All posts by Caoimhin Laochdha

About Caoimhin Laochdha

Central Vermont life-long civil liberties activist. I offset my carbon footprint by growing my own energy and riding my bicycle at least 8 months of the year. Every election cycle, since Gerald Ford's social promotion to the Oval Office, I've volunteered for at least one Democratic presidential campaign that ultimately finished in second (or lower) place.

Move Vermont’s Primary to June

(Re-promoting a diary from February that’s timely… – promoted by odum)

Primaries can and should be healthy for the Democratic party. They certainly benefit voters by offering more and better choices and we should embrace the opportunities primaries offer to vet policies, candidates and ideas. 

The timing of post-Labor Day primary elections, however, will more likely hurt a winner.  Fall primaries risk being counter-productive to the democratic process because they occur too close to the General Election in November. 

Vermont's election year primary needs to happen earlier.  Town Meeting day (March) is too early, but June is late enough to do the job.  Once the calendar hits July & the summer months, it is too late to have a truly effective primary.

Scot nails it with his spot-on comment at the Open Thread, —

We Need A Primary

[W]e need a full fledged primary to rally the troops and get us engaged in taking out the Governor.

Deb, Susan, Doug and others would all be fantastic candidates. Everyone should dive in and may the best candidate win. I mean, when was the last time we had a three-way primary for Governor?

It will make the nominee stronger.

Could not agree more.

We need good candidates running in our primaries, and we need primaries that serve voters by showcasing our best candidates. We will continue to have neither as as long as the primary occurs in the fall rather than before the summer months.

More on better nominees and a better process, after the flip. . .

  — IT IS TIME TO DITCH THE SEPTEMBER PRIMARY

Primaries are good for rallying troops, preparing candidates and sharpening campaign skills. They are great for all-around voter education and general awareness.  Vermont Democrats have been deprived of well fought primaries lately, and it's a shame.

The Democrats have an excellent bench, but a generally untested one too. The Democrats' bench is also populated by people who generally do not answer to voters, particularly liberal voters, in state-wide primary elections. The democratic process can do better, much better.

The current September primary is not challenger-friendly, and it is definitely not voter-friendly.  Unless the goal is to protect incumbents or to drag out intra-party campaigning until the last few weeks before the November election, there is no rationale for a September primary.

In this – the 21st Century media age of continual campaigning by incumbent office holders – there is no good rationale to run the primary all the way into September.

Voters do not need months and months of in-house/intra-party debates. The benefit of a normal (spring) primary date, is that we can see candidates differentiate themselves relative to how they will run the state for the better part of the campaign. The current calendar suffocates the process by dedicating most of election year to the contest within candidates' respective parties.  

Consider:

1. The September primary hurts primary winners because they spend the vast majority of their resources (particularly time, one of the biggest, most critical, resources) keeping the fight in-house.

2. The September primary hurts voters because it discourages potential candidates from entering into primaries in the first place, or a candidate may wait until it is realistically too late to enter. 

3.  The September primary REALLY hurts primary loser(s) who spend an entire summer campaigning for a job they will not have.  This dynamic discourages people from entering the primaries or running for office in the first place. (See #2).

4. The September primary hurts the eventual winner, particularly challengers to incumbents, because there is little time to shift gears and refocus on the incumbent. (See ## 1, 2 & 5))  The person most likely never to see a primary is your generic incumbent.  And incumbents love watching their future opponents drawing friendly fire up until a few short weeks before the November election. 

5.  The September primary REALLY hurts the primary winner. When candidates treat the voters to a particularly healthy and hard fought primary, the eventual mid-September winner has, effectively, LESS THAN TEN (10) BUSINESS DAY REMAINING to finish raising the bulk of money needed for General Election media buys.  Sure you want to have that fundraising done months earlier, but try it sometime.

The General Assembly is already considering changes to Title 17 (Vermont's election statutes) this session (For instance, see S. 35, it's a shitty bill but it's a start). The General Assembly badly needs to refocus on the primary date instead of focusing exclusively on fixing the decade old and unconstitutional finance provisions.  Setting a reasonable primary date needs to be the top priority.

