I've been pleased as far as Obama's opposition to offshore drilling; it does nothing to alleviate gas prices, there's plenty of untapped oil leases already in possession by the oil companies, there are serious environmental risks, and most importantly, it's not helping to get that petroleum needle out of the nation's arm.
The GOP has done the typical – take advantage of the low-information voter unaware of the above things (and of course, the many on the right who know but could care less about those issues), as well has have their current obstructionist hissy fit in D.C. So I've been pleased how Obama wasn't playing that game. Until now. Sweet Jee-zus McGee, this is getting old:
Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama said Friday he would be willing to support limited additional offshore oil drilling if that's what it takes to enact a comprehensive policy to foster fuel-efficient autos and develop alternate energy sources.
Shifting from his previous opposition to expanded offshore drilling, the Illinois senator told a Florida newspaper he could get behind a compromise with Republicans and oil companies to prevent gridlock over energy.
Uh, Senator, when the GOP oil-company stooges are sitting on their hands, sometimes gridlock is better than what they have in store. When are you going to figure that out?
The real silliness to all of this, is like the recent FISA rollover, it simply doesn't need to happen. Here, you have the GOP firmly in the pocket of Big Oil, presenting a “solution” that does nothing to allevieate current problems, but now Obama needs to “compromise”? Bullshit.Here's why:
Polls indicate these attacks have helped McCain gain ground on Obama.
Ok, Barack, so you're running against a guy who can barely hold a coherent thought, has resorted to using Britney Spears and Paris Hilton in an attack ad (showing once again how out of touch McCain is, as they are soooo 2007), and is about as popular and charismatic as a litterbox in a 3 cat household that hasn't been changed in two weeks. So instead of standing up for principle on something you could truly take the lead on, you're caving. Again. And you don't have to.
Is it that “abused spouse syndrome” (or whatever they call it) that has plagued the Dems for so long still gnawing at Obama's spine? These things are not helping. Stoller:
I'm sure the Republicans are going to praise Obama for his flexible stance now that he's decided to push a compromise with their oh so practical agenda. There's no way they will use this to push the idea that he's unprincipled. They wouldn't dare set up a web site called http://www.bothwaysbarack.com/
Awesome. And awesome position that he's put Pelosi in, who has refused to allow a vote on driling in the House.
Of course, these things often incur the “that does it, I'm staying home/voting for Nader/LaRouche/my neighbor's dog” commentary.With three more months to go, my guess is there'll be a few more moments like this.
Hell with it, I'm voting for Jack McCullough, and I don't care if he's not even running. We need a president with a beard again, it's been too long.