Monthly Archives: November 2007

Of Babies, Luddites and Candidates for Governor…

Getting caught up on some things…

  • Hmf. Soapblox's new code apparently eliminated the "Draft Diaries" feature. WIth it went my second examination of the Gubernatorial pretenders, this one focusing on Peter Galbraith. Look for that tomorrow, if you care. Mutter, grumble…

  • Republicans gone wild! Somebody put something in the water in the last week. John McLaughry is apparently striking back after getting trounced in his debate with Bill McKibben, as his latest multi-front proclamations of global warming denial are nothing less than screeds. Last week's piece in the Free Press (followed by a piece on VPR today I heard about but did not hear) was a doozy (emphasis added):

    The report advocates the creation of a "vigorous, proactive, public/private partnership to promote "enormous, systemic and long-term cultural, cross-generation change in our awareness and behavior through the efforts of our formalized K-12 public and private school systems." (Whew!) Cynics will doubtless refer to this as the "Green Madrassa" proposal, whereby our environmentally certified schoolteachers are instructed to fill up their pupils with certified "Green Theology."

    Wow. What a strange, bitter world Mr. McLaughry must reside in to have such contempt for science and the people busting their butts to make things better. 

  • More goofy is this diary at Vermont Tiger. Part of their schtick of late is apparently to attend left-oriented functions and write condescending, distorted reports on what they experienced. It's unfortunate, as the site tends to be a bit more above board in general. Their report on the Environmental Action conference in VTC two weeks ago was kind of funny, however. It's entitled In The Camp Of The Luddites, which gives you a sense of its flavor.

    I was one of the "Luddites" in attendence. I actually presented a workshop with my fellow left-wing Luddite, Philip Baruth. Our Luddite topic? Using technology and the web to promote ideas and campaigns. You know, classic Luddite stuff. Didn't see Mario at that one. 

  • In happier news, Prog uber-organizer Peter Sterling just became a father. Congrats to the new parents. 

Live Blogging from Dartmouth Impeachment

I'm sitting in Filene Auditorium at Dartmouth, waiting for the festivities to begin.  The Impeach Bush & Cheney banner has been hung, and the room is rumbling with the sound of excited people.

Dan DeWalt, Adrienne Kinne, and John Nichols have arrived. The Kucinch folks are everywhere. Tim Carpenter of Progressive Democrats of America is handing out stickers and flyers. 

I'll try to keep up with the speakers and will likely do multiple updates over the evening, so I won't lose everything if the connection drops. 

All the meat will appear in the extended text.

TV Crews have set up in the back of the room, the space is nearly full and people are still filing in. The fun starts in just a couple of minutes.


I’ll see if I can get a couple of pictures to post later.

ALL OF THE FOLLOWING IS PARAPHRASED. I can’t type that fast.

Dan’s opening remarks:

Northeast Impeachment Coalition, PDA, Women Making a Difference, Code Pink, After Downing Street are sponsors for tonight.


Dartmouth College maintains non-partisan stance and does not co-sponsor events.


We will present what’s happening in New England now, then onto featured speakers. Livestreaming is being provided courtesy of the Kucinich folks.


The New England Impeachment Coalition was founded in July ’07, as result of groups throughout NE joining together. It has grown quickly. NJ, NY, and even places not in the Northeast have joined. Bringing back constitutional rule is going to be the role of the citizen, since Congress has decided not to do its duty. If we have candidates in office who will not stand up and defend the constitution, we’ll have to run our own people against them.  Introduced CT and ME candidates.  Stated that there will be a candidate against Peter Welch.


Speaker: John Kaminsky, Maine Lawyers for Democracy.

Founded in 2005 to protect civil rights and civil liberties. Detailed [PDF format] position paper on web. Covers impeachment in its historical context.

(and) Maine Campaign to impeach

We collected signatures around Maine to demonstrate that Mainers are serious about impeachment – and got 15,000 signatures. We used them as a springboard to get legitimacy with congresspeople and decision-makers. On Sept 25 & 26, 2007 people went to Maine Congressional offices. As a result, Mike M. is deliberating, and has voted against tabling the Kucinich bill (HRes 333).


The days of Nixon were the last time we were in this situation. By comparison in Oct. 1973, 28% of Americans said Nixon should be impeached and removed. This was after a full summer of Watergate hearings. The number rose to 55% the day before he resigned. After all the investigations and hearings, that was the high water mark.


Let’s look at today. First, 64% say President Bush has abused his power. 55% say the Pres has committed impeachable offenses. Out of those 55%, many go further and say he should be removed from office right now.


We have in this country the people having the wisdom that our congress and media do not have right now. We have people who have the wisdom to recognize what’s going on, even before hearings and media coverage. It’s time to join the people in supporting impeachment.


John Nirenberg is introduced to a standing ovation.


Speaker: Betty Hall, NH House of Reps:


I was in the house back in the 70’s. We had a legislator who introduced one of the 1st impeachment resolutions in a state legislature. He introduced it, gave a fiery speech, got exactly 11 votes. I was not one of those votes. I have regretted that every day of my life since. Last Spring, I decided “I’m not going to wait to next fall,” I decided to introduce an impeachment resolution last Spring. I spoke to the rules committee, made my case, and they voted not to let me introduce the resolution. I asked for a suspension of the rules and did it anyway. I got 40 votes. But it’s not enough.

We need to learn and understand about impeachment. I didn’t have an inkling of it during the Nixon vote. We need to have more of this kind of meeting, to learn, throughout the state, and maybe a teach-in for the NH legislature.

[applause]

In any case, it will come to the legislature in January. I hope you all come to the public hearings and make sure the legislature understands impeachment before they have to vote on it.


Q: Do you need co-sponsors?

Betty: It’s too late for it. But please talk to your legislators.


Speaker: Tim Carpenter, introduced as the President of Progressive Democrats of America:

There’s no president at PDA, it’s a citizen lobby group.


We were founded the last day the Democrats met in the election of 2004 – when they nominated John Kerry at the convention. We believed, at the end of the convention, that 80% of those who believed we should end the war and redeploy our troops never got the vote we wanted.

We believed that grassroots democrats could organize around the country to repeal the patriot act, end the war, and ensure fair & transparent elections. It’s our belief that grassroots activists can make the change.


When the Democrats were the minority, John Conyers held hearings in the basement of the House, he began hearings in Washington on Oversight and Accountability that we believed would lead to impeachment. We believe in working with legislators on the inside and grassroots democrats like Dan DeWalt and others. Many of us were excited when the democrats won. We did not get a majority of progressive democrats, instead we got democrats who still need to hear from the grassroots.


We’re here tonight to ask you to continue to support the members of Congress who work for impeachment.


Be visible about your support of impeachment. Wear buttons, use bumper stickers, slip your dinner guests “impeach mints.”


We need to challenge incumbents!

Dan D:

Last spring we did a tour with John Nichols, Cindy Sheehan, and 3 veterans. One of those vets, Adrienne Kinne, is now seeing another side of war at the VA.


Speaker: Adrienne Kinne:


I am here because I am a veteran. I was active duty in 1994 – 1998. I was an interpreter. After 2001, things drastically and dramatically changed for the worse. When I started, never would we have considered spying on an American citizen. Never. I remember once an American’s name showed up. It wasn’t even someone speaking on the call, and we removed every single trace.


After 9/11, everything changed. We were intercepting phone communications from a whole swath. In the beginning it made sense, as we were learning the new equipment. Suddenly we started noticing that these were American citizens, just ordinary citizens: the Red Cross, journalists, aid organizations. You started to question why we were doing this. We were told we were given permission to listen to Americans “just in case.” In case some aid worker accidentally came across someone from al Quaeda, or something. The constitution and our constitutional rights should not be waived “just in case.”

These were not just communications in the Middle East, but also their conversations home. We were told to just kind of “forget what the people in the United states had to say,” report on the part that originates in the Middle East. They said they had waived law in the US to make this legal.


I came to realize the significance of our oath to protect the constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, when going into the service and what it means.

Iraq Vets Against the War has grown tremendously over the last 10 months – more than tripled our members.


The fact that Congress does not want to listen to the people does not absolve us of our duty to protect the constitution.


In Iraq, raids on houses, abducting Iraqis at any time for no reason, killing people who are driving up to checkpoints – this happens not because of individual soldiers, but because these are policies our government has forced upon our soldiers.

Speaker: Dan D:

This war will not end under this President.

When I was younger, I worked in the city where Dennis Kucinich had been elected Mayor. Once, there was a major snow storm that shut much of the city down, but the mayor was not the kind of guy to sit around and wait for things to happen. The next thing you knew, Mayor Kucinich was plowing the airport because it was the only way to get the job done. I’m really honored to be able to introduce you to the one person in Congress who has supported the constitution, who has stood tall above all others.


Speaker: Dennis Kucinich:


Thank you for your commitment to the principles of democratic government. The very idea that prayer for gov of by and for the people is for each generation.


When I read the declaration of independence, I am struck by founders who pledged their unity. We understand that it is all on the line today. Our very democracy is in danger.

As a member of congress I have seen this systematic destruction of our democratic principles. You can look at the Bill of Rights, you can see, chapter and verse, its destruction. Giving the government the right to reach deeply into people’s personal lives. There’s this fear of personhood, privacy, which is essential to ensure each of us is free of government intrusion.


You find things you couldn’t believe happening, like HRes 1955 – only 6 voted against it. Once again I voted against it because I read it. Section 1603 of the Defense bill broke down the Posse Commitatus act, allowing the President to use our troops against us.

We are at a moment in time when we realize that our democracy is on the line.


Why after introducing HRes 333 in April did I find it necessary to come forward with HRes 799 a couple of weeks ago? What changed?


There were no hearings on 333, despite growing approval of on the bill. So I submitted 799 as privileged resolution.

The defense budget calls for spending 10 mil to retrofit B2 stealth bombers to carry 30k ton bombs (massive ordinance penetrators). Analysts all said these will be used to drop bombs on nuke research labs in Iran. If dropped, there will be a tremendous energy release, blowing dust and debris high up into the atmosphere, creating radioactive fallout, hundreds if not thousands of miles across the continent.


I had no choice but to bring this through under privileged resolution. It resonated with article 3 of HRes 333 about the VP beating drums of war against Iran.


Impeachment is the one remedy for this administration to stay the trip down the warpath. By taking it off the table, they (the democratic leadership) are licensing the violation of the constitution and international law by pres and VP. Neither leadership nor any other member of congress has the right to not do their constitutional duty.


When I hear: “We have more important things to do.”


I say “What?”


I hear “They’ll be gone in 14 months.”


I say: “They can do a lot of damage in that time. It doesn’t take long to attack a country that has no capacity to attack us.”


Each one of us has the responsibility and the honor to restore our nation.


Speaker: John Nichols:


I don’t know what unnatural quirk of the planetary order has occurred that would have me speaking after someone who should be the pres of the united states, but I will take it as an illustration of our democratic principles in this country that the president is second only to a citizen.


There are so many friends and comrades allies in this audience.


None of this happens without Dan DeWalt.


Liza Earle is a baker and day care provider, she had never gone to town meeting before. Came to some of our events, rustled up the courage to go to her town meeting to submit articles of impeachment.


When we toured VT we thought New Englanders might not want to listen to out-of-staters, we suggested that they should. This country would be tremendously well served to have a knowing and caring veteran to represent us in the Congress.


One of the other vets was Matt Howard.

Recently Matt went to Australia. The president was there as well. President had gone to thank John Howard who was the Prime Minister of the time. He turned to prime minister and said “Thank you for sending the Austrian troops to Iraq.”


John Howard has been thrown out.  [applause]


Matt told story of his service in Iraq. they went out of Kuwait city, after 1/2 hr of training. A young marine jumped out, raised his arm with a fist to say halt. The car stopped, in it were a father with his children, wife, relatives. the father stopped, rolled down the window and returned what he thought was the international sign of solidarity (raised arm clenched fist). Then he pulled forward. The marines shot everyone in the car. That night, as the soldiers slept in the truck, the young marine stirred in his sleep screaming. Matt held him, and said, “It’s ok, bad things happen in a war.”

But bad things don’t “happen” in a war. Bad things happen when you send them unprepared, and untrained to fight.


120 soldiers a week now commit suicide.


When I hear stories like that, I despair.


When I hear our presindent speak and talk of more surge, I despair.


When I hear VP casually discuss launching a more dangerous and deadly war against the more powerful and connected state of Iran, I despair.


When I see congress fail to uphold the end of the war, I despair.


When I see people come out from across New England in a rainy night. I realize I do not have the privilege of despair.


Courage patriots, the republic is in danger, the constitution is under attack, democracy itself undermined. We are the descendants of those who fought a revolution against a king named George.


I say to you my name is John Nichols and I want to impeach the president and vice president of the United States.