The legislature needs to act now. It needs to fix its campaign finance problem and set a reasonable primary date. If the Legislature does not fix this problem THIS SESSION, it is not going to happen in time for 2010.  There is no time to waste. 

September primaries are anachronistic.

September primaries are incumbent protection rackets.

There are bills in the hopper to fix Vermont's invalid, unconstitutional and court-rejected campaign finance law. The first order of business should be to put into any new election laws a workable primary date.

Fix the primary and we take one big step toward fixing the problem of too little voter choice.

Marriage Equality — Friday at the State House

This Friday morning, at the State House, is visibility day for marriage equality. Fellow-traveling defenders of individual liberty and defenders of the right to marry will be meeting in Montpelier starting at 8:00 a.m. 

Folks will be walking the halls of the State House and discussing equal justice for all Vermonters throughout the morning and early afternoon.

This is a good chance to come to Montpelier, see your Representatives and Senators in the General Assembly and tell them how important equal marriage rights are to you as a voter, a constituent, a Vermonter and an American.

Vermont has one of the lowest divorce rates in the country, and it’s no surprise. Vermont gives partial legal recognition to gay and lesbian couples through civil unions. Obviously, increasing the level of mutual support (and perhaps the level of  competition too!) for legal coupling in Vermont – through Civil Unions – has been a healthy shot in the arm to all types of family units. As we've seen in Vermont, legal recognition of a family leads to greater respect for all unions — homosexual and heterosexual.

But remember, civil unions is just a first step. Partial legal recognitation is not the same as equality just like being 3/5 a constitutional human is not the same as equal rights for all. 

It is time we recognized the fact that marriage equality is a measure of how civil society respects marriage, it is how our Government respects our rights as Vermonters. And, as advocates, it is how we respect ourselves as members of a healthy community.  

Friday's details after the flip . . . 

Please consider coming to Montpelier on Friday to meet with your elected representatives.

Here is the schedule of events (complinments of DFA)

SCHEDULE FOR THE DAY
(Welcome all day! Most important part is 11am-1pm):

8am Organizational Displays in the Card Room

9am Legislative Update and Advocacy Training in Room 10

10am Introductions of on the House Floor

11am Community Meeting with the Governor in the Ceremonial Office

Noon Meetings with House and Senate legislators

1pm Organizational Updates/Luncheon

2pm Wrap-up and close

If you are not sure who you want to meet when you arrive, the list of legislators is here.

Also, the good folks at the Vermont Freedom to Marry can help direct your citizen’s voice to the right person in Montpelier.

THE FIRST VERMONT PRESIDENTIAL STRAW POLL (for links to the candidates exploratory committees, refer to the diary on the right-hand column)!!! If the 2008 Vermont Democratic Presidential Primary were

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

One Sentence – One Syllable – One Second

Here it comes.  The trolls are coming out of the closet to lament how the General Assembly, in this coming 2009 session, will not have no time to pass a law giving equal marriage rights to all Vermonters.

The chorus is chiming in and the preemptive song is that the General Assembly will be legislating 24/7 and Eight.Days.A.Week to get a handle on all the policy problems — social, fiscal, legal, economic, regulatory,environmental, health care, educational etc. ad nauseam that are gripping our State. Last I heard it was the Republicans and conservatives who tanked the economy – the same people who are so concerned (at the mention of marriage equality) that only the economy should have our attention.

But does that mean that justice necessarily goes on the back burner?

Here is the deal folks: One sentence of Vermont law needs to be changed. One syllable (“All those in favor . . . “AYE”) needs to be uttered on the floor of the House and Senate; AND the Governor needs to take just one measly second to sign his James Douglas Hancock to the legislation. Then it's done. It's a big deal, it's important, it's a huge step, but it doesn't have to be any more complicated than that. The work is already done, we know the problem, we have the solution. Let's get it done.

