Per the AP via the Brattleboro Reformer:
Last month, Entergy went to court asking for a preliminary order allowing it to stay open while the underlying lawsuit works its way through the courts – possibly all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. On Monday, Judge J. Garvan Murtha denied that request.
It’s almost as though there are laws about this or something.
Update: Shumlin Response:
“In my judgment, Vermont has acted and will continue to act responsibly regarding our energy future, and we will continue to work hard to ensure that our laws are enforced and respected. Entergy’s lawsuit is an attack on state authority, attempting to deny us a voice regarding whether Vermont Yankee will run past March 2012 — even though Entergy has known since 2002 that it could not operate the plant past that date without state approval. I believe strongly in the state’s authority, and I believe that Entergy has not been an honest, fair and responsible player for Vermont.”
Judge denies Entergy injunction request; trial set to begin on Sept. 12
by VTD Editor | July 18, 2011
By Randolph T. Holhut The Commons
.
http://vtdigger.org/2011/07/18…
Judge denies bid to keep Yankee open
Burlington, Vermont – July 18, 2011
http://www.wcax.com/story/1510…
http://www.burlingtonfreepress…
Entergy had said if they didn’t get an injunction, they’d have to shut down now. Okay, let’s see you do it! Or was that just another lie?
The possibility of running per NRC w/o refueling exists. At $1 million per day, they are not shutting down any time soon so even the suggestion was a laugh & more of their typical bluff & bluster.
See?
http://blogs.burlingtonfreepre…