I want to impeach them for their attack on this constitution of the United States. Because they shredded the constitution, because they undermined the separation of powers when they lied to congress, because

they have spied on the American people when the constitution of the us gives us freedom in our homes from intervention, because they have sanctioned torture and extaordinary rendition.


Some people want to impeach because they violated the Geneva conventions, but we don’t have to go to the Geneva conventions, we have only to go to the 8th amendment.

When Cheny authorizes torture, he commits an impeachable offense.


I want to impeach them because of what they did to Wilson and Plame.


The 3rd article in Nixon’s impeachment was for use of office to punish political foes.


When they used their office to punish Joe Wilson for speaking out, they committed an impeachable offense.


I didn’t come up with these ideas myself. I read the notes to the constitutional convention.


George Mason, author, wrote: No instrument in this document is more important than the power to impeach, for if we cede our power to impeach, we cede the ability to hold the president accountable. If we do not have power to impeach, we make him a king for 4 years.


Jefferson: without impeachment, we have a monarch for 4 years, with no difference between him and a king.


Oh, but it is a time of war. We must support the troops! Well, we do support the troops. But keep in mind, Mason said: “War is the true wet nurse of executive aggrandizement, to empty the treasury of resources …, to destroy even the freedoms that the war was supposedly launched to defend.”


Wars waged illegally and immorally are the highest of high crimes.

James K. Polk started the Mexican American war, claiming an attack by Mexico on America.

A young congressman was elected from the Midwest, and went to Washington. He offended party the leaders.

He said from the Well of the House to the President: “Show me the spot on which a single Mexican shed a single drop of American blood. If you cannot, then show me why you should not be removed from your office.”

When Polk did not answer, the congressman censured James K Polk, saying essentially “we honor the troops but not the one who sent them to an immoral war.”

When admonished that “you cannot attack the president in a time of war.”

The Congressman replied:

Allow the President to invade a neighboring nation whenever he shall deem it necessary to do so, whenever he may choose to say he deems it necessary for such purpose – and you allow him to make war at pleasure. Study to see if you can fix any limit to his power in this respect, after you have given him so much as you propose.

If today, he should choose to say he thinks it necessary to invade Canada, to prevent the British from invading us, how could you stop him? You may say, “I see no probability of the British invading us” but he will say to you, “be silent; I see it, if you don’t.”

The provision of the Constitution giving the war making power to Congress was dictated, as I understand it, by the following reasons: Kings had always been involving and impoverishing their people in wars, pretending generally, if not always, that the good of the people was the object. This, our Convention understood to be the most oppressive of all Kingly oppressions; and they resolved to so frame the Constitution that no one man should hold the power of bringing this oppression upon us.

I was not elected to serve a king.

Abraham Lincoln.


Q & A Session

Q: How do we change the mind of Peter Welch?

A (Kucinich): The people of Vermont can do that. Continue to talk to him.

A (Nichols): The force you use on this issue IS having an impact. The media will not tell you that.


Q: Why is impeachment off the table?

A (Kucinich): It seems that the political calculus is that the more offenses pile up on this administration, the more Republican loyalty will be brought to a lower and lower level. I think it’s a cold calculating attempt, in the same way the democrats put ads on tv against the Republicans’ war funding plans, then turned around to fund the war.


Duplicity is the word that was made for this moment.  The word duplicity has found its hour. We cannot permit this to count as governance.


It’s just incompetence.


Q: Welch voted for H. Res. 1955:

In response to a constituent, he replied: “The law doesn’t criminalize any activity.”

A: (Kucinich) It’s trying to criminalize thought.

There’s an effort to break down thought, word, deed, free speech. When you start to criminalize thought [missed]


Q: How did 400 congressman, after they read that bill pass it?


A: (Kucinich) People don’t read these bills. You get a dozen bills, some a few pages, some a hundred. Comes from your side, and vote for it. It was a democrat’s bill – Jane Harmon’s bill. They don’t read the bill, they look at the title.


This is what we’re faced with.


Then when they’re called on it, you see gymnastics that are olympian in their grandeur, but pathetic in their implications.


A: (Nichols) Most of the pathologies in this bill were also in the patriot act. It was much harder to vote against the patriot act, due to the tenor of the times.


You now hear Chris Dodd talking about how much he loves the constitution. Then why didn’t he love it enough to vote against the patriot act? It mattered at the time when the votes happened.


Q: (battery recharge needed, so I missed this one, it was 9/11 related)


Q: (Jimmy Leas) Many speakers have given reasons to impeach. We need to start thinking about them as the steps a government takes … towards dictatorship. It’s enough that our president tortures people. Once it starts moving from people in other countries, it’s going to creep toward us. Once that happens, nobody is going to stand up. When people start being afraid of being tortured, they stop speaking out. We are the ones who are the victims, because our rights are at stake. It [this effort] is to stop the next war, the current war, and preserve our constitution. We have to work so hard to build the movement, so we don’t go further down this path toward dictatorship (turned out to be a comment – no question)

Q: Republicans were going to vote against tabling H. Res 333 to embarrass democrats. I was very confused. I looked into it. I thought, what could be embarrassing to Democrats about that? When you investigate Cheney the people who should be embarrassed about it would be the republicans.

I looked into it and came up with PACs, the big pacs are oil & gas. The Republicans wanted to expose the democrats as listening to the PACs that fund them instead of listening to the people, and embarrass the democrats in the eyes of their constituents.


I am not going to be afraid to be called a name for telling the democratic leadership to stop listening to the PACs, and start listening to us. [this was another comment]


A: (Didn’t see who spoke?) We are facing a culture of intimidation – torture, wire tapping to deprive people of civil rights and liberties to make us apprehensive about speaking out for the constitution, civil liberties and this country. We don’t have the luxury of despair or of being intimidated.


A: (Nichols) I interviewed Bernstein: he says there’s no question they should be impeached. “What’s different now,” I asked? The Congress is dramatically more bought than in the 1970s. But more serious is our media. Media is invested in power. On bended knee. Media that does the work of the powerful, reinforces those in power. They’ve played the media brilliantly.


Believe me, amazing things are happening, but you won’t hear about them on TV or the radio.


I have great hope that we can fix this mess. The only thing that worries me, is our media. We can roll over Congress. Our media is in a crisis.


I don’t hear candidates talk about media reform.


A: (Dan)It’s not just Fox and Murdoch and CBS and NBC. Recently, I spoke with public media head (alan ?). “Let’s have a program about it.”


He replied, “No, it’s not an issue.”

A: (Tim:) Visit AfterDowningStreet.org

Invite people like John N., David Swanson, and others to meetings like this. Begin those kitchen table conversations.


Ask you congress member to call for hearings in judiciary on HRes 333.


Q: Had an epiphany, had copies of sample resolution for impeachment. Fill in your town’s name, go to your town, and put it in for town meeting. Talked with Secretary for my town: she said the warrants closed. Guess what, they weren’t.


You have to stay on it, want to have it happen. Before I went to the 1st places, I was afraid of what people would say. When I sat with 500 people, I knew our Republic was about done. It’s a very simple concept – when our country was founded, we were separating ourselves from the monarchies. We would not kneel to a king and be strung up for asking why if told to fight a war.

In a republic, you are the sovereign, I am the sovereign. We don’t get down on our knees.

We shouldn’t feel that someone else is going to do this work for us.

Q: On media and impeachment, when Dennis Kucinich filed HRes 333, there was a blackout. I begged for a lawsuit against media. Overwhelming evidence of 911 being fixed. John N., please look at this and start writing about and publishing.


Prince Bandar says he warned Bush.


Q: How do we impart the passion we feel to the young people at the universities?

A: (Nichols) I get this question everywhere I go, on every issue. Young people make a realistic choice not to be engaged in the political process because they see nothing come of it. Something you can do: Stop being PUNDITS. It’s the biggest disease going: stop talking about electability, and how you need electability to succeed, there’s no idealism in that. Young people respond to idealism – a promise that something real can happen. The candidate that has touched most young people in this campaign: Ron Paul. When he stared Giuliani down and said there are reasons this country was attacked and 9/11 occurred, and people, young people were watching and said “yeah! you’re right.”


Attract young people by voting your conscience, acting upon your conscience, and making real the idealistic options.

Young people look at older folks and see older folks compromising. If we don’t hold up higher ideals, we won’t get young people to believe that this is a savable political process. You will find that young people will be what you want them to be if you are what they want you to be.


A (Kinne): At ISO, There were kids responding to what our country has never been and should be.


When we have actions not governed by “What won’t offend anybody” but by what do we need to do, the kids like it and get engaged.  They’re not so afraid of offending someone for a decent cause. I don’t think we’re going to pull this off without more kids. We have a long way to go. We need to stop limiting ourselves.


Q: I believe we need to be calling on a higher power and invoke the martyrs (Kennedy, Wellstone, etc.) who have given their lives, and we must honor them, because they really are with us.


A: We will only succeed if we truly believe that we will succeed and move forward and believe that we will succeed.


Q: I am a confused citizen. In any movement it’s important to understand the position of those who do not support the position in order to get them to change their position. Our democratic legislators seem to be sitting on the sidelines. Can you comment on the rationale for the democrats to not stand up?


A (Hall): Too much money and not enough courage. I don’t know why my colleagues don’t think the way I do. I got arrested and put in jail because I didn’t move. In court, they asked all the questions – did she do this or that wrong? The answer was no, so the case was dismissed.


Q: What are they afraid of?

A (DeWalt): The smear machine that kicks in when you stand up. Also have to face possibility that they’re members of the same team, but wearing different coat.

A (Nichols): I do a lot of right-wing talk radio shows willingly for sheer sport of talking to conservatives. I talk about impeachment. I think it’s relevant to this. I say, “I know you believe George Bush is touched by God. I believe he’s been touched as well. [laughter] I know you believe he’ll do the right thing, but do you really want to hand those powers over to president Hillary Clinton?” I’m always amused by the reaction.


I am afraid both parties like power, and like it so much, they don’t enjoy a discussion about disempowering the president because they’re afraid that we’ll start discussing disempowering others, too.


Jefferson envisioned the president becoming corrupted, the congress becoming corrupted, and even the media becoming corrupted. It is for that reason we rested all power in the people.


You’re the leaders, you guys have to do it.


A (?): In my darker moments I wonder what they might be afraid of: on wiretapping, Sr. members of Democratic party were briefed on wiretapping, and know they’re just as culpable.


Some are afraid that if we impeach, we won’t be able to elect a democratic president because they won’t have Bush to kick around anymore.


We can’t address this by focusing on fear, we must address it based on protecting the constitution, and handing down to the next generation a country they can be proud of like was handed to us.


Q: About the 120 soldiers committing suicide per week: do those include returned or in-field?

A (Nichols): Returned. Not all are Iraq vets, some are Vietnam vets. There’s a dramatic surge in suicide. It’s the reason the administration and VA at fed level are not keeping unified set of stats.


I’ve interviewed returning troops – today you can pluck someone off the battlefield who would have died, send them to a hospital in Germany, then home to the VA, but the tragedy is survival in horrific condition. Part is because of that, but part is the mental agony from war.


Every single day we don’t just doom someone to die, we doom hundreds of young men and women to a future in which suicide will be a logical option. I counsel urgency because there are young men who will be ruined today, tomorrow, and every day we go forward. And that doesn’t count the innocent Iraqis.


A (DeWalt): Twice as many Vietnam vets have killed themselves as were killed in the war.


A (Kinne): I have worked with vets on PTSD. It’s not PTSD, it’s not a disorder, it’s having a conscience. When they are asked to commit war crimes and atrocities, when they come home and suffer guilt, then to be told that they have a disorder, there’s something wrong. It’s when you have leaders who send you to commit these atrocities with a clear conscience – that’s the disorder. 


Q: (John N. who’s walking to Pelosi’s office) For info, go to MarchInMyName.org. I urge you to give me pictures of you and your family to bring to Nancy Pelosi.


Q: My brother committed suicide on my birthday 2 years ago. We are all one. The thoughts and feelings are energy permeate all of existence. Everyone who has lost loved a one can understand that. I want people to realize that this world is terrifying the sensitive souls which exist here. They don’t want to express it in front of others because it “shows weakness.” I’m a radio operator, my call letters: W1JSB. I get on 80 meters, 40 meters, 20 meters, to share with people.

[at this point Dan D. takes a moment to acknowledge Nancy (last name?) put this together.]

Q: I’m tired of writing letters and emails to Congress. I think of other countries and when the get organized, they take to the streets. What’s it going to take for us to make a showing and be heard.


A (Nichols): The original sin of this whole moment: when they were not going to count the votes in Florida. People went into the streets about that in other countries, but we didn’t. We allowed the election to be stolen from us. We have another election coming. We invite all the sins that flow from the moment they steal an election.


Q: to John Kaminsky

In the Maine Lawyers for Democracy’s impeachment document articles, you parsed many things. There must have been information on 9/11 – how were they discarded from the impeachment articles?


