Zero visibility, zero ceiling, Dubie lands

 Brian Dubie is pre-certified, for Category III landing approaches. “I don’t have to call the FAA for a permit” He wants to handle environmental enforcement and permitting in a similar way.

Once again reaching deeply into his stock of pre-certified examples he addresses this question from the Free Press: When the interests of economic growth and environmental protection are in direct conflict, which carries more weight?

In my job as an airline captain I am regulated by the FAA. I am certified to make a “Category III approach” — meaning I can land my aircraft in zero visibility and zero ceiling (clouds). Because I am pre-certified by the FAA when I am making an approach on a dark and stormy night, I don’t have to call the FAA and ask for a permit to land the plane*[see Dubie made easy below]….

I look at many environmental permits the same way. First, there is no room for error. But there is room for simplification.

If we certified engineers and architects, contractors, materials and best practices — if we required regular recertification — and if the penalty for noncompliance is loss of certification, we could streamline and speed up the process and devote more resources to enforcement. That’s the right way to target our resources. It’s also a responsible way to grow our economy.

Target our resources and let pre-certified engineers, architects and contractors handle the new streamlined process. Kind of like the Mineral Management Service and their de-facto pre-certifying of the oil drilling industry. MMS followed wholesale a set of best practices adopted directly from the American Petroleum Institute.

Evidence that the oil and gas industry had captured MMS abounds: oil and gas company employees filled out official inspection forms in pencil for the MMS inspectors to trace over in pen; the industry cut and pasted Environmental Assessments from drilling projects in other parts of the world with no oversight from MMS (as evidenced by the inclusion of walruses — a cold water species which lives in Alaska — as a species of concern in the Gulf of Mexico); and MMS adopted wholesale a set of "best practices" for oil and gas drilling straight from the American Petroleum Institute, and then made these best practices only suggestions

* Dubie made easy: For those who do not have FAA Category III approach clearances and may be having trouble following Dubie’s reasoning:  People with drivers licenses don’t have to get a permit from the state each time they park their car. No room for error and always room to simplify?  

11 thoughts on “Zero visibility, zero ceiling, Dubie lands

  1. Dubie’s proposal to let the licensed professional assume the responsibility of say an Act 250 response has a number of consequences.

    1.  The developer client pays the A/E (architect/engineer) to give them a successful application at the least price.  Now they can probably get one every time…. and cheaper than before in order to ensure repeat work with a large client.   When it comes to a firm’s financial survival some A/E principals may not do the right thing.

    2.  Added liability raises professional insurance rates, and firm overhead costs.

    3.  Some A/E will skirt corners and that mistake may cause irreparable harm to the environment, which in turn may cause illness and injury to the public.  A massive lawsuit may occur with the A/E firm eventually out of business. Perhaps this is the keystone of Dubie’s argument for why this idea might fly… but we are talking one bad apple caught out of perhaps many more who aren’t… to the long term detriment of the public good.

    4.  As a licensed A/E who has been on a team that shepherded an Act 250 application through the process I can say that independent reviews are a good thing… since no one is perfect a few more eyes looking to make sure the application is good is a layer of public protection I am not willing to throw away.

  2. These are the issues that the average voter often overlooks, but  which are crucial to the economic future of the state.  Dubie, like Douglas, would gladly carve-up our woods and farmlands to serve the short-term interests of corporate greed without considering the long-term impact on Vermont’s greatest natural resources: our land and our water.

  3. I know how to ride a bike, therefore Vermont Yankee should be able to dump strontium into our water table.

    Did I play the game right?  What do I win?

  4. “Eight years in office as Governor Douglas’ Co-Pilot extraordinaire and he hardly breaks 50% over any of the Democrats.”

    True, but the demos are way below him.  

Comments are closed.