Say it with me —

One Sentence  *  One Syllable One Second

One Sentence in Title 15 of the Vermont Code to fix. Just one.  One Syllable to utter. Just one.  One Second to put pen to paper. Just one.  That is all it will take to end marital inequality in Vermont.

One Sentence  *  One Syllable One Second

(there' more, about how little it takes, on the flip) 

Kudos to Senator John Campbell (D-Windsor) who already announced that marriage equality was back in the hopper for 2009. This is a policy and justice issue that we should expect all Democrats to support this session.

When this equality for Vermonters issue comes to the State House, we will hear “there is no time.” That will be the opposition argument because their true opposition, which is “we hate, we fear,” is an argument most conservatives are smart enough – at least in public – not to admit in civil company.

The issue, however, is not what problems are more pressing or more important or more time consuming. The fact is, we have more problems than the General Assembly can possibly fix – a huge frustration to all of us.  No, the issue is what are the problems that the General Assembly CAN FIX? Marital equality for same gender couples is one that they can fix.

One Sentence

One Syllable

One Second

There is one sentence in the Vermont code that needs to be changed. ONE SENTENCE. It reads:

Marriage is the legally recognized union of one man and one woman. 15 V.S.A. § 8. 

Change that one sentence to: 

“Marriage is the legally recognized union of two people.”

Then add a sentence to clarify the language used in Title 15 related to marriage by inserting something to the effect of:

“Gender-specific terms relating to the marital relationship or familial relationships, including without limitation “spouse,” “family,” “marriage,” “dependent,” “bride,” “groom,” “husband,” “wife,” shall be construed to be gender-neutral for all purposes throughout the law, whether in the context of statute, administrative or court rule, policy, common law, or any other source of civil law.”

Bingo. With that we're done. Check your watch because it's not even lunchtime yet.

With one sentence & one syllable out of the way, our General Assembly still has the entire afternoon, and the rest of the week, to work on grown-up Democratic solutions to the Vermont-specific problems arising from this latest GOP recession.

The job for our Democratic leaders in the House & Senate is certainly to pass a marriage rights bill to protect the rights of same gender couples equally. Just as critically, however, their job is to prevent

 — the Proposition H8 brigade

 — the Bigots

 — the Up.From.Under.the.Rocks.&.Taking.the.Lord's.Name.In.Vain.Lunatics

 — the Concern Troll Republicans and assorted conservative fear slaves

from turning passage of the marriage equality bill into a circus of wingnuttery, and a festival of hate and fear. Passing a marriage equality bill at this historical juncture is only the “showing up for work” part. The politically effective and reasonable part of this package is to pass it swiftly and efficiently and, yes, muscle it down the opposition's throat if that's what is necessary. Do not let this become a long and drawn out process because the opposition wants it to be long and drawn out.

The fact is we have complicated important work to do. That is in fact our argument, not the Governor's. “There is important work ahead of us and a serious economic crises, there is no time to waste as we pass a same gender marital rights law. Let's pass it without delay and move on.” On the question or marriage rights, we have the solution to the problem of inequality right in front of us.  We already know and respect the obligation to see justice occur.  There is no need for those of us on the right side of history to complicate things further by delaying Vermont's progress. Just do it.

One Sentence

One Syllable

One Second

Vermont is barely a nano-click or two ahead of civil society on the marriage equality front, assuming the General Assembly passes equality legislation in 2009. In the not too distant future, Vermont's role helping to secure civil society's minimum rights, responsibilities and protections for our gay and lesbian brothers and sisters will be a dusty footnote. It is well past time that we un-hitch heterosexuals from their lonely burden of upholding the institution of marriage. Arbitrary monopolies and State enforced exclusions do not strengthen any institutions and marriage has proven to be no exception.  Lesbian, gay and heterosexual Vermonters need each other's support, and we will all benefit from socially reinforced, culturally enabled and legally empowered marriages and families that the law protects and that the State extends to all Vermonters. 

