Monthly Archives: May 2007

Isle La Motte Signs Settlement Agreement

crossposted @ rednalsiofvermont.blogspot.com

Yep that’s right folks you heard about it here first. That tiny town in Vermont on a small island in Lake Champlain signed a settlement agreement with their former town clerk and treasurer. After being involved in litigation and lawsuits, and being raked over the coals by the Burlington Free Press, it looks like the town might be able to regain some sense of normalcy.

This past Wednesday the settlement was passed by the selectboard, with one abstention which we all know counts toward the majority. With the addition of some words at an executive session the night before, the lawyer for the townspeople suing the town and selectboard members, said it would appease his clients. May that poor town once again return to its sleepy existance.

Rachel Louise Carson (May 27, 1907 – April 14, 1964)

( – promoted by odum)

(Also posted at DailyKos)

Today is the Centennial of Rachel Carson’s birth, and event that deserves to be recognized, especially in these times of struggle to speak truth to power and to overturn the damaging decisions being made by powerful corporate interests.

Rachel Carson proved that a single person can rally a country to see the truth. Even more important than her accomplishments towards banning the use of DDT, she showed the nation that People Power can be a force to be reckoned with.

Do we have a new Rachel Carson in our midst? My thoughts on that after some quotes about Carson below…

Today is the Centennial of Rachel Carson’s birth, and event that deserves to be recognized, especially in these times of struggle to speak truth to power and to overturn the damaging decisions being made by powerful corporate interests.

Rachel Carson proved that a single person can rally a country to see the truth. Even more important than her accomplishments towards banning the use of DDT, she showed the nation that People Power can be a force to be reckoned with.

Do we have a new Rachel Carson in our midst? Thoughts on that after some quotes about Carson below…

Her main accomplishments and her legacy are her books. They are well worth the read, both her first 3 “naturalist” books and her epic, activist Silent Spring.

Books Written By Rachel Carson

The biography by Linda Lear also adds a perspective on how remarkable and inspiring it was that Carson was able to move so many readers through her words.

This rather quiet spoken woman used the power of eloquently written words to literally change the world.

Time Top 100 Most Important People of the 20th Century

Before there was an environmental movement, there was one brave woman and her very brave book

Her legacy endures, with Republicans fighting her still:

Boston Globe article

Her place in the American imagination is enduring: “Silent Spring,” published in 1962, led to the creation of the Environmental Protection Agency and to banning the pesticide dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane, or DDT.

But revisionists are busy besmirching Carson’s legacy. In Washington, Senator Tom Coburn, an Oklahoma Republican, has placed a stop on an innocuous resolution praising Carson on the centennial occasion. The resolution notes her “legacy of scientific rigor coupled with poetic sensibility.”

Al Gore has been mentioned as the “new Rachel Carson” for his work on Global Climate Change with “An Inconvenient Truth”. I think that’s a fair comparison. I wonder if his newest book, “The Assault on Reason” will be another significant voice on the state of our political “ecosystem”?

Exciting DemocracyFest News!

Greg Palast, author and progressive journalist, has joined the list of speakers for the 4th Annual DemocracyFest. Other speakers include Sen. John Edwards, Gov. Howard Dean (free and open to the public), Sen. Mike Gravel, Bev Harris, and more! See the schedule and get your tickets at http://www.Democracy…

Trainings and panels offered include Impeachment, Creating Community Websites, Service Politics, Anatomy of a Grassroots Campaign, Framing, Peak Oil, Election Law, Democracy and the Religious Right, Pollworker Training, Making the Most of Grassroots Volunteers, the DFA Training Academy, and more!

All this plus lots of live music, films, and most importantly, networking with liberal activists from across the country. Don’t miss this chance to form working relationships that will have a lasting effect on our issue-based activities and our efforts to elect fiscally responsible and socially progressive candidates.

The 4th Annual DemocracyFest will take place June 9-10 at the Wayfarer Inn near Manchester, NH. More information is available at http://www.Democracy…

The Psychology of Conservation

( – promoted by odum)

Imagine two scenarios.

In the first, your electric company charges you a premium rate for power when demand is highest – typically on a super-hot summer afternoon when air conditioners everywhere are churning out cold air.

In the second, the utility gives you a refund for not consuming electricity during those peak-demand hours.

Which one would you be more likely to accept?

This is the question being asked by Robert Letzler, as reported in the Santa Rosa Press Democrat, and its a fascinating one. 

What do you think would be more motivational?  How do you think this sort of approach could be used to influence how we deal with the task of encouraging people to be more responsible in their consumption habits?

I ask about all of this because it’s clear that something needs to change and while people, in the abstract, seem to like the idea of conservation, we don’t seem to be motivated in the more concrete fashions.  I’d like to see what people think in terms of what we can do to change things. 

The photo shown, by the way, is of a long-tailed duck.  It’s from earlier this week, the first time I’ve ever managed to successfully photograph one.

