Update: Limbaugh defends Gingrich’s honor

This isn’t the most important or substantive issue, but I can’t let this go without one more post.

We saw the news this week about Newt Gingrich and his, shall we say, casual attitude toward marital fidelity, for which he got some negative publicity. Granted, it’s not about politics, it’s about sex, although the fact that he was busy impeaching Bill Clinton for extramarital sex while he was enjoying his how access to extramarital sex (to the extent you can say you’re enjoying it when you’re having sex with someone who is so sharp she can cut glass) says something not very favorable about his adherence to principle and intellectual honesty.

Nevertheless, the man who has been the leader of the right wing of the Republican Party ever since the election of Bill Clinton has rushed to defend Gingrich’s honor.

From Rush Limbaugh’s web page, to which I will not link:

I got a great note from a friend of mine.  “So Newt wanted an open marriage.  BFD.  At least he asked his wife for permission instead of cheating on her.  That’s a mark of character, in my book.  Newt’s a victim.  We all are.  Ours is the horniest generation.  We were soldiers in the sex revolution.  We were tempted by everything from Bob and Carol and Ted and Alice to Plato’s Retreat, Deep Throat to no-fault divorce.  Many of us paid the ultimate price, AIDS, abortion, or alimony for the cultural marching orders we got.  Hell, for all I know we should be getting disability from the government.” That’s from a good friend of mine, “Newt’s slogan ought to, ‘Hell, yes, I wanted it.'”  (laughing)  I’m sharing with you how some people are reacting to this.

“Mark of character”?

I guess that’s true. I guess that for the last thirty or forty years Gingrich has been demonstrating his character. In fact, we probably know more about the character of Newt Gingrich than we have known about any presidential candidate since Richard Nixon.

And they are remarkably similar.

2 thoughts on “Update: Limbaugh defends Gingrich’s honor

  1. Ya know, I wonder how Newt & Rush & Santorum and the rest would interpret Dostoevsky’s line from Crime And Punishment–“If there is no God, then everything is permitted.”  Goddless, amoral heathens running for President.  What next?  A Serial Killer in the White House?  Oh…already had that.  Their boy W.

  2. Gingrich wasn’t asking permission, unless you mean ex post facto, since he’d already been having an affair for 6 years.

    But apparently this is the new meme, since Fox had a psychologist on saying much the same thing: thrice married makes him a better president.  Are some voices bailing on Willard in favor of Newt?

Comments are closed.