THE FIRST VERMONT PRESIDENTIAL STRAW POLL (for links to the candidates exploratory committees, refer to the diary on the right-hand column)!!! If the 2008 Vermont Democratic Presidential Primary were

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

7:59 p.m. GMD Calls it for OBAMA

Please note the tag “President Obama” attached to this post.

With  polls closing in 60 seconds in  —

Connecticut (7), Delaware (3), Washington DC, (3), Illinois (21), Maine (4), Maryland (10), Massachusetts (12), Michigan (18) New Hampshire (4), New Jersey (15), Pennsylvania (21), Missouri (11) Mississippi (6), South Dakota (3), Alabama (9), Tennessee (11), Texas (34), Oklahoma (7)

—  and based on GMD's extensive network of national on-the-ground poll data, ** cough, cough ** we (OK I am) pleased to announce that Barack Obama is President-elect of the United States of America.

 

Hitched a Ride w/ACORN & I Moved to Texas

Go figure.

Today I received my second Robo-Call from the spouse of arch-conservative, chickenhawk, Bush corruption enabling WhackJob John Cornyn of Texas.  Mrs. Cornyn is dutifully helping her Big John in his reelection bid.

Either Acorn transferred me to Texas when I wasn't looking or this is one extremely and ambitiously wasteful GOTV effort, even by Texas standards. This is now (at least) the second time I am aware that Sandy Dearest Cornyn has called to remind me to vote in “my” district in Texas (.WMA file).

I hope this means there is a Republican in Texas (who thinks he has an Vermont 802 area code) and who is also in the process of forgetting to vote.  More hopefully, this is probably a healthy anecdote of the state of Republican GOTV when it comes to finding willing campaign workers.  Seems there is a chronic lack of volunteers with dialing fingers and enthusiasm for a notoriously shitty stable of GOP candidates, such as the delusionally unhinged War-Pig from Texas whose wife keeps calling me at home. 

Robocalls are ubiquitous.  However, if you listen to the text of this one, you will hear that this call is targetted to the identified faithful. A lack of people willing to volunteer for GOP campaigns like Cornyn's and make the personal calls to party generated “Identified Republican Voter Lists” (shit, I am still shaking my head over this one) leads to these types mistakes.

Seriously folks, how hard is it to explain to the phone bank programmer that “802” is NOT in Texas? Does a crudely cynical conservative Christofacistzombie running in another time zone really need a memo to know that yours truly is not registered as, sympathetic to, voting with or amendably disposed toward, Republicans at any level?

WASSSSUP . . . Eight years later

In the waning days of peace and prosperity brought to us by the last Democratic administration, a really crappy Belgium Beer infected pop-culture with a viral commercial, which became the functional equivalent of a mass media “I'm with Stupid” t-shirt (clarification, NOW it's a Belgium Beer & it still tasks like yeasty seltzer).  Of course it's fitting that Democratic administrations lose deficits while, under Republican administrations, we lose multi-national employers.

For those of you who enjoy the “WHERE ARE THEY NOW” entertainment genre, this follow-up succinctly demonstrates what happens when voters entrust peace, prosperity, national security, fiscal responsibility, global economic leadership and competitiveness and the governance of the U.S. to the Republican party.  

Truly, we have come to point in U.S. history where there is no legitimate, objective debate that incompetency and fidelity to failed policies is the baseline “credential” to be a Republican leader. (and don't forget that corruption and deceit receive extra-credit for climbing the GOP leadership ladder). Fiscal irresponsibility, lost wars of ideological choice, regressive taxation, crony capitalism, rule-of-law and equal protection are jettisoned and fear is the structural foundation of every national policy and political campaign waged by GOP leaders. From the incompetency of the Reagan years to the lawlessness of the Bush years, this is the legacy of Republican rule.

Flip over for more memory lane, . . . 

With less than two weeks to go to this year's election, do you remember when Governor Dean took health care and economic development seriously?

With less than two weeks to go, do you remember when President Clinton dedicated his administration to peace and prosperity while the Republican congress dedicated itself to tearing the country apart and engaging in class warfare and competitive corruption?

