The Penny Drops

Even though news of the Fukushima nuclear disaster languishes in the minor columns of major newspapers these days, the drama continues to unfold toward an ever darkening and uncertain conclusion.

It came as no surprise yesterday, when Tokyo Electric Power Co. finally conceded that fission most likely continues to occur at at least one of the damaged Fukushima reactors. As our readers will recall, Arnie Gundersen of Fairewinds Associates predicted as much, months ago.  

If active monitoring suggests it is occurring in Reactor 2, there is increasing probability that it may also be occurring at one or more of the other damaged reactors at the site, where detailed measurements have yet to be undertaken.

The picture now painted by TEPCO is of a far graver situation than has been officially conceded up to now.

Junichi Matsumoto, a Tokyo Electric spokesman, acknowledged episodes of fission, telling a news conference: “There is a possibility that certain conditions came together temporarily that were conducive to re-criticality,” and that the measurements indicated a burst that occurred at a slightly higher rate than prior cases. “It’s not that we’ve had zero fission until now,” Mr. Matsumoto said. “But at this point, we do not think there is a large-scale and self-sustained re-criticality.”

The suspicion is that fissionable material has melted through the bottom of both the reactor and the containment, and is now essentially free in the environment, recombining in such a way as to intermittently initiate critical reactions without the possibility of human or mechanical intervention to stop them.

Under these circumstances, more and more radioactive byproducts will continue to be released freely into the soil and even the groundwater.   Though Arnie hypothesized that this might be happening, it was officially never even entertained as a possibility until now.

While this development  is frightening enough, what has to be even more disturbing is the fact that every semblance of official certainty has been dropped and it is now generally being acknowledged that there is no way of knowing exactly what is happening, how serious the situation will become; and when and how it will all end.

Hiroaki Koide, assistant professor at Kyoto University’s Research Reactor Institute, was quoted by the New York Times as saying:

If episodes of fission at Fukushima were confirmed… “our entire understanding of nuclear safety would be turned on its head.”

Meanwhile…back to the human side of the story, there is new evidence that “hot particles” from the Fukushima accident(s) have been far more widely dispersed than originally admitted.  

A new Fairewinds video discusses data from  a study by Scientist Marco Kaltofan that looked at the distribution of those particles  in various regions of  Japan; and even as far away as Seattle and Boston.  In Japan, that distribution of hot particles followed unanticipated patterns, spreading contamination far and wide.  

The clean-up protocols in use throughout Japan are spotty, and less than effective.  Furthermore,  Mr. Kaltofan’s paper demonstrates conclusively how inadequate the current evacuation zones are that currently govern emergency response, both here and in Japan.

Scientist Marco Kaltofen Presents Data Confirming Hot Particles from Fairewinds Associates on Vimeo.

About Sue Prent

Artist/Writer/Activist living in St. Albans, Vermont with my husband since 1983. I was born in Chicago; moved to Montreal in 1969; lived there and in Berlin, W. Germany until we finally settled in St. Albans.

6 thoughts on “The Penny Drops

  1. Wow.  That’s real comforting.  They are admitting they know little about what’s occurring underground.

    “There is the possibility…”  Either criticality occurred, or it didn’t.  None of this “possibility.”

    We are going to wake one morning to learn that the whole site exploded overnight.

  2. Aw come on don’t be soo alarmist! They are doing great -no problem at reactors 5 and 6 they are drinking the decontaminated water from the floor.

    Yasuhiro Sonoda, Japan’s parliamentary secretary for the Cabinet Office, on Monday drank decontaminated water taken from puddles inside the buildings housing reactors 5 and 6 at the Fukushima plant.

    Standard science based procedure,no problems,no worries!

    http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/

  3. The information that Japanese doctors are being defunded if they tell mothers that their childrens cancers are linked to radiation is horrifying.
    This is a crime against humanity, and should be prosecuted at The Hague.
    Thank you Fairewinds for investigating.
    Fukushima needs a bioremediation and decommissioning strategy that uses the power of nature to soak up, seal, reduce the danger of the whole area.
    Can you please look at the ‘biofouling’ potential of zebra mussels, oysters and related species in Japan.
    Uptake by live shellfish
    http://www.ehu.eus/europeanclass2003/biological_aspects_of_metal_accu.htm

    As all the estuary and sea shellfish have died within a huge radius of Fukushima or been concreted over if they survived in the harbour, it would be necessary to use a closed environment, and preferably just used CRUSHED shells, to render the radioactive particles inert, and capable of being stored, as CRUSHED SHELL safely in a geologically stable location, where further bioremediation by bacteria can be tested on them.

    Zebra mussels survived in the cooling ponds at Chernobyl, and the nearby rivers, and thrive in the canals of Europe under heavy loads of metals all the time.
    Blue mussels have cleaned up the Baltic, they are 90% of the Baltic Sea biomass, and have chowed down on all the pollution and radiation thrown at them.
    So there is plenty of studies over the last 50 years looking at how this happens in nature.
    You just need to get Tepco to work with nature, instead of against it.

    Can you please look at water filters for homes in Japan that include zeolite, crushed and popped oyster shells that trap soluble radioactive particles by cation exchange.
    Can you please look at the ocean to mountain rainwater hydrology cycle to put people out of harms way of the concentration of hot particles in estuaries and lakes.
    The whole watershed has to be considered in where people move to, or away from.

    All too depressing, there has to be some way to work on this without putting people’s lives at further risk.

    Thank you for being so brave to go to the hot zone and investigate.

Comments are closed.