In the most recent entry in their blizzard of “issue” ads Bruce Lisman’s Campaign for Vermont may have crossed a legal line past issue advocacy. The Vermont Press Bureau reports that the Vermont Democratic Party thinks so and filed a complaint with the Attorney General claiming the following about the newest ad’s content:
“such critical and inaccurate hyperbole about the Governor can only be viewed as furthering the purpose of opposing his candidacy and/or influencing the outcome of the governor’s election.”
The ad reportedly targets Governor Shumlin by name over the state budget that Lisman claims may increase property taxes.
If the VDP complaint is supported it would mean millionaire Lisman’s Campaign for Vermont has violated their 501(C) (4) status. A registered 501(C) (4) can accept unlimited donations and does not have to disclose donor’s names but is constrained to issue advocacy.
If organizations want to advocate expressly for the victory or defeat of a specific candidate, they have to register as political action committees, abide by $2,000 donation limits and disclose the names of their donors.
Transparency is one key to a functioning democracy was title of the Campaign for Vermont’s initial public offering distributed throughout the state. Says Lisman:
“…the lack of government transparency ignited me into action”
Maybe donor transparency is one key to a functioning advocacy. So, come on Bruce, be a transparent Campaign for Vermont.This change might put you in bind but it would get your preaching and practicing into functional alignment.
Well, considering that Lisman’s “Campaign for Vermont,” like Darcie Johnston’s group, is probably financed by the Koch brothers and company, I am glad that the VDP is doing this.
was so predictable
if it’s determined that the CFV is in fact a political vehicle, will they have to provide info. about all contributions or just those from this point forward?
Truly. Nobody could have anticipated…