You can learn a lot about the effects of climate change by getting into bird watching.  Every thing is happening much earlier this year (i.e., nesting and breeding) than usual and who knows what effect that’s going to have on the broader ecosystem? 

THE FIRST VERMONT PRESIDENTIAL STRAW POLL (for links to the candidates exploratory committees, refer to the diary on the right-hand column)!!! If the 2008 Vermont Democratic Presidential Primary were

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Welch and the Changing Rules

Although he received wide praise across the blogs when he stated unequivocally his intention to vote against the Iraq, no-strings-attached, give-Bush-what-he-wants supplemental bill, the question of the rule that essentially streamines and fast tracks the bill through the floor process by insuring no amendments that aren’t friendly to the President’s no-strings-attached demand was hanging.

Presumably, Democratic supporters of the President’s Iraq agenda (which is what voting for this bill expresses, regardlesss of any hemming and hawing) want to guarantee that they will be on record as little as possible in support of Bush’s demands, and David Sirota (and others) speculated that this rule gives them that cover in a fairly underhanded way.

But the fact is that the rule has changed – and not simply in that it provides for another up-or-down vote on the war itself in Septemeber (as Sirota already noted). The final rule severed the provisions of the bill into two distinct votes; seperating the appropriation provision from the domestic spending elements (for example $6.4 billion in hurricane relief and $3 billion in agricultural assistance) of the bill, which many progressive legislators support. In this way, the rule passed by attracting the votes of the most solid anti-war liberals in the caucus, such as Reps. Woolsey, Lee, and yeah, Welch.

So the rule passes (and of course, the supplemental does too – which was inevitable), but I can’t get too bent out of shape. I can’t help but think I would’ve done the same thing, albeit grudgingly.

Leahy on the Democratic Capitulation on Iraq

Via email:

There is much that I support in this bill — including assistance for Afghanistan and funding we added to help the National Guard address equipment shortages — but it contains a serious flaw that I simply cannot vote for:  It does not begin the withdrawal of our troops from Iraq.

The original supplemental bill that passed the Senate and was sent to President Bush’s desk last month paralleled the recommendations of the Iraq Study Group, recommendations that would have fundamentally changed the course of our military mission in Iraq.

Unfortunately, the President vetoed the original supplemental bill and has refused any meaningful compromise that would give us a clear path toward ending of our military involvement in Iraq.

This brings us to the current version of the supplemental bill.  In short, the Iraq War funding provisions in this bill represent little more than a continuation of the failed status quo — a continuation that I find unacceptable. The current bill will not begin to redeploy our troops from Iraq, it does not put adequate pressure on the Iraqis to stand up both politically and militarily, and it does not put a stop to President Bush’s escalation plan.

I’m not on Bernie’s list (not sure why not, actually). If anybody gets something from him on the matter, I encourage you to post it.

An Old Burlington Free Press “It’s My Turn” Op-Ed of Mine (7/14/2002) re: Homelessness & Hope …

( – promoted by odum)

Heard a report today from someone in Burlington whom I have nothing but the deepest of respect for that the police are once again hassling people who are living homeless in encampments in the area, forcing them to move on (to where they are supposed to live, I have not a clue), something I find very disheartening.

Thus it came to mind to post up the following item [cross-posted from the recently reactivated and revamped North American Homeless News Network (NAHNN) blog, here].

Logo: Homeless People's Network (HPN) discussion listserv; click here to be redirected to the HPN informational siteDuring an online search within the archives of the Homeless People’s Network discussion listserv for items from around this time of year back in 2002 concerning people living in homeless encampments within Burlington, Vermont, I managed to stumble upon an old op-ed of mine posted there, one which I had completely forgotten about.

Since I was not blogging until later that same year, I have decided to reprint this particular version of my original The Many Hats of Homelessness essay here:

Sunday, July 14, 2002
Burlington Free Press
[Burlington, Vermont]
Editorial/Opinion section
“It’s My Turn”/Op-Ed segment
Homelessness is having no place to hang your hat

By Morgan W. Brown

If “home is where one hangs one’s hat,” where does a person who is living homeless hang their hat?

When a person hangs their hat someplace temporarily, are they no longer considered truly homeless even if, in fact, it is not really their home?

Being homeless myself, I know well how the smallest items of hope are always held onto very tightly.

Just like one’s own sense of dignity, self-respect, pride — which are equally cherished and held close, such hope can often prove extremely useful and even vital in the long journey being undertaken just in managing to survive as well as living independently.

These core parts of one’s self can also be key to what is needed to help find, obtain and then move into some form of safe, decent and affordable housing of one’s own; which is an essential part of what is needed to end homelessness.

As near as it may be to my becoming housed once again, after being homeless in its various forms for nearly five years this time around, one would think nothing could easily stand in my way.

Yet, there are many moments when it seems too daunting and so very far away to ever be accomplished on one’s own.

There are those days, and even weeks, which do not seem to pass by without a severe and persistent need to find and renew hope, inner strength as well as faith in everything.

