It. Gets. Worse.

(One thing among many that Julie was always good at was administering a good, sharp poke to those who need it the most. This was one of my favorite pieces she ever wrote. As always, Julie tells it like it is.   – promoted by kestrel9000)

Hi homophobes.  

We need to talk.

You’ve been kind of busy lately, and you’ve had a few victories.

But I’m here to tell you something:  

It. Gets. Worse.

I’m in my 40’s.  

When I was growing up, there was one obviously gay kid in my high school.  Almost everyone mocked and teased him.  I came out in college, and I received personal threats on a routine basis; nasty phone calls in the middle of the night, hostile and vicious notes left on my door.  

You know the drill.  Some of you probably even made those calls, with your buddies, up late drinking, thinking “hey, that will be fun!”

Friends of mine have had it worse.  Some of have actually been gay bashed or threatened with violence.

And then there was Matthew Shepard.  

And I think that may have been where things started to change; this image, frozen in time, of a kid beaten so brutally, so badly, but still taking almost a week to die.  And the picture of him, just suspended there, so public and open in the brutality that people recoiled at it.

And things have been changing, faster than you’d ever imagined.  Just over a decade ago, we had a bitter, brutal, fight in Vermont over civil unions, the 2nd class citizen version of marriage equality.  We won that fight, and it cost some good members of the house and senate their seats.

And then, in Massachusetts, over the course of days, civil unions became something else– they shifted from this horrible, terrible, idea, and transformed into the conservative alternative to marriage.  It started with “protect marriage at all costs” and shortly veered into “…but of course everyone deserves equal rights…”

And you lost, then.  And you tried to enact a constitutional amendment (in a state where frankly it’s not that hard to do) and you lost then, too.

I know the numbers for us are small, but that’s how things like this work.  We’ve won in other states since then.   Vermont now has full marriage rights.  You tried to run primaries against one of the Republicans who supported them, in an extremely conservative district.  

You failed.   Again.

New Hampshire is teetering, but even with an extremely conservative legislature, you’re not making headway with same sex marriage.  You know why?

Because they’re a lot more scared of us than they are of you.  

They feel this way with good reason.  You go from state to state, finding small crowds of bigots to come complain about us and testify in your own vicious and bitter fashion.  We talk about hope, and family and the future, and we do it without bitterness, with clarity, with love.

And all you really have is “this will destroy marriage.”

But it won’t.  And I think you know this: the desperation in your voice, the laughable testimony in California during the trials over proposition 8 (not to mention some of the problems with your witnesses).  

You know about trials, right?  They’re the places where you actually have to support your ideas with evidence.  And fact.  

But you don’t have that.  You’ve got “the sky is falling.”  You’re telling people that same sex marriage will destroy things.  

We’ve got Vermont.  

And New Hampshire.

And Massachusetts.  

And Connecticut.

And Iowa.  

(Yes, Iowa).

And New York.

And we’ve got those states as examples of places where same-sex marriage is not only legal, but where it’s just there, and soon enough will fade into the background.  No one seems to be confused these days when I fill out forms indicating my status as “married” and have a woman’s name listed as my spouse.  

In other words, it’s becoming normal.

And yes, I know that scares you.  Hell, my whole life I’ve been told I’m abnormal, and suddenly no one seems to feel that way, and even I’m confused some of the time.

But there it is.  

And last night, a New York sate senator who ran in opposition to same sex marriage, released a statement and voted “yes” for marriage equality.  

Saland, a long-standing senator, who previously voted against same sex marriage had his own statement, explaining how important it was that he vote his conscience.

And these two senators?  They’re in very conservative districts.  They know what they’re doing.  They may lose their chances at reelection because of this.  

They don’t care about this, because they’re doing what’s right not what’s politically expedient.

So you lost.

Again.  

So you’ve got a choice here.  You can, of course, hold onto your ideas.  You can keep fighting for your right to be afraid of gay people, and you can cloak it in such terms as “protect marriage” or use words like “sanctity” and other catch phrases that are, over time, going to just lose their meaning.  

You can waste time and energy with your bigotry and hostility.

But before you decide… just take a deep breath for a moment and think about this:

You know those people in their 70’s who talk about interracial marriage with that sneer in their voice that everyone else rolls their eyes at?  The ones who people just kind of forgive for their hideous prejudices because they’re too old to learn to be any better?  

That’s you.

Maybe not today.  Maybe not in five years.  But in ten years?  Possibly.  In 20, almost definitely.

You’ve got a limited window here to be on the right side of history.  It’s your choice to decide where you want to be here, but that chance won’t last forever.  And I’m telling you now, that if you don’t get it soon, you’re going to be left in the dustbin of history, without any real opportunity for redemption.

Because for you, from this point on?  

It. Gets. Worse.  

16 thoughts on “It. Gets. Worse.

  1. Well written piece; however, the attack on those in their 70s and older is misguided at best.  My experieince tells me that older Vermonters in particular are more accepting of newer social norms than many younger people.  I doubt that age is a criteria for prejudice.

  2. It is a good victory for the lgbt movement that New York has given equal rights to marriage. Still I’m not a big fan of marriage remembering the feminist case against it, its origins as a property contract. The very word family from the latin familius meaning a man and his slaves. At the same time the ability to take their own relationships more seriously that marriage confers has probably been a good thing for the queer community.

    It’s also been interesting to note that we never had more straight allies and supporters than for this cause. I guess everyones happier if we all agree to have state sanctioned relationships with property involved. And yeah age isn’t the problem.

  3. I am happy for New York and for marriage equality. What a great gift for Pride Day!

    And there are a number of exemptions in the bill as passed. Religious groups and their nonprofit corporations are exempt. The media has persisted in suggesting that the provision has to do with the Knights of Columbus not being sued for refusing to rent their hall to a queer couple for a wedding or a reception. I’ve seen no one so far discuss what it means for a Catholic hospital to be exempt from recognizing the marriage of a same-sex couple, should one spouse or the other be unfortunate enough to land in one via car accident or mugging or some other bad event. Not to mention that said Catholic hospital will be actively discriminating against any gay or lesbian nurses or docs or janitorial staff or radiology techs who decide to get married.

    The original bill sent by Governor Cuomo to the legislature-and passed by the Assembly-said that “religious corporations” and “benevolent organizations” “shall not be required to provide accommodations, advantages, facilities or privileges related to the solemnization or celebration of a marriage.”

    The amendments agreed upon Friday added the same exemptions for not-for-profit corporations that are “operated, supervised, or controlled by a religious corporation,” as well as employees who are “managed, directed, or supervised by” any of the above types of organizations. [emphasis added]

    Finally, there’s the “inseverability” poison pill. If any of the religious exemptions (or any other part of the law) is found to be unconstitutional, then the whole bill is rendered null and void.

    Message for the President: Evolve Faster, Mr. “Fierce Advocate.” Take a lesson from Andrew Cuomo on what real advocacy looks like. Repeal DOMA now.

    NanuqFC

    An unjust law is a code that a numerical or power majority group compels a minority group to obey but does not make binding on itself. ~ Martin Luther King, Jr.

    [irony on][T]he rights afforded every citizen under our Constitution mean nothing if we do not protect those rights – both from unjust laws and violent acts. ~ US President Barack Obama [/irony]

  4. should be, with minor revision, used as the anthem of these assholes.  (Song should be renamed too.  Assholes is better.  Not insulting to the union coal miners of decades ago.) Yes, they are losing and times are changing.  Blacks, Jews, Women, Gays.  Perhaps soon, they will have to turn their asshole Christian wrath on the Disabled.  Wouldn’t put it past them.

Comments are closed.