I’ve spent my entire legal career as a Legal Aid lawyer. After I graduated from law school in 1979 I worked at Legal Aid of Western Michigan for four years, and I’ve been working at Vermont Legal Aid since 1983. I’ve loved not necessarily every day of it, but definitely every year, and it’s mainly because the work and the Legal Aid movement makes it possible to bring about positive change both for individual clients and for large segments of the population touched by poverty, neglect, and injustice.
Working in Legal Services for so long I know that we don’t make our achievements alone, and I’m proud not only of what I can accomplish but when my colleagues are able to accomplish great things.
This is one of those stories. At Vermont Legal Aid we have a project that provides legal representation to Medicare beneficiaries, and recently we had an individual case in which a client had been denied reimbursement for rehab services because they weren’t helping her get better. No surprise because lots of people have chronic conditions that will never get better, but rehab services will help them live independent lives in their own homes, giving them the maximum level of self-direction possible, and saving society a lot of money that would otherwise be spent on nursing home care into the bargain. By good lawyering my colleagues were able to keep the independent living services coming and one Medicare beneficiary was able to preserve her independent living situation.
But it didn’t stop there. You may have read about this in The Times. Vermont Legal Aid cooperated with the Center for Medicare Advocacy and filed a class action seeking to change the policy not just for our individual client, but for Medicare beneficiaries across the country who were in danger of losing the home-based that were enabling them to live outside of nursing homes. Last week it was announced that the government had agreed to settle the case, and to continue providing these vital services.
As The Times reports:
The case also attracted an editorial from The Times, which said of the settlement, “It is clearly the humane thing to do for desperately sick people with little hope of recovery.” and “The solution to Medicare’s cost problem is not to deny needed services but to make the delivery of care more efficient and less expensive, and to ensure better management of care for the chronically ill.”
I didn’t work on the case, but I’m proud to be part of an organization that was able to see the need for this change and was willing to support the excellent work needed to carry it through to success.
As I said, the work is hard, the days can be challenging, but the rewards are great.
and to Medicare patients across the country.
Americans tend to make big assumptions that people get the care they need, will always have the care they need…because, as we are so often told by Republican healthcare deniers, “Americans have the best healthcare in the world.”
Unfortunately, as you point out, Jack, it’s an uphill battle all the way for a shockingly large segment of our population.
Without the effort of folks like you (the good-guy lawyers) there would be even more real suffering out there.
This is a great victory for both VT and the nation. We hear constantly about the high costs of medicare and medicaid. One of the biggest drivers of that cost is the exorbitant cost of nursing home care. Anything we can do to enable people to “age in place,” by providing the appropriate amounts of skilled care outside of a nursing home will save us all in the long run.
Kudos to those who worked so hard for this victory.