A: Didn’t know a lot about the questions ’til the last 3 – 4 months. I had been looking at so much other evidence and focused on putting together strong supportable case that took advantage of the evidence before us now.


We don’t have a lot of evidence in handabout what really happened 9/11. My concern is a concern of urgency. We need to move forward now, with the case we have in our hands. I don’t mean to diminish the arguments on 9/11, I fear there would not be enough time during this administration’s time in office to accomplish a complete investigation of 9/11. I would hope next pres will appoint special prosecutor.


Q: The Right of Revolution is included in NH constitution (article 10) listed on back of tonight’s program. NH is the only state with the right of revolution. [… missed the rest as we prepared to head out, since the space was closed at this point]

iBrattleboro citizen journalism site sued for “libel”

Those of you that are blog addicts are well aware of the issue of a blog’s liability as well as “ownership” of comments, whether it be if a blog’s owner is legally responsible for the content in the comments section, or it be Bill O’Reilly bloviating about the worst comments in a section and trying to paint the whole blog as extreme as those comments. Apparently, the concept of trying to silence a blog by going after the owners is still a fresh one, as the owners of the community blog iBrattleboro (Brattleboro, VT) are now being sued for libel, over some comments that someone posted there. Go below the jump for more.

iBrattleboro is one of those great community blogs. It’s not just politics by any stretch of the imagination. It covers many aspects of the small city in southern Vermont: town news, arts and culture, business, education – the whole gamut of that vibrant community.

Apparently the libel hubbub stems from an allegation by a former executive director of Rescue, Inc. and organization that provides rescue services to the area’s communities. As the Brattleboro Reformer is reporting:

In the suit, which was filed in Windham County Superior Court Nov. 16, Rescue volunteer Effie Mayhew alleges that David Dunn, who served as executive director until resigning earlier this month, and ibrattleboro owners Chris Grotke and Lise LePage committed libel and “intentional infliction of emotional distress.”

The suit pertains to a Sept. 30 comment posted to the site by Dunn, who was responding both to a previous anonymous critique of his leadership style and a column Mayhew wrote in the Reformer. In the comment, Dunn accused Mayhew of conducting an adulterous affair on Rescue premises and said that others who had signed a petition requesting his resignation had engaged in similar behavior.

Did you get that? “The suit pertains to a Sept. 30 comment posted to the site by Dunn, who was responding both to a previous anonymous critique of his leadership style and a column Mayhew wrote in the Reformer.” So based on one man’s comment on the blog, the owners, Chris Grotke and Lise LePage now have to spend their time and money fighting off this lawsuit. Perhaps Dunn’s comments could indeed make him responsible for libel. But to hold the blog’s owners responsible is absolutely ridiculous.

It’s really maddening, especially because at the bottom of the iBrattleboro site, there’s this…

All information and opinions expressed on these pages are the responsibility of their respective owners, and not of iBrattleboro.com. iBrattleboro.com reserves the right to refuse publication of any story and to remove posted comments, as we see fit.



Apparently, that last part wasn’t read by Mayhew. Her lawyer somehow thinks that Grotke and Page should have known better and taken the comments down on their own.

“They should have edited it out or e-mailed (Dunn) and said ‘we can’t publish it as it stands,'” Stone said. “I think their defense will be that they don’t read prior to publishing, but I’m not sure that will be enough to avoid some degree of liability.”

Smells funny to me. How about you? One thing that complicates this matter is that the legal matters regarding “new media and journalism” are still wading into uncharted territory in regards to liability, but the Communications Decency Act of 1996 seems to be pretty clear on this: “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.”

Regardless of how the suit goes against Dunn, the one against iBrattleboro is the essence of vindictive frivolity. Please stop by iBrattleboro and offer some kind words of support to Grotke and Page, should you feel so inclined.

crossposted at Daily Kos and five before chaos, because the word needs to spread about this. A rec over at Kos would be helpful and appreciated.

Obama Foreign Policy Forum: Live Video Stream

There’s an interesting live foreign policy discussion happening in New Hampshire today. Yes, it’s Obama related, but I think the discussion might be interesting for supporters of any candidate.

Here’s the schedule as I understand it…

9:00am EST
1st Panel: Renewing American Leadership

Panelists:  John Hutson, Tony Lake, Samantha Power, Susan Rice
Moderator:  Denis McDonough

10:00am EST
2nd Panel: Restoring America’s Military After Iraq

11:00am EST
Barack Obama
A Clear Choice for America: The Obama Foreign Policy

And here’s the live video stream…

For more info on the Forum:
http://nh.barackobam…

And if you’re having trouble with the stream, you can go here instead:
http://ustream.tv/ch…

MMHS Students Launch “Out of Our Schools – Out of Iraq”

(the following is from their official press release):

MMU Peace Club determined to amplify voices of high school students against the militarization of public schools and the war in Iraq.

Jericho, VT. After just two days of petitioning their classmates at Mt. Mansfield Union High School in Jericho to denounce 'purposeful misrepresentations' and oversimplifications by military recruiters in their school, the MMU Peace Club was able to gather 171 student and faculty signatures. The petition calls upon representatives Sanders, Leahy and Welch "to represent our collective discontent with this situation and do all that is in your power to change this legislation.” The legislation they refer to is No Child Left Behind.

Emily Coon of the MMU Peace Club explains, "Section 9528 of NCLB allows recruiters invasive access to our schools and our lives. Once in our schools, recruiters use deliberate misrepresentations, to gain the trust and confidence of the students. Enough is enough.” “There is a growing voice of opposition among youth here in Vermont and across the country, as more students realize their privacy is being violated in the military recruitment process. Also, recruiters downplay what we see right before our eyes. Every day we hear about more young people, including friends and family, losing their lives in Iraq and taking the lives of innocent Iraqis. All this to fight in a war that most students find more and more useless as the years wear on. Among our friends and peers, we’re finding that more students want to take action against both pervasive military recruitment and against the war,” Emily continued.

MMU student Phoebe Pritchett adds, “we are considering what actions we can take to project the huge number of hidden youth voices against these lies and deceptions in our schools and against the lies and deception behind this totally unjust, immoral, and corporate-driven war in Iraq." This week students re-open the petitioning drive at MMU but are setting their sights higher to schools throughout Vermont and across the country, launching a new campaign: “Out of Our Schools – Out of Iraq” The 'Out of Iraq' demand “calls upon high school students to learn about and use non-violent civil disobedience to intervene directly in all institutions that are waging this war.

Now is the time for students to do this as it becomes increasingly obvious our government, our parents and our teachers will not do it for us,” Phoebe explains. The ‘Out of our Schools’ demand will include, among other things, petitioning drives to put an end the NCLB condition that attaches school funding to the requirement for mandatory recruiters in schools, and challenge recruiters on the invasion of privacy. They will also engage in the development of partnerships with teachers, parents, vets and other peace and justice groups to challenge misrepresentations and deceptions by recruiters by intensifying ongoing counter-recruitment campaigns.

The MMU Peace Club started in 2004 for students to come together and affect positive change. They have raised money for organizations such as Heifer International, the Genocide Intervention Network, and Room to Read. In addition to fundraising they have been continually working on counter-recruitment by handing out information to students about the realities of war and serving in the military. If you are a high school student, teacher, vet, or peace and justice group that wants to get involved with the ‘Out of Our Schools Out of Iraq’ campaign, contact Phoebe Pritchett (kiwilover1234@riseup.net or 802-598-6721), Emily Coon (susurro7@riseup.net or 802-373-4641), or Ben Weber (mithrilbalrog@yahoo.com).

Analyzing the (Potential) Campaigns: Anthony Pollina

This week, I'm leaving the current events behind and taking a look at the four names being bandied about for the Democratic nomination for Governor: Matt Dunne, John Campbell, Peter Galbraith and Anthony Pollina. I'm starting with Pollina because I think the other ones will be relatively short, but looking at a potential Pollina candidacy means practically doing a freaking research paper, and I'd rather get the heavy lifting out of the way...

 

Look, let's be honest.  A Pollina administration would be a great thing. He would (presumably) clearly promote progressive policies from health care to economics. It would be a welcome change for all us lefties.

 

It would also be a great thing for ways that the Progressive Party true believers would likely not care to see; running as a Progressive-slash-Democrat would bring the parties together in ways the dogmatic sorts in both parties would prefer it didn't. Once in office, the reality of the hardwired political process would truly come into play, as Pollina would reach out to Democrats to help run the government in a day to day way, as well as to pass progressive legislation. The independently elected nature of the chief executive would continue to do what it historically does; polarize the political battlefield into two parties – the party of the executive, and that of the opposition. The party of the executive, in this case, would inevitably become a combination of Progs and Dems, permanently and institutionally merging them (and in the process, proving once again the hardwired intractability of the two-party system – but at least bringing us a little partisan peace in the process).

 

There's no question that Pollina would be a long shot – so long, that I honestly don't see him winning. Still, anything's possible, and if he becomes the nominee, it becomes the job of the rest of us to do what we can to make the impossible, possible and get him elected.

 

Any discussion of how it might happen requires we start with what the Progs have been telling themselves for years; that Pollina could peel off Republican voters in a way that no Democrat could, based on his 2002 performance in a few counties during the three-way race for Lieutenant Governor against Brian Dubie and Peter Shumlin.

First of all, it's the Progressive mantra, repeated by UVM's Middlebury College's Eric Davis, that Pollina would have a better shot against Douglas than an Democrat would. Their reasoning is based entirely on Pollina's performance in the 2002 Lieutenant Governor's race, where he performed better than Democratic rival Peter Shumlin in 2 of 3 Northeast Kingdom counties, as well as in Lamoille County (he also outperformed Shumlin in his home County of Washington, but that doesn't capture the spirit of Progressive romanticism the way his showing in the notoriously Republican Northeast Kingdom does). The argument is that this NEK showing demonstrates that Pollina has an ability to peel off enough Republican voters that would never vote for a Democrat, to defeat Douglas.

 

While the numbers are compelling, and do tend to demonstrate that Pollina has the potential to be a competitive candidate, the numbers simply do not support the sweepingly optimistic conclusions arrived at by Professor Davis and the Progressives.

 

Let's take a look.

 

Here are the percentages in the 2002 Lt Gov race among the major candidates:

 

 

Pollina comes in third in Essex County, but for sake of argument, let's look at the idealized Progressive demo models only; Lamoille, Caledonia and Orleans. In this way, we're looking at the best case numbers to back up the Progs' claim. Here are the combined actual numbers:

 

 

Presumably, Davis and the Progs would point us to the same year's totals for Douglas as a baseline comparison:

 

 

In this image, the combined anti-Douglas vote in these three counties is 13252. Compare that to the combined vote of Shumlin and Pollina against Dubie, where you get a vote total of 14770. That difference of 1518, argue Progs, are Republicans and Independents voting for Pollina who would never vote for a Dem. Compare that number against Douglas's 14089 in a head-to-head comparison, and the difference is a net 681 in favor of Pollina.

 

To assume this equals a Pollina victor is obviously to assume that no more than 680 Democrats vote for another candidate (that's about 2.8%). Sketchy, that.

 

But if the suggestion is that these numbers will all be at the expense of Douglas votes, and not simply additional anti-Douglas votes, the slim margin of victory gets a bit bigger. Just how much, however, is impossible to quantify. That puts us into the land of “gut feeling”, especially given that Hogan was in the race. Mathematically and intuitively, it's likely that no more than a negligible amount came from Douglas's totals, which makes this a dicey calculus.

 

In fact, if you look at Democratic towns like Montpelier and examine how consistent the Dem statewide candidates performed, with the exception of Racine, who showed a deficit almost precisely equal to the vote totals generated by Hogan, it seems highly unlikely that Pollina pulled too many votes from the population that could cleanly be considered Douglas's at all. Those were probably Hogan voters. Specifically characterizing the Hogan voter, though, is likely a quixotic task, and if Pollina can bring them back in the fold, that's a strong argument on his behalf.

 

The “peel off the republican vote” theory continues to break down if you look elsewhere. The argument put forward by proponents is that, if Pollina can take Republican-types in the NEK, he can do it elsewhere in the state. Well – the problem with such a statement is clear: he also ran in the rest of the state in 2002, and we have those results. What do they look like, and what happens if we apply the same logic? 

 

The other statewide Republican strongholds are Bennington and Rutland Counties, where Pollina came in third. Here's the breakdown:

 

 

 

 

Sure, Pollina came in third, but note that the combination of Shumlin and Pollina are, again, greater than 50%. Here are the comparitive gubernatorial numbers.

 

 

 

Assuming the Dems all were to hold with Pollina, that is an increase over Douglas's numbers 18484 vs. 18323 (a 161 vote difference). In these counties, 2172 more voters appear in the top three ballots for Lt Gov than Gov, in this case reinforcing the Progs frequent argument that Pollina can bring in more first time, or returning voters who abandoned the process, but the numbers also work against the suggestion that the net addition of Pollina's voters with Shumlin's would come at the expense of Douglas in a Pollina vs. Douglas head-to-head. Arguably some would. Likely most would not.

