Why is that?  Because we worship money. Virtue is left to the religious realm but
many religious institutions have been corrupted by money.  Where are the Christians
when we need them?  Quietly living in fear of losing their tax exemption.

Many Christian evangelists essentially preach the gospel of money and power.  That’s
how Republicans rose to dominance. Christians loved money and the power of government more than righteousness.
One of the results of the election is that Christians are re-evaluating
their faith to re-align themselves with truth and righteousness.  It’s important to
be able to separate religious “stories” from truth and righteousness.

Seeking political power for the purpose of domination is not righteous.  It’s self-righteous.
There is a lot of false Christianity nowadays and moral hypocrisy in the ranks of the Republicans.
You can tell these people by their aspiration to gain power OVER others.  That’s evil.
Service is a virtue.  Domination is not.

The Pundits Spin

“If Democrats look at this as a mandate, they’re crazy!” proclaimed famous political analyst Charlie Cook.
He almost went catatonic as he furiously insisted “Nobody voted for Democrats. They voted against Republicans.”
That’s false, but it shows Charlie’s true political persuasion as a Republican.

Bush only changes course when it is absolutely essential to maintain power.  Hence, we have
crisis government with one crisis after another so that this weak leader can justify taking action.
It’s time to focus on President Bush and start beating those impeachment drums.
The push for impeachment is a worthy endeavor in itself because it produces a crisis.
Remember, Bush needs a crisis to justify action.

When someone says that the Republicans are corrupt, what is it precisely that has been corrupted?
It is their virtue. Honesty is a virtue. Respect is a virtue. Service is a virtue. Honor is a virtue.
Truthfulness is a virtue.  The Republicans have been dishonest, disrespectful, and have failed
to honor their oath to the Constitution and to serve the American people by speaking the truth.

Pelosi’s commitment to resist impeachment is wrongheaded and should be reconsidered.
How can you have an ethical Congress with an evil administration?
The fish rots from the head down. The government must be ethical in all of its branches
and operations.  I refer Speaker Pelosi to my essay entitled

“Impeachment is a patriotic duty.”


The Future

Politics should be fun.  The Republicans took the fun out of it.  They made it into
a high-stakes, high finance mind game.  That’s not fun.  That hurts! Enough already!

I have a vision for a system on the Internet which will give the people a clearer voice in government.
I call it “consensus software” or “Internet Democracy.”  There is so much focus on competition
that we have neglected an entire class of software which can be used to form consensus.
I am seeking a Senator or Representative who is willing to dedicate a small portion of his/her
staff budget to the development of this open source software for their web site.  Then everyone
can have it all over the world.

We need a system to discern quality ideas and elevate them in the public consciousness.
Advertising doesn’t work. The ideas are out there, but there is too little money to bring them to our
attention.  We need a new political system, one which is based on quality discernment of good ideas.

Parties are corrupt organizations by their nature.  Lobbyists
are corrupt by their nature.  Corporations are corrupt by their nature.
We’ve turned our power over to corrupt institutions and a corrupt economic system.
We need a new economy but the political system is married to the existing one.
So we need a new political system first.

What I want

Assertiveness is a virtue. I accepted responsibility for removing Republicans from
power and took appropriate steps to “make it so.”  I took responsibility and asserted the truth.
I am pleased with the result.

Honesty is a virtue.  I gave Vermont’s Senate seat to Bernie Sanders without a fight
so that I could save this nation from the fascism and war the Republicans were
creating for America. Towards the end of my campaign I actually told Vermonters:  “Vote for Bernie and
listen to Steve.”

Truthfulness is a virtue.  If I had

seriously challenged

Bernie Sanders I might have divided Bernie’s support sufficiently to give
Vermont’s Senate seat to the Republican, preventing Democratic control of
the Senate.

I want a job constructing an open data, open source Internet democracy
system where any citizen can create and endorse proposals.  Let’s create software
which facilitates the formation and discernment of consensus on every issue.
I want “consensus software” and I have a plan for it which has already begun
with the Vermont Democracy Network.

Scientific polls only ask the questions pollsters want to ask and we never know “who says what.”
They are biased towards conservative ideas by their nature, since we can only
be polled on well known ideas.