With less than two weeks to go before the election, do you remember how Vermont's last Democratic Governor made it his job to call or visit at least 10 of Vermont's significant employers EVERY WEEK of every year he served us as Governor to ask these employers what the State could do help them grow their Vermont businesses?

With less than two weeks to go before this year's election, does it matter that Jim Douglas' Republican administration has overseen the loss thousands of good paying jobs, the cultivation of low paying benefit-less jobs, the institution of continual under-employment and wage stagflation and the abandonment of Vermont's economic development initiatives?

We have less than two weeks, WASSSSSUP

Wall Street Bailout: Trickle Down or Trickle Up?

 

If it's good enough for Baghdad Avenue, Iraq, will Congress consider it for Main Street, U.S.A., too?

ECONOMIC SURGE

Listening to Secretary Paulson and his merry band of socialist millionaire safety-netters, I keep thinking back to the Bush Administration's $Multi-$Billion Ca$h drop on Iraq.

Sitting on the precedent of using a surge of trickle up cash to revitalize a bombed out economy, Congress must consider recklessly dumping cash on Main Street rather than irresponsibly giving it to Wall Street.

How, why and what for after the flip . . .

 

With an economy freezing, recessing, depressing, deflating, nose-diving & tanking due to conservative Republican economic incompetence, Mister Bush and his administration are seeking approximately $700 Billion to throw at Wall Street bankers to “fix” the economy.

The first, of many, questions Congress must consider is whether an extremely small set of Wall Street Bankers are the most effective recipients of the equivalent of $5,400 per individual or joint U.S. taxpayer? (plus interest!).
 
Let's just say, if it is good Baghdad Avenue, maybe Congress should be willing to do it for Main Street too?

Mister Bush sent cargo jets of cash to jump start the distressed Iraqi economy.  Remember?

We then learned that another dozen or so $Billion were spread like Onan's seed, dispersed throughout Iraq without oversight, accountability or purpose. One more time, folks; THERE WERE F'ING JETS, MILITARY CARGO PLANES, FULLY LOADED WITH PALLETS OF CASH DROPPED ON IRAQ.

We can hardly say, at this point, that dumping cash on Main Street is a novel idea.

ECONOMIC SURGE

After seven years of Republican middle class to millionaire class wealth transfer, I propose a “Strike-All” bill. The amendment, posted below, to Mister Bush's proposed $700 billion giveaway. The alternative proposal sends the money instead to people who, at long last, deserve to receive some of what they've already paid.  It at least sends to working people the borrowed money Congress and Mister Bush intend to borrow from them and then squander. It's only fair, yes?

THE AMOUNT

Recall the U.S., in its exuberance to embrace the U.S. war on Iraq, sent pallets of cash to jump-start the Iraqi economy (even though it was clear that our war on Iraq was a disastrous mistake).

So what, it was only money, right?

So why $700Billion to Main Street, U.S.A.?  Why the same amount as the proposed Wall Street bailout?

Well, here's the great (sick?) part and really, who can argue with this (I mean seriously, who CAN argue with the logic of this?).

Consider the relevant demographic facts between Iraq and the U.S. in light of the alleged crises. This is all, purportedly, caused by mortgage defaults and the risk of Americans loosing their houses. It's about households:

IRAQ-U.S. COMPARISONS:  

Households: U.S. Approximately 105 Million — Iraq Approximately 4 Million.

AMOUNT of MONEY DROPPED PER HOUSEHOLD on IRAQ:** $27,000,000,000.00, ** which works out to approximately $6,750.00 per Iraqi household.   

By comparison, $6,750.00 dropped on every U.S. household ($6,750.00 x 105 million households) will cost $708.75 billion, which we'll just call $709 Billion.

$709 Billion? Hmmmm? I've heard a number just like that recently, yes?

I think you see where I'm going with this.