 

So the other part of Pollina's backers' argument is that these numbers don't just show him as competitive in GOP strongholds, they clearly indicate he would run better in Republican areas than any potential Democratic candidate. To address that argument, let's look at how Matt Dunne did in Rutland and Bennington Counties in his head-to-head against Dubie last year.

 

Dunne brought in 12538 votes in the three combined counties of Orleans, Lamoille and Caledonia. That's not a significant amount more than Shumlin did, which adds a lot to the Progs' argument.

 

On the other hand, in the southern statewide GOP stronghold  of the combined Rutland and Bennington Counties, Dunne brought in 17107 votes, nearly 5000 votes more than Shumlin, and under 4% off of  the 18484 combination of Pollina and Shumlin.

 

What does this data mean? It makes a lot of suggestions, but few conclusions. If one assumes that all the Dem votes belong to Pollina in lieu of a Dem candidate, Pollina does look stronger in these Republican areas – although negligibly so in the south, where the limited differential is due to his ability to bring in new voters, rather than his ability to pull GOP and Independent voters. In the north, his advantage is larger, and the reason for it is more likel due to an appeal to the Hogan voter, potentially tying at least some of this phenomenon specifically to the peculiarities of 2002. In any event, the fact that this didn't translate elsewhere in the state's GOP stronghold's suggests this is more of a geographic appeal than a demographic one.

 

But that big “if” we assumed at the outset of the paragraph is a true leap of faith. As we all know painfully well, lots of weeniecrats vote for Douglas, and many of them simply will not vote for Pollina – ever. It would take polling to figure out what those numbers are, but they will likely be concentrated in these more conservative regions, simply as a reflection of the local culture. Where Pollina does batter with Republicans, there could easily be a correspondingly high drop in his votes among self-identifying Democrats or moderates, so the rosy assumptions that the Progressive model is based on is simply not likely to be based in reality.

 

So, it's a purely faith-based statement to suggest that the numbers show that Pollina would defeat Douglas in a one-to-one in conservative areas.

 

But one is on solid ground saying that he could well be quite competitive – certainly in the NEK.

 

Which brings us to the other challenge.

 

Here's the first chart showing the percentages by county in the '02 race:

 

 

 

Looks good, eh?

 

Now here are the actual numbers:

 

 

 

Even under the rosiest scenarios, those counties just don't have enough people to put you over the top. That's why Shumlin did more than 10 points better than Pollina statewide.

 

So where does Pollina find the numbers to win?

 

Here's where a Pollina victory could come from.

 

Maximizing Democratic Votes:

 

First of all, he is absolutely correct to assume that he needs to be a dual party, “P/D” candidate. It's an indispensible way to staunch as much hemorrhaging from the Democratic center (and even plenty from the left, given the years of bad blood) as possible. The problem here is that you can only run on one primary ballot. By all accounts, Pollina will run on the Prog ballot and expect to be written in for a Dem primary.

 

He's not gonna like it, but if he's serious about winning, he needs to turn that around. He owns the P ballot, but nothing less than a full-on engagement with Democratic Primary voters will convince enough of them that he's sincere about burying the hatchet. In fact, less than that will send an ugly counter-message: that he feels entitled to Democratic Primary votes – so much so that he feels he shouldn't get his hands dirty asking for them. In fact, that message is already getting transmitted more than a little bit, as Democratic activists are still getting word of his plans by reading the papers, instead of by hearing from Pollina himself. Continuing to work through proxies such as David Zuckerman and Martha Abbott is no longer going to cut it, and feeds the sense that the same old sense of superiority is still in play.

 

In a nutshell, to maximize the Dem vote, he's going to have to start treating Dems the same way he treats members of his own party.

 

Keep on doing what you're doing in Republican areas:

 

Clearly, he's competitive in the NEK and the GOP south, in contrast to what many of us would expect. He can't lose any of that, and Douglas's positives are still extremely high. If he can continue to generate new voters, peel off a few in the north, and hold onto 80% of the Dem vote, he'll be well positioned to hold his own, if not break through.

 

Make it a ground game:

 

The very strong new voter totals generated by the Pollina crowd in '02 show that they get this, and they'll need those skills to eke out a victory. They need to question the orthodoxy of such field campaigns and do some outside-the-box thinking – including hitting the ground in a comprehensive way as early as possible.  The lack of a meaningful campaign finance regime makes that possible, as a challenger will be able to raise a LOT of money from people who would like to see Douglas retired. The $100,000-by-January number cited by Chris Pearson as a precondition for a formal entry into the race is high, but not crazy, given the current rulebook. That money should go into a serious field operation as soon as possible.

 

Mine the hell out of the interstate corridor:

 

As good as some of the numbers look for Pollina, there'll be no magic bullet or secret, working-class-hero Prog magic that will win this for him. He is going to have to maximize the left and shallow left vote in the state's most populous areas – particularly in the counties where Shumlin outperformed him; Chittenden and Windham. He was neck and neck with Shumlin in Orange, and will likely lose some ground there, as well as in Windsor. 

 

Windham, however, will open up for him without a native son in play, and he needs to mine the hell out of them for votes to offset drops elsewhere.

 

Chittenden, of course, is where all the votes are – it's also a fickle, and frequently surprisingly conservative place. Without a Dem in play, he'll be able to bump up his very strong numbers in Washington, and possibly use the Washington dynamic to convince dubious Dems in Chittenden to play ball.

 

The other two counties present unique challenges. Addison he'll take, but not as well as he should against Middlebury resident Douglas. Franklin he loses – as its unlikely that the NEK dynamic will break down the dynastic, conservative politics in play.

 

Messaging:

 

Pollina is well-positioned to play the outsider, running against both Douglas and the legislature. Whoever the opponent is will have to take this tack, but Pollina can do it convincingly. He can also offset much of the lack of political experience by packaging his Vermont Milk Company adventure as business/executive experience.

 

He's going to have to be VERY careful on the issues, though. It won't take much for many on the Democratic left to be reminded of the politically dodgy Pollina who has been aggravatingly coy about issues near and dear to leftists, while at the same time historically excoriating those leftists when they identify as Democrats. It won't take much to remind wary left-wing Dems of the way he avoided issues such as the Iraq War and Civil Unions when he thought it would play well with the conservative NEK crowd he's so eagerly courted. Environmentalists too, will be watching him closely. He's had enough sketchiness on environmental issues (such as the new creemee making machines with their disposable components that he has been promoting) that some will be prepared to be tossed aside for political expediency – something only enviros who consider themselves first and foremost to be Progs will put up with.

 

Vulnerabilities:

 

“Out of the mainstream.” “Radical.” “Bad for business.” These are no brainers. Expect Douglas to get nasty, though, as he can't help himself on that front, even when he's way out in front. Integrity will be the target, and it will start off predicated on the campaign finance/public funding debacle when Pollina trashed his own law after running afoul of it. I guarantee you, Roper already has already run through that ad in his mind about a hundred times by this time.

 

 

Thus concludes round one. Thankfully, the next three in the series will be a lot lighter on the facts, figures and charts – and by extension analysis.

 

Tomorrow, we'll try Galbraith…

Troops in Iraq: Wrong Questions Wrong Answers

Voters and the media continue to ask the presidential candidates to state whether troops will remain in Iraq should they be elected.  The candidates are also being queried about the troop level that might remain as part of other military and foreign policy objectives.

Some answers are better than others.  However, in addition to the answers so far, the question: “will there be troops in Iraq [1, 2, 4 etc.] years into your presidency?” also misses the mark.

What the candidates have not yet said, below . . . 

A gold star round of applause for the first candidate to shove the “will you keep troops” question back down Timmah Stephnopolarkeys Softballs-Matthews Blitzer's throat and who says: 

As you know Wolf, it is not up to the President to make that decision, you need to ask Congress since the Constitution vests the power and authority to authorize the deployment of forces exclusively with the legislative branch.

“There is a false underlying assumption in the question that a President, alone, decides whether to place troops in a foreign nation.

“My agenda will be to bring the troops home immediately. I recognize that the U.S. war on Iraq and occupation is the biggest foreign policy disaster in our country's history.

“Recognize the situation one of us will inherit.  George Bush is the first President to return to a war the U.S. already won and then lose it.  The only way the U.S. can and should remove the cloud of shame of the loss of an illegal Republican war of aggression in the Middle East is for the entire nation to commit to rebuilding Iraq – NOT occupying it. 

“Whether troops remain in Iraq is NOT, ultimately, the President's decision. Rather, continuing an occupation force or committing war on a non-threatening nation will ONLY depend and it will REQUIRE — at a minimum — the following:

1. The sovereign nation of Iraqi gives permission for U.S. troops to be stationed in their country;

2. The Congress expressly authorizes them to be there; and

3. There is a strategic need to keep them there.

I do not foresee any of those three criterions being in place and I cannot imagine all three criteria ever compelling the imposition of U.S. force on a non-threatening nation. 

* * * * *  Extra Credit Answer for candidates Biden, Clinton, Dodd and Obama * * * * *

Responding to the questions about long-term troop deployment, war and occupation, compels an additional answer from the four members of the U.S. Senate who are running. Biden Clinton Dodd Obama (BCDO Inc.) need to convincingly advocate this answer as well:

 

“Wolfie, I must emphasize to you and the rest of your panel of Thorazine-fed-GOP-compliant-media-whores, that the U.S. Senate can and has an obligation to end Mister Bush's ability to continue the U.S. war on Iraq.”

“By developing a 'Senate Global Peace & Security Caucus' of 41 or more of my colleagues under my leadership, this war will end because we can absolutely halt any funds and authorization to continue waging this illegal Republican led foreign policy failure.  In addition to the four of us standing here running for president, we only need 37 of our colleagues to stand with us against any further appropriations to fund the illegal U.S. war on the Iraqi people.

“As candidates for President, we have a special responsibility as spokes(wo)men for our party to lead the effort in the Senate to build and hold together the Peace & Security caucus. That is why you will see the four of us proving our leadership ability to the American people by using the power of our offices and the constitutional power Congress has to end the war. 

It is not enough to talk about the “leadership” any us will bring to the White House.  Instead, voters expect – and I commit to proving my ability to lead – a mere 37 of my Senate colleagues to do exactly what the overwhelming majority of Americans want congress to do and want us to do.  End.The.US.WAR.On.Iraq.

     *    *    *

At this point in the primary campaign and with an Iraqi occupation sapping the U.S. of its security and standing in the world, I really do not give a rat's ass about BCDO Inc's claims about troop plans for 2009.  Talk is cheap, especially in primary campaign and especially when BCDO Inc are only promising what all of us already want. Who really cares what proposals BCDO Inc are putting forth for 2009-2013 when the ONLY relevant question is: who is taking the leading role in the Senate, today, to end the war.

I respect the fact that we need more (& better!) Democrats in Congress.  However, the “we need 2/3 of the Senate to override a veto” (or similar) arguments from BCDO Inc., ring of defeatism. These expedient rationals also minimize and ignore the (dusty) tools these leaders have at their disposal.  It also allows BCDO Inc. to skirt scrutiny of their real life leadership ability and it shifts the focus to the hypothetical “what I will prefer to do if I can” future leadership intentions.

The best test of Biden, Clinton, Dodd or Obama's leadership is how well they lead the Senators they have — not the Senators they want — into battle.  They already have public support and the constitutional home-court advantage should they choose to use it. So BCDO Inc., if you want me to take your candidacies seriously:

— take your positions as U.S. Senators seriously;

— be honest about the tools you have at hand right now; and

— stop whining about the saw and screwdriver you do not have when you are not bothering to use the hammer and shovel already collecting dust in your tool shed.

If our party's leaders, especially Sens. Clinton and Obama, want to concede the congressional battle, that undercuts the remaining members of the Democratic caucus. It also creates a narrative of inevitability that lets Republican members of Congress off the hook.

How many times do we need to hear these questions before we hear the correct answers from our party's leaders?

*    *    *

“Thanks for asking, Wolf.”

“Next question?”

Kucinich On Energy And The Environment

We have to recognize the relationship between global warming and “global warring”. Just as dependence on foreign oil has led to wars in the Middle East, allocating an outrageous amount of our budget to the Pentagon facilitates and preserves this dependence on foreign oil. Dennis Kucinich understands this connection and so, as stated above, will slash the Pentagon budget by 15% as his first step to move away from fossil fuels and towards sustainable and renewable fuels and energy sources. This money will go to education as well as creating his Works Green Administration (WGA). The WGA will couple the EPA with NASA to develop new technologies to utilize alternative fuels and energies.

