No New Vista utopian city/state development for Vermont

The Valley News reports  some good news for the upper valley towns that Utah resident David R. Hall had targeted to build his Mormon inspired utopian city/state in. The mega-wealthy Hall is giving up his quest and will begin selling off almost two thousand acres he had scooped up in Sharon, Tunbridge, Strafford, and Royalton. If it had been completed, the city/state he envisioned would have encompassed 5,000acres and housed up to 20,000 people. Hall’s home-town Utah newspaper the Deseret News had correctly said the plan was received in Vermont “like a dead cow falling from the sky”

DCFFTSDavid Hall decided to sell the land after the National Trust for Historic Preservation placed the towns of Royalton, Sharon, Strafford and Tunbridge on its “watch status,” a special designation that accompanies its annual list of the “11 Most Endangered Historic Places,” he said this morning.

“The recent designation of the area as a watch by national historic was a genius move by those who oppose my purchases,” Hall said via email. “I admit that I am worn down by the drama and have decided to give in and get out of Vermont.”

Hall’s plan was first made public by Nicole Antal, a local librarian, who blogged about it on DailyUV.com when she noticed parcels of land in her town were being bought by a Utah resident. Local opposition efforts quickly followed to stop the “NewVista” project.

From the beginning Hall was remarkably off-putting with local residents. He eventually hired Montpelier public relations lobbyist Kevin Ellis. But though you can spin all you want, you can never make a second first impression.

There’s probably nothing like a single mega-wealthy person (or business) gathering up multiple parcels of land to cause a general sense of unease with small town residents. In the 2016 elections state politicians scrambled a bit to address the issue on record. And since no one in Vermont had ever dealt with a project on the scale or manner that Hall was proposing,  there was a question brewing about how well the state’s Act 250 development regulation law would apply to such a project. Eventually the Vermont House passed a non-binding resolution calling for closer scrutiny of Hall’s city/state project.

While most residents  in the four upper valley towns may breathe a sigh of relief (excluding a real estate agent or two perhaps), it’s worth wondering what might have happened if Hall had more personal P.R. skills or had been savvy enough to hire a connected Montpelier lobbyist like Ellis from the start. Happily though, Hall’s New Vista (rechristened  Windsorange LLC as of Aug. 2017 in a rebranding effort) seems to be about to come to a soft landing — and perhaps it’ll land in some other state.

One thought on “No New Vista utopian city/state development for Vermont

Comments are closed.