We need to empower citizens to create and endorse proposals in the open so we can network
with each other in support of good ideas. This requires a standardized system.  It is the
rightful responsibility of government to create the standards and the system, without any
consideration of profit or private sector competition.  In a way, it is the opposite of
the lobbying system we have now, which is an extension of the advertising idea.  Lobbyists
are basically salesmen advertising ideas to our legislators.  I view this endeavor as
“building the democratic infrastructure of the 21st Century.”  It may become an answer
to terrorism and oppression worldwide.  Even dictators can allow such a system to exist
without feeling threatened.

Independent politicians generally fail to receive partisan patronage.
I want a good job designing the software which I believe will free us from
this dysfunctional two-party system. I want a quality discernment system on
the Internet for good ideas and good leadership, a system we can give to the world as a tool
for creating better democracy, justice and an end to this abominable war on terror.

The President wants “fresh ideas” for how to solve the situation in Iraq.
I’ve already provided some in my Fresh Peace for the Middle East
proposal, but who’s listening?  I’ll provide more ideas soon but we need to have a system
where the people can endorse specific solutions on the Internet so that the politicians
will actually address those ideas which the people favor. We can do better than
“scientific” polls. We can support an open public discourse using standards which empower us
find good ideas and quality leadership.

Recognize your true leaders.  Honor them.  It’s the right thing to do.

We need process governance rather than party governance and we need to gradually
involve the American people in the process of governance.  The people are better able
to form consensus than  politicians because the people are more detached from
party power structures and the corrupting influence of money in politics.

It’s good to be right.  What was my effect in this election?  It’s difficult to say
with certainty but I know in my heart that it was significant.  If my actions had some
significant affect on the election then I deserve a good job doing something
which honors my talents.  May I have such a job, please?

I ran on “teaching virtue” and “rejecting Republicans” because they have “lost their virtue.”
The most important issue according to the exit polls was “corruption.”  What gets corrupted?
Virtue gets corrupted.  Republicans have failed to teach us virtue, much less practice it.
Republicans have taught the love of money and the lust for power through deceit, division and
domination.

We are too powerful to be  playing these silly mind games.
We must accelerate our spiritual, social and political evolution in harmony with virtue.
Technology is pushing us into the future regardless of our acceptance.  The wise course
is to adapt to the increased pace of societal change.

We need meta-evolutionary technology, tools which will help us develop techniques to
evolve human society faster, with greater wisdom and more virtue.

Most politicians talk about government programs; I talk about government standards.
Standards can empower us to “do more with less.” We can help ourselves and
reduce our dependence on government with standards.  Health care is an area
where standards could yield an immense benefit.  Imagine if there was a standard for
evaluating drugs, treatments, remedies, doctors and the entire realm of health care.

Imagine if you could endorse a natural medicine remedy or alternative medicine practitioner
in the open without fear of being sued or punished and that you could do it using a “standard identity”
so we could find those individuals who consistently show good judgment in a given area.  Share the wisdom!

This doesn’t require centralization if we have standards.  The data can exist on
10,000 different computers on the Internet and be shared dynamically using programs
called agents to collect and process the data into meaningful information and advice.
This requires standards for data and “correct information flow.”

The “more with less” paradigm decreases the size, scope and control of government while
increasing the freedom and quality of life for the people.  In order to accomplish it we need
to focus on three things;  virtue, communication and standards.

Such a system could prevent the nation from entering into unwise military actions or at
least leave a clear record of who opposed it for future reference. We need to know
who gets it right and who gets it wrong.

Politics is all about good judgment.  Who has good judgment?  If we only have TV ads
to answer this question we are depending on money to tell us how to vote.  We need to
accept responsibility and tell the truth to each other in an open system on the Internet.


Conclusions

It’s all about the truth.  Justice requires the truth.  We rejected
Republicans because they dishonored the truth, misleading Americans into believing that
reality is a perception and that truth is irrelevant..

Responsibility is a virtue we share.  Control is a deceptive illusion.  Democracy requires
the truth. Idealism is a virtue. Seriousness is a spiritual illness.  Put all of this
together and you can get the “cosmic giggle.”

