Daily Archives: June 30, 2007

Vermont Business- Losing (Local) Control?

Chittenden Corp, Vermont’s banking Goliath, has announced that IT will be sold to an out of state bank.

The issue of loss of control lead me to spend a little time at the website of “Local First Vermont”, in an attempt to see what this might mean for Vermonters.

Cross-posted at Rip-and-Read

Thursday’s big news was that Vermont’s biggest bank was going to be bought by an even bigger bank from out of state. In a $1.9 billion dollar deal, Chittenden Corp is going to be sold to United Financial Inc. of Connecticut.

I don’t think the Chittenden Bank sale is the end of the world, but I do think it is worth keeping an eye on.

One obvious reason for concern is the potential loss of white collar jobs here in Vermont; both the Burlington Free Press and the Rutland Herald report that although officials from both banks expect layoffs to have minimal impact, there will be layoffs.

But there is something else to consider…the headquarters of Vermont’s largest banking presence will no longer be located here on Vermont soil. Vermont’s citizen’s will have lost a measure of local influence over an institution that plays a very important roll in the lives of many, many, many of our fellow citizens.

It may not seem important that the top officers of the bank may no longer reside in Vermont neighborhoods, belong to Vermont civic organizations, or send their children to Vermont schools, but there are studies that show that it might.

A trip to Local First Vermont’s website yields the results of several studies which illustrate the point. For example, Local First Vermont cites one study by the National Federation of Independent Business that claims that:

Small firms give an average of more than two and a half times the amount per employee than do medium or large firms (small firms give $789 per employee, medium-sized firms $172, and large firms $334)

It is of course more than community involvement or charitable giving…in the end, it comes down to the basic strength of our Vermont Economy….

The Economic Impact of Locally Owned Businesses vs. Chains: A Case Study in Midcoast Maine – September 2003
By Institute for Local Self-Reliance
This study tracked the revenue and expenditures of eight locally owned businesses in Midcoast Maine, as compared to big box stores.Key findings:

* Locally owned businesses spent 44.6 percent of their revenue within the surrounding two counties, and another 8.7 percent elsewhere in Maine, largely on wages and benefits paid to local employees, goods and services purchased from other local businesses, profits that accrued to local owners, and taxes paid to local and state government.

* Big box retailers return an estimated 14.1 percent of their revenue to the local economy, mostly as payroll. The rest leaves the state, flowing to out-of-state suppliers and back to corporate headquarters.

so I’ll leave you with one more thought and then urge you to to visit Local First Vermont’s website.

Free speech wins in the Supreme Court

Yes, you read that right. Even in these times of Bush's packed court there is the occasional bright spot, and this time it's because of a decision they decided not to make.

You may remember the case of Zach Guiles, a high school student from Williamstown who was suspended for wearing a T-shirt critical of George W. Bush, referring to him as the “chicken-hawk-in-chief”. The ostensible reason for the suspension was the presence of drug paraphernalia on the shirt, but the context made clear that the whole incident was prompted by a parent who didn't like the message. With the help of the Vermont ACLU Zach sued the Williamstown school board and won his case in the Second Circuit, so the school board asked the U.S. Supreme Court to grant a writ of certiorari to reverse the decision.

Although the denial of a writ of certiorari does not necessarily state that the underlying decision is correct, it terminates the litigation and finalizes whatever relief the winning side won in the appellate decision. This is great news, especially in light of the Court's decision earlier this week in  Morse v. Frederick, which upheld a school's decision to punish a student for speech that the principal thought was disruptive, even though it did not even take place on school grounds. Although new Chief Justice Roberts pretended to honor the principle that political speech is protected, possibly most chilling was Clarence Thomas's statement that,  “As originally understood, the Constitution does not afford students a right to free speech in public schools.

Congratulations to Zach Guiles and the Vermont ACLU! 

CO2 in the 802

CO2 Music Video

X10 has created “CO2” featuring C$, Run Rhymz, and P Nasty in an effort to overturn VT Governor Douglas' veto of H520 ,a bill towards cutting Vermonter's energy bills and cutting green house emissions, CO2 is to inform people about the dangers of global warming around the world and in Vermont.

[via YouTube, here; posted by Hartmannstudios (June 27, 2007); length: 3:13 minutes/seconds]

After viewing, one can take action, here [via VPIRG].

Spread the word!