It's almost two years ago now that Anthony Pollina started his campaign to try to get the state's Democratic Party to support him in his run for governor. What he heard from me, and presumably others, was that there was one straightforward way to get the support of the Party: enter the Democratic primary and win.
Of course we know that he didn't do that, but he didn't run as a Progressive, either. Instead he ran as an Independent, polled a lower percentage of the vote than he received in his last statewide race, but counted that as a win because he didn't come in last.
It's another year, both the governor's and lite gov's seats are open, and liberals and progressives across the state are hoping to avoid the mistakes of years past, including setting up three-way races likely to lead to a minority Republican win. Part of this strategy involves focussing on winnable races. For instance, while the D's were scrambling for a candidate against Douglas two years ago, this year there are five announced candidates
For the Lite Gov seat there are multiple declared or possible candidates, but with a twist: David Zuckerman, a Progressive State Rep. from Burlington, has announced that he's thinking of a Lite Gov run in the Democratic primary.
Exactly the strategy some of us were urging on Pollina two years ago. While Vermont law says you can't appear on the ballot in two party primaries, there is no impediment to running on the primary of one party and launching a write-in campaign in another. Naturally, the only way this can possibly work is to run in the D primary and persuade your Prog supporters to write your name in. A few hundred write-ins and you're on the ballot as the fusion D-P (or P-D) candidate, going head to head against the Republican.
Last night Zuckerman took the first step down this path, meeting with the Washington County Democratic Committee. While making it clear that he hadn't decided whether to run, and what office he might run for (either Lite Gov or State Senate), Zuckerman laid out the key issues that would form the basis of his campaign, tok questions, and directly addressed the issue of electability.
The reaction of this favorably disposed observer was that Zuckerman was well received by the Democratic activists in attendance. His key issues of health care, agriculture and rural economic development, and environmental protection are all well within the Vermont Democratic mainstream. The answers he gave to the questions from the committee were detailed, fluent, and showed a good command of the issues.
What may be more important is that he was open and approachable, emphasized the importance of looking at the future and on where we can work together, and explicitly called for both sides to drop the old fights of who did who wrong in the last election, or the one before that, or the one before that, or . . . You get the picture.
This is Step One. He's met with one county committee, talked directly about how he would overcome the obstacles that any Prog would have in getting Democrats and Republicans to vote for him, and came away with good feelings on both sides. Over the next month or two Democrats in other counties can expect a visit. How those visits go will tell us a lot about our chances in November.
to end up with Zuckerman running for LG on the Dem ticket (and a very smart strategy to try and clear the field for him). It strikes me it would bring an end to the nasty split, and open the way to an IRV bill, and do a lot of other things to insure that Vt. gets the small-p progressive governance its demographics would support. Also, he strikes me as a very good guy.
An interesting test of the maturity of both the Ds and the Ps
He’s my rep. and I gave him and Chris two enthusiastic votes, but he’d be a great asset in the executive. Obviously this would open up his seat, at which point I would be curious to see who wants to fill it. Maybe we can get chris back…
I’m for it. P-D
Question: is there a difference between a left leaning D and a P other than one of political expediency?
I don’t really detect any.
I like Zuckerman and I hope he runs, although I have to admit I don’t really know the guy and only spoke with him once.
I guess the difference lies in how I posed the question.
There is a difference between a conservative or blue dog D and a P.
Just my musings.
PJ
Although I can’t say that David Zuckerman and I are friends — he lives in Burlington and I now live 26 miles away in Huntington and we’re only barely acquainted with each other, not having chatted in a couple of years — I do like him a lot as a person as well as an elected official (I do miss his trademark ponytail, though).
Having said that, I’d much prefer that Zuckerman run for the state Senate, rather than for lieutenant governor.
The reason is simple: Name recognition. To successfully win a statewide race, you have to be fairly well-known across the state. Zuckerman is a virtual unknown outside Chittenden County. Even within Chittenden County, Zuckerman doesn’t have a lot of name recognition outside Burlington.
To be sure, running a statewide race is a great way to build name recognition. But a statewide campaign is a very expensive proposition in this day and age — and unless you’re already a well-known figure statewide, it would be difficult for Zuckerman to raise money to run an effective campaign for lite-gov.
Hence, my recommendation that Zuckerman run for the state Senate.