Inspired by FDR's Works Progress Administration, the WGA utilizes the Environmental Protection Agency to put millions of Americans back to work rebuilding our schools, bridges, roads, ports, water systems, and environmental systems. Not only does the bold practicality of the plan lie in putting Americans back to work by investing in the national wealth of our own infrastructure, but the plan also incorporates environmental and energy concerns to further create wealth for the country and save individual families more money. For example, not only will the public works projects stress green building and renewable energy technology, but the plan will enable homes to be retrofit with green building, solar and wind microtechnology which will save families money on their energy bills. The WGA rebuilding effort will incorporate sustainable development and renewable energy from our public infrastructure to the millions of private homes that choose to retrofit with wind and solar technologies to save on family energy costs. In fact, they will be able to sell energy back to the grid.

The role of utilities will change dramatically because it will no longer be a centralized approach toward energy production. Utility companies will have to provide support for green alternatives. They will no longer be dictating energy costs, as Kucinich will work to break up the monopolies and ensure close regulation of their activities. They will be required to go green as license conditions and shut down if they violate the Clean Air Act. We will finally have a strict and EPA.

Further, Kucinich will finally committ the U.S. to the provisions of the Kyoto Protocol, as well as incorporating a carbon tax to create disincentives for using carbon-based energies. However, he believes this isn’t enough; simply punishing those people who are using carbons is not the answer. Rather, Kucinich wants to put the emphasis first on the government supporting renewable technologies, to move the country toward a renewable portfolio standard of at least 30% by 2020.

Kucinich will create a cooperative and synergistic relationship between all departments and administrations within the government for the purpose of greening America. Whether it's the Small Business Administration, or the Housing and Urban Development Department, or the Department of Agriculture, or the Department of Labor, each would incorporate green goals into its policies.

Internationally, as President, Kucinich will work with the leaders of China and India and other nations to promote an environmental consciousness and sustainable economies. After withdrawing from NAFTA, the new trade agreements will include requirements for protecting the air and the water and the land of all the countries we do business with.

Dennis Kucinich has a long history and strong committment of fighting for the environment. He was active in helping draft the first environmental law protecting the air, as a member of the Cleveland City Council 30 years ago and led the effort in Ohio challenging nuclear power as being unsafe, unreliable, and unsustainable. Internationally he attended the World Summit on Sustainable Development in Johannesburg, advocating a plan with Mikhail Gorbachev for a Global Green Deal that would enable the introduction of $50 billion of new solar projects around the world.

Support Dennis Kucinich and make America a leader in protecting our environment and creating a sustainable future.

Live Blogging from Dartmouth Impeachment

I'm sitting in Filene Auditorium at Dartmouth, waiting for the festivities to begin.  The Impeach Bush & Cheney banner has been hung, and the room is rumbling with the sound of excited people.

Dan DeWalt, Adrienne Kinne, and John Nichols have arrived. The Kucinch folks are everywhere. Tim Carpenter of Progressive Democrats of America is handing out stickers and flyers. 

I'll try to keep up with the speakers and will likely do multiple updates over the evening, so I won't lose everything if the connection drops. 

All the meat will appear in the extended text.

(Note: will fix typos later)

TV Crews have set up in the back of the room, the space is nearly full and people are still filing in. THe fun starts in just a couple of minutes.

I’ll see if I can get a couple of pictures to post later.

ALL OF THE FOLLOWING IS PARAPHRASED. I can’t type that fast.

Dan’s opening remarks:
Northeast Impeachment Coalition, PDA, Women Making a Difference, Code Pink, After Downing Street are sponsors for tonight.

Dartmouth College maintains non-partisan stance and does not co-sponsor events.

Will present what’s happening in NE now, then onto featured speakers. Livestreaming courtesy of Kucinich.

Founded in July 07, as result of groups throughout NE. Has grown quickly. NJ, NY, and even places not in the Northeast. Bring back constitutional rule is going to be the role of the citizen, since congress has decided not to do its duty. If we have candidates in office who will not stand up and defend the constitution, we’ll have to run our own people against them.  Introduced CT and ME candidates.  Stated that there will be a candidate against Peter Welch.

John K., Maine Lawyers for Democracy. Founded in 2005 to protect civil rights and civil liberties. Detailed position paper on web. Covers impeachment in its historical context.
(and )Maine Campaign to impeach
Collect sigs around Maine to demonstrate that Mainers are serious about impeachment – 15,000 sigs. Used as springboard to get legitimacy with congresspeople and decision-makers.  Sept 25 & 26 people went to Cong offices. Mike M. is deliberating, voted against tabling Kucinich bill.

Days of Nixon were the last time. Oct. 1973, 28% of Americans said Nixon should be impeached and removed, after full summer of Watergate hearings. Rose to 55% the day before he resigned. After all the investigations and hearings, that was the high water mark.

Let’s look at today. First 64% say Pres has abused is power. 55% say Pres has committed impeachable offenses. Of those 55%, MANY GO FURTHER AND say he should be removed from office right not.

We have in this country people having the wisdom that our congress and media do not have right now. We have people who have the wisdom to recognize what’s going on, even before hearings and media coverage. It’s time to join the people in supporting impeachment.

John Nuremberg is introduced to a standing ovation.

Betty Hall, NH House of Reps:
I was in the house back in the 70’s. We had a legislator who introduced one of the 1st impeachment resolutions in a state legislature. Introduced it, gave a fiery speech, got exactly 11  votes. i was not one of those votes. I have regretted that every day of my life since. I’m not going to wait to next fal, I decided to introduce last Spring. I spoke to the rules committee, made my case, they voted not to let me introduce the resolution. I asked for a suspension of the rules and did it anyway. I got 40 votes. But it’s not enough. We need to learn and understand about impeachment. I didn’t have an inkling of it during the Nixon vote. We need to have more of this kind of meeting, to learn throughout the state, and maybe a teach-in for the NH legislature.

In any case, it will come to the legislature in January. I hope you all come to the public hearings and make sure the leg understands impeachment before they have to vote on it.

Q: Do you need co-sponsors?
Betty: It’s too late for it. But please talk to your legislators.

Tim Carpenter, President of PDA:
There’s no president at PDA, a citizen lobby group.

We were founded the last day the Democrats met when they nominated John Kerry. We believed at the end of the convention that 80% of those who believed we should end the war and redeploy our troops, never got the vote we wanted.
Grassroots democrats could organize around the country to repeal patriot act, end the war, fair & transparent elections. It’s our belief that grassroots activists can make the change.

When the Democrats were the minority, John C. held hearings in the basement of the House, began hearings in Washington on Oversight and Accountability that we believed would lead to impeachment. We believe in working with legislators on the inside and grassroots democrats like Dan D. Many of us were excited when the democrats won. We did not get a majority of progressive democrats, we got democrats who still need to hear from the grassroots.

We’re here tonight to ask you to continue to support the members of Congress who work for impeachment.

 

Be visible about your support of impeachment. Wear buttons, use bumper stickers, slip your dinner guests “impeach mints.”

We need to challenge incumbents!

Dann D:
Last swpring we did a tour with John Nichols, Cindy Sheehan, and 3 veterans. Adrienne Kinne is now seeing another side of war at the VA.

Adrienne:
I am here because I am a veteran, was active 1994 – 1998, was an interpreter. Things drastically and dramatically changed for the worst. Never would we have considered spying on an American citizen. Never. I remember an American’s name showed up, and we removed every single trace.

After 9/11, everything changed. We were intercepting phone communications from a whole swath. In the beginning it made sense, as we were learning the new equipment. Suddenly we started noticing that these were American citizens, just ordinary citizens: red cross, journalists, aid organizations. You started to question why we were doing this. We were told we were given permission to listen to Americans “just in case.” The constitution and our constitutional rights should not be waived “just in case.”  Not just comms in the middle east, but also their conversations home. Just kind of forget what the people in the United states had to say, report on the part that originates in the Middle East. They had waived law in the US to make this legal.

I came to realize the significance of our oath to protect the constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, when going into the service and what it means. IVAW has grown tremendously over the last 10 months – more than tripled our members.

The fact that Congress does not want to listen to the people does not absolve us of our duty to protect the constitution.

Raids on houses, abducting Iraqis at any time for no reason, killing people driving up to checkpoints. This happens not because of indiv soldiers, but because these are policies our government has forced upon our soldiers.

Dan:
This war will not end under this President.
Mayor Kucinich was plowing the airport because it was the only way to get the job done. I’m really honored to be able to introduce you to the one person in Congress who has supported the constitution, has stood tall above all others.

Denis Kucinich:
Thank you for your commitment to the principles of democratic government. The very idea that prayer for gov of by and for the poeple is for each generation.

When I read the declaration of independence. I am struck by founders who pledged their unity. We understand that it is all oon the line today. Our very demoracy is in danger.  As a member of congress I have seen this systematic destruction of our democratic principles. you can look at the bill of rights, you can see chapter and verse destruction. Giving the gov right to reach deeply into people’s personal lives. This fear of personhood, privacy, which is essential to ensure each of us is free of government intrusion.

You find that Home Grown Terrorism act, only 6 voted against. Once again I voted against it because I read it. 1603 of Defense bill broke down the Posse Commitatus act. We are at a moment in time when we realize that our democracy is on the line.

Why after introducing 333 in April did I find it nec. to come forward with 799 a coupld of weeks ago. What changed?

no hearing son 333, despite growing approval of on the bill. Submitted as priv resolution. Defense budget calls for spending 10 mil to retrofit B2 stealth bombers to carry 30k bombs (massive ordinance penetrators). Analysts all said will be used to drop on nuke research labs in Iran. Tremendous energy release, high up into the atmosphere, radioactive fallout, thousands of miles across the continent.

I had no choice by to bring this through under privileged resolution. Resonated with art 3 of 333 and VP beting drums of war against Iran.

Impeachment is the one remedy for this administration to stay the trip down the warpath. By taking it off the table, they (democratic leadership) are licensing the violation of the constitution and international law by pres and VP.  Neither leadership nor any other member of congress has the right to not do their constitutional duty.

When I hear: “We have more important things to do.”
I say “What?”
I hear “They’ll be gone in 14 months.”
I say: “They can do a lot of damage in that time. It doesn’t take long to attack a country that has no capacity to attack us.”

Each one of us has the responsibility and the honor to restore our nation.

John Nichols:
I don’t know what unnatural quirk of the planetary order has occured that would have me speaking after someone who should be the pres of the united states, but I will take it as an illustration of our democratic principles in this country that the president is second only to a citizen.

There are so many friends and comrades allies in this audience.

None of this happens without Dan DeWalt.

Liza Earle is a baker and day care provider, she had never gone to town meeting before. Came to some of our events, rustled up the courage to go to her town meeting to submit articles of impeachment

When we toured VT we thought New Englanders might not want to listen to out-of-staters, we suggested tht they should. This country would be tremendouasly well served to have aknowing and caring veteran to represent us in the Congress.

One of the other vets was Matt Howard.
Recently Matt went to Australia. The pres was there as well. Pres had gone to thank John Howard who was the Prime Minister of the time. He turned to prime minister and said “Thank you for sending the Austrian troops to Iraq.”

John Haward has been thrown out.

Matt told story of his service in Iraq. they went out of Kuwait city, after 1/2 hr of training. A young marine jumped out, raised his arm with a fist to say halt. Car stopped, father with children wife, relatives. Gave sign of solidarity (raised arm clenched fist. Pulled forward. Marines shot everyone in the car. Soldiers slept in the truck that night. Stirred in his sleep screaming. Matt said, “It’s ok, bad things happen in a war.”
Bad things don’t happen in a war, bad things happen when you send them unprepared, untrained.

120 soldiers a week now commit suicide.

When I hear stories like that, I despair.

When I hear our presendent speak and talk of more surge.

When I hear V{P casually discuss launching a more dangerous and deadly war against the more powerful and connected state of Iran.

When I see congress fail to uphold the end of the war.

When I see people come out from across New England in a rainy night. I realize I do not have the privilege.

Courage patriots, the rep is in danger, const is under attack, democracy itself undermined. We are teh descendants of those who fought a revolution against a king named George.

I say to you my name is JohnNichols and I want to impeach the pres and vp of US.

I want to impach for their attack on this cost of US. When they shred the const, undermine separation of powers. When they lied to congress,
because
they have spied on the american people.
because the const of the us gives us freedom in our homes from intervention

because they have sanctioned torture and extaord rendition.

Geneva conventions, but we don’t have to go to the gc, we have only to go to the 8th amendment.  When cheny authorizes, he commits and impeachable offense.

because what did to Wilson and Plame.
3rd article was for use of office to punish political foes.

When they used their office to punish Joe Wilson for speaking out, they committed impeachable offense.

I didn’t come up with these ideas myself. I read the notes to the const convention.

George Mason, author, wrote: No instrument in this document is more important than the power to impeach, for if we cede our power to impeach, we cede the ability to hold the president accountable. If we do not have power to impeach, we make him a king for 4 years.