So, if Congress decides to drop the same amount of money, per household, on Main Street, U.S.A. that Mister Bush did on Main Street, Iraq, it would cost the exact same $700 billion they are now talking about dropping on Wall Street, New York.

I wish I were making this up.

Soooooooooo . . . . in the meantime . . . . . What's good enough for Iraq, as they say, is good enough for Main Street. After all, Mister Bush did not spend all that $27Billion in one Baghdad market, he spread it all over a country that he had just bombed into pieces. So why spend $700 billion on just one street, Wall Street, in the U.S. when he has economically bombed our entire country into a recession with conservative economic policies?

Seems the Fed & the Treasury already have the money presses rolling. Now all they need are the cargo planes.

—————————————

Addendum:

The original GOP proposal was a complete giveaway with no oversight, no accountablity, it changed banking/accounting regulations to make the system less stable and less transparent and basically added to the problem while ripping off the taxpayers. Our feckless Democratic leaders in Congress Paulson's original proposal, which was not hard to do, went to the drafting board and (sigh) came back with multiple drafts and “compromises” that do basically the same harm in a slightly different form.

 

No matter how much better a terrible bill Congress ultimately passes, if Congress must give $700 billion away for no meaningfully fair, just and effective purpose, then here is an equally and possibly more reasonable alternative for them to consider. It is far fairer and more likely to help the economy — not that it matters to the people in D.C. who are doing this to us — but for what it's worth. 

 

The Main Street $700 billion pallets of money Strike-All Amendment

 

STRIKE-ALL Amendment proposed by the “congressional.give.a.crap.coalition” to be inserted in lieu of S___ and H.R.____ relating to The Treasury Authority to Swallow Mortgage Backed Securities Act. 

 

It is hereby proposed that all language contained in of S.___ and all H.R.___, after the bill introduction, be stricken in its entirety.  In place of the language now under consideration, the following langue shall be inserted —

 

Sec. 1. TITLE:

 

LEGISLATIVE PROPOSAL FOR TRICKLE-UP AUTHORITY AND FOR THE SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY TO BOMB MAIN STREET AMERICA WITH CASH AND TO SECURE MIDDLE AMERICA'S DEFAULTING MORTGAGES ON WHICH WALL STREET DECEPTIVELY BET ITS OWN HOUSE (of cards)

 

Sec. 2.  FINDINGS:

 

WHEREAS: The economy is not “fundamentally sound” as has been repeatedly represented by Mister Bush and Mister McCain. We are in a recession. Hello! America can thank the Republican party and its regressive taxes, its billionaire give-a-ways, its deficits and its inability to run government, or an economy, or a war, or domestic policy, or foreign policy, or to plan for the future, or to understand history or to govern without resorting to extreme corruption and criminality for our current economic crises; and

 

WHEREAS: Whereas Mister Bush and his deficit-inflating, class-warrioring, fiscal demolition-derby Republican economic policy genius advisors did deliver C-5 cargo jets stuffed with pallets of money into Iraqi warzones; and

 

WHEREAS:  The pallets of money Mister Bush, the Federal Reserve and the Air Force delivered to the streets of Iraq just happened to go into neighborhoods experiencing a distressed and bombed out housing market; and  

 

WHEREAS: Republican-Americans in Congress voted in lock-step with Mister Bush for seven years to loot the treasury, rape the middle class, engage in vicious class warfare and sell our children's future to a lifetime of economic decline; and

 

WHEREAS: It is the intent of Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson, the Bush administration and the criminals who have supported seven years of robbing working Americans blind to pull Just.One.Last.BIG-Time.Heist.Before.January.20th before they sneak out of D.C; and

 

WHEREAS: Tens of thousands of criminally rich Wall Street bankers have, in just 7 short years, paid themselves far in excess of $700 Billion in the form of

 

extreme bonuses and exorbinate and frequently unearned executive pay, and

extreme compensation for fraudulent activity against stockholders; and

extreme compensation for fraudulent conduct against consumers; and

extreme compensation for fraudulent conduct against the IRS; and

extreme compensation for violating fiduciary duties to their own banking institutions; and

