Looking ahead to game 4 of the World Series, but I'm feeling a little grim. I've been rooting for the Phillies who lost the crucial Game 3, largely because of a bizarre decision by Phillies starter Cole Hamels. Tom Verducci at Sports Illustrated explains:
When Pettitte stepped in, Hamels was working with a 3-2 lead, a runner at second base and — here's the key part — one out. Pettitte is a career .134 hitter who has come to bat a total of 12 times over the past three years. Hamels could dispose of him with fastballs, the way J.A. Happ would do the next inning, and he would be one out away from being out of the inning. Instead, Hamels threw a first-pitch curveball up, and Pettitte slapped a single to tie the game. Why in the world would he throw something slow — and up, no less — to an American League pitcher?
What a screwup. An obvious screwup. Anybody who knows anything about baseball knows that – and it cost the whole team. So what did Hamels have to say for himself?
“I made the right pitch to Pettitte,” Hamels explained. “A pitcher doesn't hit an oh-and-oh curve in a bunting situation.” I was incredulous. I had to follow up, and asked him, “Just to clarify, you thought Pettitte was bunting, so you threw a breaking ball up to try to get him to pop up a bunt?”
“Yes,” Hamels said. “That's what I get my fair share of the time when I'm bunting. He swung and got a hit.
Baseball is very, very difficult to understand sometimes.”
This had nothing to do with bunting. This was not a bunt situation. Sounds like a guy who screwed up and doesn't have an excuse for himself, so he's trying to recast the whole thing into something different to make himself look less bad.
Hamels clearly did not regard the pitch to Pettitte as a mistake. I couldn't believe it. There is no way Pettitte is bunting there. There is virtually no advantage to be gained from moving a runner from second to third and be left with two outs… It's Baseball 101.
A terrible call. A costly call. A big mistake that could be the turning point for the whole Series. Here's a pitcher who's got too much pride to own up to his goof… so much that he can't even talk about his actual screwup without trying to change the subject to Burlington Telecom… er, I mean a bunt situation…
Wait – what were we talking about again?
here but then I realized Hamels’ cap has a “P” on it. OMG!
Yes, and then there was that bizarre situation of Damon running to third and no phillie at third to take the throw for the easy out. Are the phillies playing against themselves? In tomorrow’s game the yanks will win it. I despise the yankees and wanted to see them get beaten, but the Phillies are making it seem like they are trying not to win, which is sad, since they really started it off well.
seen Jonathan Leopold’s 10/26 remarks to the City Council?
if not, I encourage you to do so
http://www.cctv.org/watch-tv/p…
I have had no involvement in the events surrounding BT or internal discussions about BT; and I only just saw this video today; I think it’s quite compelling and am inclined to think that what we’ve been told is a “screw-up” is nothing of the sort (much more heated terms have been used)
I’ve known Jonathan for over 20 years and (like others) was shocked by the accusations made against him; his presentation to the council on the 26th has answered a lot of questions for me and I hope you will take the time to view it
LOL, now that is a succint description of politics as we know it:)