Jefferson: without impeachment, we have a monarch for 4 years, with no difference between him and a king.

Oh, but it is a time of war, we must support the troops. We do support the troops. But keep in mind, Mason said: War is the true wet nurse of executive aggrandizement, to empty the treasury of resources …, destroy even the freedoms that the war was supposedly launched to defend.

Wars waged illegally and immorally are the highest of high crimes.

****This is a quote I need to get from prepared text. Very compelling, but couldn’t keep up.***

James K. Polk started the Mexican American war, claiming an attack by Mexico on America. A young congressman was elected from the Midwest, and went to Washington. He offended party the leaders.
He said from the well to the President: Show me the spot on which a single Mexican shed a single drop of American blood. If you cannot, then show me why you should not be removed from your office. When Polk did not do answer, congress censured James K Polk, we honor the troops but not the one who sent them to an immoral war.

You cannot attack the pres in a time of war. Cong replied: allow pres to invade a nation when he claims to see a potential for an attack, if you can fix any limit to his power in this respect, 

[need to get the rest of this quote….]

I was not elected to serve a king.

Abraham Lincoln.

Q: How do we change the mind of Peter Welch?
A (Kucinich): The people of Vermont can do that. Continue to talk to him.
A (Nichols): The force you use on this issue IS having an impact. The media will not tell you that.

Q: Why off the table?
A (Kucinich): it seems that the political calculus is that the more offenses pile up on this administration, the more republican loyalty will be brought to a lower and lower level.  I think it’s a cold calculating attempt in the way the democrats put ads on tv then turned around to fund the war.

Duplicity the word that was made for this moment.  The word duplicity has found its hour. We cannot permit this to count as governance.

It’s just incompetence.

Q: Welch voted for 1955:
In response: “The law doesn’t criminalize any activity.”
A: Trying to criminlaize thought.
Break down thought, word, deed, free speech. When you start to criminalize thought.

How did 400 congressman, after they read that bill pass it?

A: People don’t read these bills. You get a dozen bills, some a few pages, some a hundred. Comes from your side, and vote for it. It was a democrat’s bill – Jane Harmon’s bill. They don’t read the bill, they look at the title.

This is what we’re faced with.

You see gymnastics that are olympian, but pathetic in their implications.

A: Most of the pathologies in the patriot act. It was much harder to vote against the patriot act.

You now hear Chris Dodd talking about how much he loves the constitution. Then why didn’t he love it enough to vote against the patriot act. It mattered at the time when the votes happened.

Q: (missed this one)

Q: Many speakers have given reasons to impeach. We need to start thinking about them as the steps a government takes … towards dictatorship. It’s abd enough our pres tortures people. Once it starts moving from people in other countries, it’s going to creep toward us. Once that happens, nobody is going to stand up when people start being afraid of being tortured. We are the ones who are the victims, because our rights are at stake. It is to stop the next war, the current war, and preserve our constitution. We have to work so hard to build the movement, so we don’t go further down this path toward dictatorship (not a questin)


Q: Republicans were going to vote against tabling to embarass democrats. I was very confused. Looked into it. What could be embarrassing baout that?  When you investigate Cheney the people who should be embarrassed about it would be the republicans. I looked into it and came up with PACs, the big pacs are oil & gas. Wanted to expose the democrats as listening to the PACs that fund them instead of listening to the people, and embarrass the democrats in the eyes of their constituents.

I am not going to be afraid to be called a name for telling the democratic leadership to stop listening to the PACs, and start listening to us.

A: We are facing a culture of intimidation – torture, wire tapping to deprive people of civiol rights and liberties to make us apprehensive about speaking out for the constitution, civil liberties and this country. We don’t have the luxury of despair or of being intimidated.

A: In interviewed Bernstein: no question they should be impeached. Different now, the Congress is dramatically more bought than in the 1970s. But more serious is our media. Media is invested in power. On bendend knee media that does the work of the powerful. Reinforces those in power. They’ve played the media brilliantly.

Believe me, amazing things are happening.

The only thing that worries me, is our media.  We can roll over Congress. Our media is in a crisis media.

I don’t hear candidates talk about media reform.

It’s not just Fox and Murdoch and CBS and NBC. Recently I (Dan) spoke with public media head (alan ?). Let’s have a program about it.

No, it’s not an issue.

A: (Tim:) Visit AfterDowningStreet.org
Invite people like John N., David Swanson, and others to meetings like this. Begin those kitchen table conversations.

Ask you congress member to call for hearings in judiciary on HRes 333.

Q: Had an epiphany, had copies of sample resolution for impeachment. Fill in your town’s name, go to your town, and put it in for town meeting. Talked with Secretary for town: warrants closed. Guess what, they weren’t.

You have to stay on it, want to have it happen. Before I went to the 1st places, I was afraid of what people would say. When I sat with 500 people, I knew our Republic wasa bout done. It’s a very simple concept – we were separating ourselves from the monarchies. We would not kneel to a king and be strung up for asking why.

  In a republic, you are the sovereign, I am the sovereign. We don’t get down on our knees. We shouldn’t feel that someone else is going to do this for us.


Q: On media and impeachment, when Dennis Kucinich filed HRes 333, there was a blackout. Begged for a lawsuit against media. Overwhelming evidence of 911 being fixed. John N., please look at this and start writing about and publishing.

Prince Bandar says he warned Bush.

Q: How do we impart the passion we feel to the young people at the universities?
A: Get this question on every issue. Young people make a realistic choice not to be engaged in the political process because they see nothing come of it. SOmething you can do: Stop being PUNDITS. Biggest disease going: electability, how to succeed, no idealism. Young people respond to idealism – a promise that something real can happen. The candidate that has touched most young people: Ron Paul. When he stared Giuliani down and said there are reasons this country was attacked and 9/11 occurred, and people, young peple were watching and said “yeah! you’re right.”

Voting your conscience, acting upon your conscience, and making real the idealistic options. Young people look at older folks and see older folks compromising. If we don’t hold up higher ideals, we won’t get young people to believe that this is a savable political process. You will find that young people will be what you want them to be if you are what they want you to be.

A: At ISO, There were kids responding to what our country has never been and should be.

When we have actions not governed by “What won’t offend anybody” but by what do we need to do, the kids like it and get engaged.  They’re not so afraid of offending someone for a decent cause. I don’t think we’re going to pull this off without more kids. We have a long way to go. We need to stop limiting ourselves.

Q: Believe we need to be calling on a higher power and invoke the martyrs (Kennedy, Wellstone, etc.) who have given their lives, and we must honor them, because they really are with us.

A: We will only succeed if we truly believe that we will succeed and move forward and believe that we will succeed.

Q: I am a confused citizen. In any movement it’s important to understand the position of those who do not support the position in order to get them to change their position. Our democratic legislators seem to be sitting on the sidelines. Can you comment on the rationale for the dems to not stand up.

A: Too much money and not enough courage. I don’t know why my colleagues don’t think the way I do. I  got arrested and put in jail because I didn’t move. They asked all the questions – did she do this or that wrong? Answer was no.

Q: What are they afraid of?
A: The smear machine that kicks in when you stand up. Also have to face possibility that they’re members of the same team, but wearing different coat.
A: I do a lot of right-wing talk radio shows willingly for sheer sport of talking to conservatives. I talk about impeachment. I thin it’s relevant to this. I know you believe GB is touched by God. I believe he’s been touched as well. I know you believe he’ll do the right thing, but do you really want to hand those powers over to president Hillary Clinton. I’m always amused by the reaction.

I am afraid both like power, and like it so much, they don’t enjoy a discussion about disempowering the president because they’re afraid that we’ll start discussing disempowering others, too.

Jefferson envisioned the president becoming corrupted, the congress becoming corrupted, and even the media becoming corrupted. It is for that reason we rested all power in the people.

You’re the leaders, you guys have to do it.

A: In my darker moments I wonder what they might be afraid of: wiretapping, Sr. members of Democratic party were briefed on wiretapping.

Won’t be able to elect a democratic president because they won’t have Bush to kick around anymore.

We can’t address it by focusing on fear, we must address it on protecting the constitution, and handing down to the next gen a country they can be proud of like was handed to us.

Q: The 120 soldiers committing suicide per week: do those include returned or in-field?
A: Returned. Not all Iraq vets, there’s a dramatic surge in suicide. It’s the reason the administration and VA at fed level are not keeping unified set of stats.

I’ve interviewed returning troops – you can pluck someone off the battlefield who would have died, but the tragedy is survival in horrific condition. Part is because of that, but part is the mental agony from war.

Every single day we don’t just doom someone to die, we doom hundreds of young men and women to a future in which suicide will be a logical option. I counsel urgency because there are young men who will be ruined today, tomorrow, and every day we go forward. And that doesn’t count the innocent Iraqis.

A: Twice as many Vietnam vets have killed selves as were killed in the war.

A: I have worked with vets on PTSD. It’s no PTSD, it’s having a conscience. When they are asked to commit war crimes and atrocities, when they come home and suffer guilt, then to be told that they have a disorder, there’s something wrong. It’s when you have leaders who send you to commit these atrocities – that’s the disorder. 

Q: (John who’s walking to Pelosi’s office) MarchInMyName.org, give me pictures of you and your family to bring to Nancy Pelosi.

Q: My brother committed suicide on my birthday 2 years ago. We are all one. The thoughts and feelings are energy that permeates all of existence. Everyone who has lost loved one can understand that. I want people to realize that this world is terrifying the sensitive souls which exist here. They don’t want to express it in front of others because it “shows weakness.” I’m a radio operator, my call letters: W1JSB. I get on 80 meters, 40 meters, 20 meters, to share with people.

Dan: Nancy (?) put this together.

Q: Tired of writing letters and emails to Congress. I think of other countries and when the get organized, they take to the streets. What’s it going to take for us to make a showing and be heard.

A: Original sin of this whole moment: when they were not going to count the votes in Florida. People went into the streets about that in other countries. We have another election coming and a horrible election coming up. We invite all the sins that flow from the moment they steal an election.

Q: to John Kaminsky
Parsed linear things (articles of impeachment). there must have been information on 9/11 – how were they discarded from the impeachment articles?
A: Didn’t know a lot about the questions til the last 3 – 4 months. I had been looking at so much other evidence and focused on putting together strong supportable case that took advantage of the evidence before us now.

We don’t have a lot of evidence in hanabout what really happened 9/11. My concern is a concern of urgency. We need to move forward now, with the case we have in our hands. I don’t mean to diminish the arguments on 9/11, I fear there would not be enough time during this administration’s time in office to accomplish a complete investigation of 9/11. I would hope next pres will appoint special prosecuter.

Q: Right of Revolution is in NH constitution (article 10) listed on back of tonight’s program. NH is the only state with the right of revolution.

Interview with Anthony Pollina

(Great interview. Makes for a nice lead-in to the huge Pollina diary I’ll have up tomorrow. – promoted by odum)

The following is an interview with likely candidate for governor, Progressive Anthony Pollina.  The interview is done by David Van Duesen of the tiny little Catamount Tavern News.

 

Interviewer:  You’ve been organizing the dairy farmers. Before that you where organizing with Rural Vermont, before that with the Northeast Organic Farmers’ Association [NOFA].

 

 Pollina:  In between with VPIRG. I worked with NOFA back in the late 70s-early 80s and then I founded Rural Vermont in 1985.  I went to work for [then Congressman-now Senator] Bernie Sanders back in 1990… and then I went to VPIRG in 1995 as the interim Executive Director.. [After that] I was the VPIRG Policy Director until 2000.  I [also] ran [as a Progressive for Governor] against Howard Dean. Since then I have started the Vermont Milk Company.   

 

 Interviewer:  You’ve been organizing around farmers’ issues since the late 70s.  What is it that draws you to that?

 

 Pollina:  Well there really is two things, and I don’t know which comes first.  One is the people quite frankly.  Farmers and people who are farming, [those who are] working the land, are just about the most genuine people you could work with. So I find myself drawn to that type of work because of the people I’ve come to know through it.  Other than that, the issues around agriculture and food bring together a lot of the issues that we all care about –you know economic justice, social justice, environmental justice.  They seem to come together in many ways around agriculture –or at least they have for me. I’ve worked on other issues too, obviously, but I find myself drawn back to work on agriculture and food issues.  If you’re talking about economic development, you’re talking about agriculture.  Environmental policy? Agriculture.  Worker exploitation?  Agriculture.  On the other hand, when you talk about the positive things that bring people together you’re also talking about agriculture. It’s ‘culture’ –that’s why its ‘agriculture’ because it is a lot about who we are as people. Whether its free trade, or local economic development there seems to be a piece in it that comes back around to working on those issues.   

 

 Interviewer: The Vermont Milk Company?  How is that coming along? 