 

these same bankers retain billions of dollars of wealth and shall remain wealthy beyond Main Street's imagination regardless of whether they receive a $Trillion advance to cover their bad bets to be paid from our children's future toil and regressive payroll taxes; and

 

WHEREAS: Trickle Down economic theory has a proven track record of failure.  It is a guaranteed approach for transferring wealth generated by the hard work, sacrifice and toil of working Americans straight to the gated communities of monopolized wealth.  Republican “Trickle Down” economics is class warfare intended to transfer resources from working Americans to an insulated handful of billionaires, multi-millionaires and to government favored & subsidized corporations, all of whom are legally shielded from the burden of supporting the United State's fiscal and infrastructure commitments; and

 

WHEREAS: Every DNA fiber of the Wall Street bailout is another example of Republican and Bush Administration regressive fiscal class violence and Democratic capitulation —

 

BE IT NOW THEREFORE ENACTED by Congress to address the current economic crises caused by Wall Street gambling, Republican deregulation and corruption and unmasked predatory behavior against the dignity of working Americans that:

 

Section 3. Short Title.

This Act may be cited as “We Did it to Iraq So Let's Do It to Main Street Money Bomb Act of 2008.”

 

Sec. 4. Appropriations:

(a) Authority to $pend$.–The Secretary is authorized to summon the Air Force and load cargo jets to the gills with pallets of money.  The Secretary shall make sound and reasonable payments up to $6,750.00 to middle America with NO terms and conditions determined by the Secretary.

 

(b) Necessary Actions.–The Secretary is authorized to take the following actions, as the Secretary deems necessary, to carry out the expeditious delivery of unaccounted for cash, up to $700 billion, to Main St., U.S.A.:

 

(1) ordering pallets;

(2) commandeering jets;

(3) stacking the pallets full of money;

(4) Attaching parachutes to pallets of money;

(5) Commandeering pizza delivery cars/trucks and their drivers to quickly and accurately make sure Middle America receives the case as soon as they ask for it;

(6) paying money to “Any American” including taxpayers, homeowners, working Americans and anyone generating economic activity in the United States as designated by this Act; and

(7) issuing regulations and guidance as necessary or appropriate to carry out the delivery of cash to Main Street, U.S.A. as authorized under the authority of this Act.

 

Sec. 4. Designated Recipients of Pallets of Cash.

 

In exercising the authorities granted in this Act, the Secretary shall pay money, up to $6750.00 to Any American.  For purposes of this Act, “Any American” shall   person with an adjusted gross income of $75,000.00 or less who lives in a household anywhere in the United States, other than on Wall Street, who is threatened by conservative economic policies and who —

 

(1) Works, has worked, will work, has a home, wants a home or has lost a home to the vagaries of the Republican economy; and

(2) Faces or fears the possibility of foreclosure; and

(3) For purposes of this Act “any American” shall also include a family with an adjusted gross income of $125,000.00 per annum or less or a married/civil-unioned couple (even if their state refuses to recognize their marriage) and who together have an adjusted gross income of $100,000.00 or less; and

(4) For purposes of this Act, “any American” also means any sick, disabled, veteran or family facing foreclosure due to Republican economic, social, tax, war or health care policy, and who has already received the maximum benefit, may petition for another benefit.

 

Sec. 5. Review.

Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are reviewable by a coupla' hard, pipe-hittin' **economists** who'll go to work on the trickle-down Republicans with a pair of pliers and a blow torch and get medieval on his ass” if the Secretary doesn't show Main Street the money the way the Bush administration has shown the money to American's monopolized wealth class.

 

Sec. 6. Definitions.

For purposes of this section, the following definitions shall apply:

 

(1) Secretary.–The term “Secretary” means the Secretary of the Treasury.

(2) United States.–The term “United States” means the everywhere in the U.S. except Wall Street.

 

 

———–
** $27 Billion – This figure is a rounded number taken from a 2008 adjusted value of the money airlifted into the war zone and the dozen or so $Billions that just disappeared after being trucked into the desert and poured into all sorts of alleged projects and random money dumps throughout Iraq.