I lost my campaign for the Senate. America re-claimed its democracy.  I’m responsible.

The virtue of Congress has been corrupted by the love of money.
We need a new political system. An increasing number of Americans are moving away from
the two-party system because it has failed to represent them.
The political parties are more interested in attaining and preserving their own power
than in creating a truly democratic republic.
This problem requires an “out-of-the-box” solution.

The quality of communication between constituents and their representatives must be improved.
Political networks are the future.  They can empower us to focus on finding good ideas.
We need to create a better democratic infrastructure for the 21st century, one that utilizes the Internet to
increase citizen participation in the governance process.

Citizens must come to feel that they can influence policy in a more direct manner
rather than only through campaign contributions to their representatives.  Citizens need to be given the opportunity to work directly on the
legislative process, forming coalitions and consensus around specific ideas and proposals.

We need a system which will help us guide our elected leaders to govern wisely, to make intelligent
choices based on quality information.  This will solve the problem of partisanship in government.

The impact of the Internet on our consciousness is vastly under-rated in my
opinion. Let’s use it intelligently to unify around good ideas and quality leadership,
expanding democracy to include all of us.

  “Enlighten the people generally, and tyranny and oppressions of body and mind

will vanish like evil spirits at the dawn of day,” — Thomas Jefferson


Steve Moyer,  RR 1 Box 60, Warren, VT 05674
802-583-2163 (h)  802-882-1969 (o)

Resons to Reject Republicans

PRESS RELEASE – for immediate release

For more info: 802-882-1967 or 202-370-6653

Senate Candidate creates search engine to catalog Republican sins

Warren, Vermont

October 24, 2006

Reference: Reasons to Reject Republicans

Steven Moyer, an independent candidate for the U.S. Senate in Vermont, has created a web search engine to collect information on Republican crimes, misdeeds and unethical behavior.  The search engine is called “Reasons to Reject Republicans”  and includes links to articles on the web as well as videos at YouTube and Google Video. Moyer’s goal is raise awareness of Republican misdeeds by archiving at least 1,000 records of information by the time of the election.

“I’m fed up with the Republican party,”  said Moyer. “They have done so many evil deeds that I’ve lost count, so I started this database to raise public awareness and hold them accountable.”  The database allows any visitor to enter information including links to web sites, videos and audio files. It can be searched by keyword like Google and other web search engines. 

Each entry includes a “reason” to reject Republicans, a 50-word maximum summary statement, and a category.  Categories include “cronyism, false Christianity, greed,  incompetence, excessive secrecy, propaganda, bribery, corruption, graft, militarism, and war profiteering.” 

Users can add their own categories and include up to 32,000 characters of additional text ( 6,000 words ) with each entry, as well as a quote and three links to web resources ( web pages, video and audio files ).

“The Republican party has crossed the line of acceptable political behavior,” said Moyer.  “I want the Republican party to go away … forever!”  Moyer believes that one of the worst Republican evils  has been the war in Iraq. “The Republicans conspired to create an aggressive war for the purpose of capital
  conquest.  That’s not just a bad idea —  it’s evil!”  Moyer also believes that Republicans have stolen several  of the recent elections with “black box” voting machines and voter intimidation techniques. 

“We need to throw these people out of government at every level. I want a landslide rejection of the entire Republican party at every level of government.  We need a new kind of politics based on virtues, like honesty, compassion and justice, rather than deceit, division and domination.”

The database and search engine is located at  http://reason.stevem… 

  Moyer plans to allow visitors to e-mail searches from the database to their friends.  He also plans to offer the entire database on CD-ROM to those who want to collaborate by running the program on their web site and sharing the data in an open-data, open-source network.

  “Political networks are the wave of the future.  Political parties are the dinosaurs of the past. In the future, many of the functions of democratic government will be accomplished using the Internet.  But first we need to reject the Republicans because they have lost their virtue and done great damage to the nation, our democracy and the world at large.”

Moyer is responsible for the first online copy of a statewide voter registration database which he claims is the “logical starting point” of an Internet Democracy.  The Vermont Democracy Network is located at http://vermont.steve…

###