 

 Pollina:  One of the most important things about the milk company is that it’s a business enterprise that is the direct result of a grassroots organizing effort that [local family] farmers undertook close to three years ago. Those farmers were looking for a way to regain control over their milk and their [rapidly falling] income.  They were looking for a way to take some milk out of the commodity market, add value to it, and put that money in their pockets.  They were also looking for a way for consumers to directly support them…

 

     We had a committee, which was primarily farmers, and traveled around the state and had a lot of meetings and talked to a lot of [other] farmers.  We then held meetings with the major milk handlers and talked about ways in which they could work directly with the farmers to help them through this and got nowhere! As we went through this process more and more the farmers said the only way to do this is to have our own brand –our own processing facility.  So it’s important to me that it came from that.

 

     We started the business about a year ago; ‘we’ meaning a group of farmers, myself and a few other non-farmers, and it is different than any other dairy business that I’m aware of. It has a fair trade mission…  It is Vermont owned and farmer controlled in the sense that the board of directors is dominated by farmers, and we’re committed to paying the farmers a stable minimum price.  Right now the price that is the minimum is $15 a hundred weight. Of course the price of milk is [currently] well over that so we match that higher price. But when the price goes down we have that floor that we won’t go below.

 

     Last year at this time the price of milk generally was eleven dollars, twelve perhaps:  we were paying $15… In the last couple weeks the price of milk was $23. What we do in that case is we match the market price.  We basically use [the] St. Albans [Co-op] as our benchmark…  BUT we also don’t charge the farmers’ for the trucking of the milk from the farm to the plant [in Hardwick], which other handlers or milk companies do.            

 

 Interviewer:  Can you tell me how much does the average farmer pay for ‘stop fees’ and ‘hauling fees?’

 

 Pollina: Not really, because they [the farmer] doesn’t even really know.  It’s a very complicated formula.  It varies a little from farm to farm…  I’ve herd it to be as low as thirty cents a hundred weight, and as much as seventy cents a hundred weight…  But lets say its fifty cents a hundred weight on average. [On top of that fifty cents the farmer] pays a ‘stop charge’ which is $7 to $9 every time the truck stops at their farm… That’s every day or every other day, as it depends on the farm. [In addition] right now they’re paying fuel surcharges, which of course [the farmer] can’t pass on to anybody. They [are compelled] to pay promotion fees that go into the federal and state promotion programs.  [Even more, while] it depends on the handler, I know that this year a number of them were paying extra assessments to help their companies overcome bad debt… So when you look in the newspaper and read that the price of milk is whatever, say $12, farmers are not getting $12.  Some of them are getting close to $10 [amounts which translate into the mass foreclosures of family farms]. The media doesn’t report the ‘net.’  They’re reporting what the federal government or market order says the price is. 

 

     So just to finish this thought: [the Vermont Milk Company] pays the farmers a fair price, we pay for the transportation, we keep the money here in Vermont, and we’re taking a commodity, milk, and we’re adding value to it.  So it’s a fair trade product. [and often with fair trade products] we talk about fair trade coffee, fair trade chocolate, fair trade crafts, [all imported goods]. What we want people to talk about more is domestic fair trade –Vermont fair trade. So that is what is so important about the [Vermont Milk] Company. 

 

     We make cheese, we make ice cream, we make yogurt, and like any start up there is a lot of challenges and we’ve just come to the end of our first year. We’re looking at the places where we made money and the places where we didn’t and we’re figuring out how to go forward. It has been extremely exciting and extremely challenging and extremely rewarding. And it has kept us very busy because there are a lot of moving parts.

 

     I frankly think that there are some folks out there in the industry that would rather we not succeed. I really do. We’re trying to create a model [that is] pretty similar, but a little different, than a worker owned [co-op]… And if we can make it work, and we will, I think it will be a model for [farmers] around Vermont as well as other places. 

 

 Interviewer:  In twenty years from now, do you see farmer controlled milk companies like this operating in several counties?

 

 Pollina:  I would say most likely… This has already come up.  People have said ‘can we do one in southern Vermont, can we do one in Chittiden County?’ The short answer is ‘sure’ –but it is quite complicated. Lets make sure this one [in Hardwick] becomes established so we really understand what it takes. We’ve really learned a lot in this process. Sometimes there’s talk about expanding the Hardwick location. Sometimes there’s talk of doing it somewhere else.  Right now we’re not ready to do either of those things, but both of them get thought about a lot. People come and visit the plant all the time and talk about that. I think there is potential…

 

     Interviewer: In general terms, what is the state of the farmer movement today in Vermont?

 

 Pollina:  In some ways it tends to follow milk prices up and down. Like any group of people, when times are tough they tend to motivate, and right now for what it’s worth the price of [raw] milk has been pretty good… On the other hand farmers lost so much money over the last year or two that even though the price of milk doubled, they are really struggling to catch up… They’re trying to deal now with the higher prices of corn and feed. 

 

    There has also been something else which has been going on, which we have been somewhat involved in but not as directly, which is a group of farmers [Dairy Farmers Working Together] that started in Vermont…which has been traveling around the country to try to see if they can get Congress to develop a supply management system… And those folks…went to California, they went to Wisconsin, they went to Washington…  [This] is good and something that we all have worked on a long time. So a lot of what’s been going on, and I don’t mean this negatively, has been that…a lot of attention has been turned towards Washington… But I think we do better by focusing on state and local policy because I guess I have a little more faith in [Vermonters] ability to change than I do with the federal [government]…

 

     The other thing which is happening which is interesting is this movement towards the development of a Vermont fair trade designation… There is growing evidence that people in the region…will pay a fair price for dairy products that are designated to be fair trade products. So we’re trying to figure out what that means and how to put it to people. It’s really like the early days of the organic movement when people were trying to figure out what the standards would be. So that’s what has been going on…

 

     The other people who have been really good for farmers in Vermont lately have been the public schools’ cafeteria workers. [They] have now become the frontline in supporting local agriculture.             

 

 Interviewer: Have they been buying local products?

 

 Pollina: Yes, they’ve been going out of their way to buy local.

 

 Interviewer: Is that having a big impact on small local farms?

 

 Pollina: It is, [but] its not big enough to solve the problem, but its big enough to set the example that if public schools can do this…maybe the big institutions in the state, the IBMs and the National Lifes can start figuring it out. I mean that if the cafeteria lady at the Holland Elementary School can find a way to buy local you would think that cooks at National Life would be able to do the same?   

 

 Interviewer: Does Vermont need its own state based subsidies program for family farms? Do we need a base price for farm commodities?

 

 Pollina: The wording is complicated. When you say a ‘subsidy’ I would say no, [but] if there was a way in setting a base price that farmers got through the market -in other words if St. Albans, and Agrimark, and Dairy Farmers of America (the organizations which control most of the milk in Vermont) simply said that we are going to pay farmers no less than $16 a hundred weight and were going to pass that on to consumers wherever they may be, that would be great, we’d be getting the marketplace to pay that price. That is what the organic companies do. They set a minimum price and that’s it… [But] these entities, the St. Albans and the Agrimark say they can’t do that. They say they don’t really control where the milk goes. It’s a legitimate discussion, [however] I don’t really believe that. They could play a strong role [advocating for the farmers]… I think it would be a good idea to do what we [The Vermont Milk Company] are doing. We’re saying were not going to pay less than $15 a hundred weight.   

 

 Interviewer: But can you rely on the free market to figure this out on its own?

 

 Pollina: No.

 

 Interviewer: Does the state have to be involved?

 

 Pollina: What we need to do is find ways [for the state] to invest in local processing, because if there is more local processing for dairy and other products…those processors will be able to put those products out in the market place with the minimum price attached to them. I think that would make a big difference.   

 

 Interviewer: So let me see if I’m following you. You contend that instead of the state taking a direct role in such a process [ie ownership], you advocate the state acting to economically support endeavors from groups like Dairy Farmers of Vermont?

 

 Pollina: Right, right. Basically there are things that the state could do immediately… The State of Vermont could actually commit to buying local products. You know Jim Douglas goes on the radio and runs these adds which say ‘buy local –its just that simple.’ Well if its just that simple, Jim, why aren’t you doing it? [And here] when we say ‘the state’ what I mean is the UVMs, the state colleges, the prisons, the public schools. But that could also extend to things like Fletcher Allen [hospital in Burlington] which receives public money.  If they all bought dairy from the Vermont Milk Company, it would be glorious. If they all decided that they were going to buy Vermont hamburger… well, what they would say is that ‘Vermont hamburger is not there.’ Well if you tell us you’re gonna buy it, we [the Vermont farmers] will bring you the hamburger.  We were talking about all this at a meeting I was at last night on a farm in Franklin County.

 

     So how do you build the infrastructure necessary to meet the demand of the state and other consumers? It means you need a place where you can keep frozen hamburger over the winter… So what the state can do is it could provide capital and equity to support those kinds of endeavors. The Governor says that ‘the state doesn’t do that’ but two years ago the [Vermont] legislator was close to appropriating half a million dollars to support in-state dairy processing… The Governor killed that bill. Literally the same week or so the [Democratic] legislator and [Republican] Governor gave half a million dollars to the Ski Areas’ Association to promote skiing in Vermont because they had a ‘tough’ winter. Well dairy farmers have had a tough life! The ski industry has had a tough last season.

 

 Interviewer: Most the Ski areas are owned by out-of-staters.

 

 Pollina: Well of course! They are owned by big corporations whether in state or out of state and they have resources. So they [the government] literally said ‘no’ to the agricultural infrastructure, and it was a half a million dollar appropriation…

 

 Interviewer: Less than a dollar a person for every Vermonter.

 

 Pollina: Yeah, and [instead] they gave it to the ski areas to advertise. The ski areas admitted a couple months later that they only spent half of it because the season ended, and they put the other half in the bank!

 

     So are there ways to raise capital, and to make that capital available to entrepreneurs, or groups of farmers or other Vermonters who want to build processing plants or have a place to freeze vegetables or have more meat processing? There are ways to do that.

 

 Interviewer: So where has Governor Douglas been in this big picture?

 

 Pollina: Absolutely nowhere, that’s the thing! Missing in in-action! He talks about it a little bit, but as far as I can tell there has been very little effort made to create an investment in infrastructure. [Even so] there have been a couple of small things that are underway [through the current government]. Although I haven’t seen it yet, somebody has set aside [resources] for a mobile slaughter house that could go around and slaughter poultry and other larger animals on the farm. [This] would make it easier for people to do that kind of stuff.

 

 Interviewer: Who would own or control the operation?

 

 Pollina: That right now is unclear to me… We have to find a way to invest at [a higher] level in Vermont. So there has been this talk about the mobile slaughter house, [the government] has given some grants to schools to buy local, but we’re really missing the boat. We should be talking about a plan, an agricultural development plan that would require some investment in this industry. The problem is when Jim Douglas hears the word investment he says ‘you want to raise my taxes.’ And that is not necessarily what I’m talking about. What I’m talking about is coming up with capital through a variety of ways. There is plenty of money in Vermont, the question is what are we doing with it?

 

 Interviewer: Well you hear Douglas say “higher taxes, higher taxes” what you don’t hear politicians talk about is whether your talking about taxing the average working person, or are you talking about taxing the [wealthy] Richard Tarrants of the state? For somebody who is engaged in politics, is there something to be lost for a person to say ‘hell yeah, we’re going to tax the Richard Tarrants and we are going to create a mobile slaughter house?

 

 Pollina:  First of all you don’t want to increase taxes on working Vermonters because they are the ones who are struggling. What they are struggling with though is not their taxes. What they are struggling with is their healthcare, energy costs, transportation, and housing. The Governor will tell you that taxes are the biggest problem working families have. He’s wrong. The biggest problems in terms of chunks of their family incomes is housing, healthcare, and energy. And food comes after that. Those are much more of a burden on families then taxes are. On the one hand you don’t want to raise their taxes, but on the other hand you want to reduce some of those other costs as well.

 

     There was a study which came out recently that said compared to the twelve other states that they looked at, Vermont had the fairest tax system of all. [This] means that we as Vermonters have done a very good job of being fair to working families when it comes to taxes. That is something Jim Douglas doesn’t tell people about.

 

    Having said that, I do believe there are ways to bring Vermonters together to talk about whether to make changes to our tax system [and to do so in a way that does] not burden working families. We can make changes in the way we tax capital gains in Vermont –that would bring in money. But I actually have a different idea to tell you the truth! When I think about capital, I look at institutions in Vermont who have a lot of wealth. The obvious ones…are UVM, Fletcher Allen, and the state colleges. They have portfolios, they make investments. They have endowments and that kind of stuff. [Vermont] has told them over the years ‘don’t invest in tobacco, don’t invest in Darfur.’ We have never told them to invest in Vermont. I think we could work with them or require them, depending on how it shakes out, to put a percentage of their endowment into an equity fund which would then be used to support rural entrepreneurs and others who would be able to then set up processing plants…distribution networks, whatever it takes. I think we could make that happen… They are [already] using our money! UVM is supported by us! Fletcher Allen uses medicade/medacare. They use public dollars. Why don’t they give a little back to the local public? We used to call it 2% for Vermont. [Why not tell them] to put 2% of their portfolios into this fund?… Then [after they did that] you ask other large businesses, private entities, to do it.  If National Life of Vermont put 2% of their investment portfolio into Vermont…rural development fund we would have all the resources we would need to invest… So again, I think there are ways in which we can change the discussion about what we mean by investment in Vermont, and that is part of what I would like to do.