 

[NOTE: This post was revised from the earlier version]

THE FIRST VERMONT PRESIDENTIAL STRAW POLL (for links to the candidates exploratory committees, refer to the diary on the right-hand column)!!! If the 2008 Vermont Democratic Presidential Primary were

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

How I Left the GOP

I have a confession. It's about my unquestioned loyalty to the Republican Party.

Starting with Ronald Reagan's speech to the Goldwater Republican convention in '64, I picked up some bad habits — some worse than others — and lived a life as a loyal Republican-American for the next 40 years.

Two generations of GOP class warfare did not affect my blind loyalty. 

Multiple recessions caused by GOP administrations (including two really big ones by an equal number of really bad generations of Bushes) did not send me packing.

Watching fiscally treasonous conservatives export the promise of a fading American dream far away and deep into the vast carbon footprint of totalitarian China, did not wake me out of the depths of Republican-American self loathing.

In my state-of-mind, Republican war crimes, GOP felonies, Neocon conspiracies and constitutuional asswiping were just matter-of-fact-he-said-she-said footnotes of day-to-day political equivication.

Reality did come crashing down. It can crash on anyone, eventually.  What REALLY drove me from the GOP, however, was a personal, organic revelation and not anything I saw on the evening news.

I'll explain. . .

It was awful.

The hallucinations at the end were frightening.

There were horrifying sights & sounds.

I could swear there were smells (was I being gassed in my own room?), but no one else seemed to notice or care.  My skin felt like it was constantly being crawled over/under by insects, worms, or worse, sentient intruders.

I had convulsive seizures. No matter where I looked, it looked like a window shade had suddenly sprung open and bright light was blinding me.

From the years of Goldwater/Reagan conservatives until the Bush neocons, I  and all those years years of mainlining battery acid and slathering the insides of my nostrils with airplane glue, the shock of court-ordered institutional detox was one of the worst experiences of my life.

But I gotta' tell you, once I kicked the drugs and left the hospital, I never voted Republican again!

She Has a Fertile Mouth Too

So Sambo beat the bitch!

This is how Republican Vice Presidential nominee Sarah Palin described Barack Obama’s win over Hillary Clinton to political colleagues in a restaurant a few days after Obama locked up the Democratic Party presidential nomination.

The only thing that surprises me about this is nothing.

And the bigger issue — 

Were I a profiler working for the FBI, or a sociologist looking to identify a particular mindset, and someone asked me to locate a suspect who fit the following description:

White, Insular, Republican, Christian, Conservative, Xenophobic, Superficial, Secretive, Militaristic, Anti-Social, Cheneyite.Twinkle.In.John.McCain's.Fading.Eyesight & Right-Wing Representative of the GOP “Face of **cough** Change” —

 — then, basically, I'd tell them to belly up to the lunch counter, open their ears and be on the look-out for a glossy and shallow GOP elected official from the Newt Gingrich school of buzzwords and dissembling who might be:

eating lunch with five or six people when the subject of the Democrat’s primary battle came up. The governor, seemingly not caring that people at nearby tables would likely hear her, uttered the slur and then laughed loudly as her meal mates joined in appreciatively.

Bingo!

I really do not expect any better from Governor Palin, and I am expecting much worse between now, and Post-November 2008, when the wingnut welfare checks start pouring into her trusty “job.well.done.Republican.hit.(wo)man.fringe.fascist” post-election payoff bank account.” I do not expect any better from a incompetent small town mayor sailing on creationism and corruption, and certainly neither does John McCain. Neither did the Republican delegates in Minneapolis. That's the point.

This is the face of conservative Republicanism. Behind that face, millions of unevolved descendents from Jim Crow, George Wallace and Ronald Reagan, what the press euphamistically refers to as “the base,” are riding McCain's neanderthal express, vying for the first seat on the bus to nowhere screaming “that's the ticket!”