 

     How about we have a Vermont credit card? Vermonters use their credit cards to buy their boots and to go out to dinner and its Visa and LL Bean even has their own credit card. Let’s face it. US Airways has a credit card. Everybody gets a cut and there is a lot of interest that is obviously gained from credit cards. Where is it going? Why don’t we sit down at the table and think about whether or not we could direct Vermont’s spending into Vermont more. I think Vermonters would like to have that conversation.

 

 Interviewer: You have recently been going around the state talking to people about many of these ideas, what are your goals in this endeavor?

 

 Pollina: Its about allowing Vermonters to have a vision and to move forward with it. I do think that in particular [living] under Jim Douglas has made it more difficult for us [common people] to talk about the challenges we face and the big issues and [for us] to try to find solutions. Jim Douglas has basically put creativity on hold when it comes to state government. He explains to us often what we cannot do; he tells us why we couldn’t buy those dams on the Connecticut River, why we couldn’t invest in the energy efficiency program, why we don’t have real healthcare reform, why we couldn’t invest in the agricultural infrastructure. He talks a lot about why we can’t do things. The first thing we have to do is get Vermonters to stop talking about what we cannot do, and actually start to talk about what we can do…

 

     Just recently there were some people getting together to talk about affordable housing. You know, sort of what you would call affordable housing advocates and activists sitting down with government agencies, and they [asked] ‘why isn’t the Governor here as part of this conversation?’ and the Governor’s people said ‘it’s not appropriate for him to sit down with special interest [groups].’ I’m sure he sits down with the Chamber of Commerce and other people! Its ridicules! My point is he is not engaged with talking to Vermonters about how we’re going to deal with the things we need to deal with.

 

     Part of it is getting people to change their frame of mind, getting them to feel optimistic about themselves again. Jim Douglas [on the other hand] tells us that ‘we are the most taxed state in the country’, which is not true if you’re a working Vermonter. He tells us business doesn’t want to be here. He tells us that young people don’t want to be here. He tells us we can’t afford to live here. You listen to Jim Douglas long enough and you want to leave! This is not the guy you want leading the way to creative solutions to solving problems… So I think part of it is getting people together to stat having the conversations…

 

     On the [energy] efficiency issue, that’s just a question of making it clear to Vermonters what that was about. [Douglas] at one point said expanding [the state’s] energy efficiency program beyond electricity was about taxes! He literally at one point was quoted saying ‘this is all about taxes.’ Somebody should tell the man he’s wrong! Somebody should stand there and say ‘this is not true.’ This is about saving businesses money, that’s what this is about; its about creating jobs, its about reducing energy costs, its about expanding a program that has already been identified as one of the best things Vermont has ever done! But he gets away with saying it’s just about taxes. So let’s talk about that.

 

     When you talk about healthcare reform what he talks about is [how] ‘we can’t raise taxes’ but we can spend a lot of public dollars on Catamount Health, for some reason that’s ok –we can spend tobacco money or little bits from pots of money from here and there, but we can’t sit down and really talk bout the fact that if [Vermont] publicly funded healthcare you would actually eliminate premiums! So in that case you may actually be talking about a tax, your talking about public financing of healthcare and where he would immediately run away from that I would say ‘well wait a minute.’ If I were gonna use public financing and you were going to pay no healthcare premium but your cost were going to go down would you like to at least talk about that? I think most Vermonters would at say ‘lets at least talk about that.’

 

     With energy I think we’re missing the boat. Vermont Yankee [Nuclear Power Plant in Vernon] is going to meltdown before we figure out how to replace that power. So we’re wasting time. It’s unfortunate, because we are running out of time when it comes to energy. With energy and healthcare you need to really change that whole conversation and talk to Vermonters about the reality. [Here] it does start with a reality check as related to taxes. Where [the Governor] tells us we’re the most taxed state in the nation. That’s just not true if you’re a working [class] Vermonter.

 

 Interviewer: Vermont currently receives one third of its energy needs from Vermont Yankee, another third from Hydro Quebec, and the rest from small local sources such as dams, wood burning plants, and some methane and wind. Can Vermont be energy self sufficient without the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plant?

 

 Pollina:  Can we be more energy independent? The answer is yes. [Unfortunately] we missed the boat in some degree [when the state] did not buy the dams on the Connecticut River and we’re going to live to regret that. [Even so] we could find Vermont scale wind power that people could relate to and support. [But] the best way to become energy independent is by using less energy. And that is what that energy efficiency program has done and could do more of. So are we ever going to be as energy independent as much as a lot of us would like to be? Probably not in our lifetimes unless we fund [the means] to make it happen. But can we become more energy independent? The answer is yes… Then the [other] big issue is cars. We have done nothing in Vermont for public transportation.

 

 Interviewer: I was recently in the Northeast Kingdom and I observed that they were tearing up miles of old railroad tracks. It seems like a further move away from that?

 

 Pollina: Well what the Governor wants to do, if he has his way, he would invest hundreds of millions of dollars in the Circ Highway to move people in a circle around Burlington. [This is] very indicative of the way Jim Douglas thinks about policy… The studies have shown that the Circ Highway is not going to reduce commuting time, it’s not going to create jobs [in] a healthy local economy, and it’s not really going to reduce accidents. I’m not even sure what the whole purpose if the Circ Highway is at this point, but Douglas still supports it. He thinks its something we really have to do. That’s a couple hundred million dollars that we could be investing in something else.

 

 Interviewer: Given the current make up of the Vermont General Assembly, [overwhelmingly Democrat with six Progressives], with the right person as Governor can Vermont be the first U.S. state to achieve universal single payer healthcare? Could we move towards real livable wages? Can this be done in the next five years? Are these things possible?

 

 Pollina:  Yes! Yes they are possible. I don’t really know what the time frame is because I’m not sure [how strong] the resistance will be.  But the things that you mention are things that Vermonters support. When you ask Vermonters if they support universal healthcare [and] if they’re willing to finance it…the answer is yes. The majority want to move in that direction. What it’s going to take is a person who is willing to have that conversation with Vermonters and then is willing to stand up with them. 

 

 Interviewer: Are you going to be that person?

 

 Pollina: I don’t know. I think if I were Governor I would be that person. Whether I’m going to be Governor right now or not is unknown because I have a lot of things that need to be figured out before we can really make that decision.

 

 Interviewer: I understand that you have had conversations with Mat Dunne [*2006 Democratic candidate for Lieutenant Governor and rumored 2008 candidate for Governor].

 

 Pollina: Well, yes, I’ve talked with a number of those [Democratic] folks including the Mat Dunne [as well as] the Chair of the Vermont Democratic Party. You know, you sit and you drink coffee and you talk about what may or may not happen… From my point of view what those conversations are mostly about [comes down to] ‘is there a way that Vermonters can come together and, for lack of a better word, unite around a candidate and build a grassroots movement strong enough to defeat Jim Douglas. Could Democrats, Progressives, disaffected Republicans, independents, and people who are getting fed up with the way Jim Douglas treats Vermonters come together to defeat him. Everybody says they want to do that, everybody says that’s what we need to do. And then we move into a discussion about who might be suited to do that. I certainly have given reasons as to why I think I can do that [but] I’m not 100% certain I’m ready to give up the other things I’m doing. We’ve [also] talked about [if] there are Democrats who could be able to play that role as well.  [However] I quite honestly think the list is relatively short for most of the Progressives I talk to, but we’re not closing the door to those options.

 

 Interviewer: But how much confidence do you have in the Democratic Party in Vermont?

 

 Pollina: What I think would be best would be to take [and incorporate] some of the good work that the grassroots Democrats have done and want to do. You know the Democratic Party is pretty broad in Vermont and obviously it is capable of electing people. [Most of] our Congressional delegation [and] most of our state office holders are Democrats. And I think most [rank and file] Democrats believe in universal healthcare and livable wages. Those are things Vermonters do believe in. For some reason that Democratic base has been unable to capture and shape the debate in a way that really moves beyond the politics of Jim Douglas. So I think there is a lot of good folks there, but what is lacking…is a leader at the statewide level who can better articulate what grassroots Democrats and Progressives really support… What you need is a person who can harness all that energy and yet articulate it in a way that would motivate Vermonters to dump Jim Douglas and [instead] take on a Governor who supports those things.

 

     So when you’re talking about the Democrats…a lot of them are neighbors and friends… The question is ‘given their majority [in the General Assembly] why are they not able to better control the debate?’ I don’t know why they can’t do that, I just know that they can’t.

 

 Interviewer: Some people would say the Democrats have a long history of half measures, symbolic actions.

 

 Pollina: Sure! First of all because they are a broad party in a sense there are a lot of [internal] factions. There are a lot of legislators who are Democrats who are not inspired by things like universal healthcare. [But] I think Democrats as Vermonters are, but that doesn’t mean that their elected officials are all committed to the same agenda. So that is one thing. I think that sometimes some of the people in the Democratic Party fall for Jim Douglas’s political line. They maybe start to believe that Vermonters don’t want to talk about these things. Some of them have come to rely over the years on the same sources of political power and money [as the Republicans] and they don’t want to alienate those people…

 

     A reporter said to me recently that ‘I don’t get the feeling that you’re talking to the Democratic powers that be.’ And I assume she meant these mythical people who live in Burlington who have a lot of money who tell Democrats what to do! Ha! I don’t even know who those people are!

 

 Interviewer: State Senator Hinda Miller could probably tell you.

 

 Pollina: And you know what? I haven’t asked! But that’s what the reporter said to me. So I told her ‘you’re absolutely right. Why would I be talking to those people while I’m talking to people who live and in communities where they are working people, who are farmers, those who are the base of the Vermont political movement who are going to defeat Jim Douglas. Those wealthier people who like to pull the strings are not necessarily committed to defeating Jim Douglas, its people in the county side who are committed to defeating Jim Douglas. I’m talking to those people! I’m not going to start a campaign from the top down, you start a campaign from the ground up because it is those people, the farmers and the working people and [organized] labor, it’s those people who are going to do the grunt work of making the campaign.

 

 Interviewer: Rumor has it the Vermont AFL-CIO President Lindol Atkins is ready to back you for Governor. Have you been talking to the AFL?

 

 Pollina: I was at their convention [in September] and I spoke with people there and I felt like there was a lot of support there. I did encourage them to play an active role in deciding who the candidates should be. What happens all the time is that the Democrats pick a candidate and then organized labor is expected to endorse that candidate. And I just suggested that they play a more active role not just this time but all the time.

 

 Interviewer: The war in Iraq?

 

 Pollina: What would you do with six hundred billion dollars? I mean everything we’re talking about would not even be an issue if we weren’t throwing all that money at a war which is immoral, unjust, unnecessary, and ironically enough opposed by 70% of the American public. You talk about democracy, and then you talk about how 70% of Americans don’t want something yet we have it, in this case a war. It tells you something about the Democratic Party on the national level.

 

 Interviewer: Can a Governor of Vermont find a way to bring the Vermont National Guard troops home?

 

 Pollina: I think a Vermont Governor could look for a way… I don’t say this definitively, but I believe that there are some rules about how the National Guard can be used or not used and at the discretion of the Governor. So I think that could be looked at… There are certainly ways in which the Governor could mobilize Vermonters to put pressure at the national level to put an end to a war that the great majority of Vermonters don’t want to be in.

 

     You know we have all these distinctions in Vermont. They tell is ‘this is the best place to live’, ‘Burlington is the best place to raise kid’, recently we’ve been designated the ‘smartest state’ based on how kids test –but we also have this rather dubious distinction of being the state with the highest number deaths of per capita in Iraq and we don’t really need that. That doesn’t rank with those others.           

 

 At this point of the interview Anthony’s wife Deborah Wolf appeared in the doorway.

 

 Deborah: Hi. I was just a little worried because you said you were going to call me when you were done.

 

 Pollina: Well, I guess I’m not done. –I was gonna call you.

 

 Interviewer: It’s my fault.

 

 Pollina: I can be done any second, but I haven’t finished doing what I was supposed to do. Are you in a hurry?

 

 Deborah: I guess I was ready to go home. Yeah.

 

 Pollina: OK.

 

 Interviewer: We can wrap this up. Any final words?

 

 Pollina: No.

 

 (We both laughed)

 

 Interviewer: Thanks Anthony.