Almost constantly, in many different ways, I remind myself that whatever the circumstances or, how they are experienced and felt, there are always other ways of thinking about them and other methods of accomplishing something when it is waited for a little while longer and, what is sought is looked for even deeper than we may believe is possible and, the support needed to do so is received.

Just as crucial though, the value of the smallest or seemingly least important thing to provide inspiration should never be underestimated; often found in what we may perceive to be the most unlikely of places or persons, especially when it is needed the most.

These are among the things which often help me to never, ever, give up on anything or anybody — and, most importantly, never on myself.

When I do find and move into a place of my own, my hat will be hung where it can be grabbed at ease when needed. Then whenever it is off of my head and in its usual resting place, I will know I am home.

Morgan W. Brown is living homeless in Montpelier.

[via HPN archives, here (2nd item posted; Sunday, July 14, 2002)]

The original version of my The Many Hats of Homelessness three-part essay was archived on HPN:

THE FIRST VERMONT PRESIDENTIAL STRAW POLL (for links to the candidates exploratory committees, refer to the diary on the right-hand column)!!! If the 2008 Vermont Democratic Presidential Primary were

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

US House Dem Leadership Coming Dangerously Close to Declaring War With the Netroots

The other day I wrote a diary entitled “fear”, describing how (IMHO), the Democratic Leadership in Washington (and to an extent in the states) is primarily motivated by fear in much of what they do. I discussed how that fear translates into weakness and capitulation.

It also can translate into sleaze. In a diary at dKos, David Sirota (who has done a great job researching and birddogging some of the creepy, behind-the-scenes stuff that some of the newly empowered Democratic Committee Chairs are trying to get away with) lays out the proposal to turn today’s expected capitualtion vote on Iraq into a craven capitulation vote on Iraq:

Here’s how it is expected to work today in a process only Dick Cheney could love (though you never know – it could change at the last minute). Every bill comes to the House floor with what is known as a “rule” that sets the terms of the debate over the legislation in question. House members first vote to approve this parliamentary rule, and then vote on the legislation. Today, however, Democrats are planning to essentially include the Iraq blank check bill IN the rule itself, by making sure the underlying bill the rule brings to the floor includes no timelines for withdrawal, and that the rule only allows amendments that fund the war with no restrictions – blank check amendments that House Democratic leaders know Republicans will have the votes to pass.

This means that when the public goes to look for the real vote on the Iraq supplemental bill, the public won’t find that. All we will find is a complex parliamentary procedure vote, which was the real vote.

With our lone Representative, Peter Welch, already on the right side on this, there’s little we in Vermont can do about it.

But it’s worth noting that such an action will be seen as the crudest sort of condescension and insult to the netroots across the country. An insult that could (and should) have consequences.

Does Vermont ‘CARE’ Enough?

[Disclaimer: I have no connection to Vermont CARES, never served on their Board, never worked for them, never used their services, never even volunteered. I’ve made an occasional donation, and I’ve written about the agency before elsewhere (see the link below). I wrote this because even a temporary shutdown due to a major but relatively short-term funding shortfall will leave clients with nowhere to go.]

1986 was a watershed year for the gay and lesbian communities in Vermont. Among other advocacy organizations founded that year was Vermont CARES (Committee on AIDS Resources, Education, and Services) — back when a lot of the stigma attached to AIDS was because of its spread among gay men. Democratic activist Terje Anderson was one of the founders, along with Keith Goslant, among others. They were the first group to offer “safe sex” information and workshops to Vermonters based on current medical fact rather than scare tactics.

Now Vermont CARES is in its 21st year, and has been serving people with HIV/AIDS way beyond the gay community for a long time. A couple of years ago, under then-director Kendall Farrell, the agency opted not to apply for federal funds for prevention because accepting the money meant also accepting intrusive federal regulations on data reporting and requirements for Bush-administration-beloved “abstinence only” education, among other things.

Today, Vermont CARES has scraped a pretty deep hole through and below the bottom of the barrel — to the tune of $100K. It’s not just because of the federal funding they opted to forego. Add to that the shift in funding by a few major foundations away from “service” to “policy,” and the decreasing attention to the domestic disease in public awareness, and you’ve got a “perfect storm” creating a huge hole where a budget used to be.

Three other factors: First, AIDS is no longer a death sentence — it doesn’t carry that tragic “zing” factor of young lives cut short. Now we’re looking at — and Vermont CARES is supporting — the survivors of the early years who are in their fifties and sixties and dealing with both the disease and the decade or more of side effects from anti-retroviral meds, the famous “cocktail.” 

The disease is about as sexy as Alzheimer’s, but mostly without so much dementia. Treatment side effects include lipodystrophy (migration of body fat in ways that might disfigure) and neuropathy (the often painful loss of sensation and sometimes of autonomic responses in the nervous system, typically hands and feet, but not always). Add in potential liver damage, cardiovascular stress, and clinical depression, and that’s a lot of now-chronic health issues to deal with that carry absolutely no zing.

Points two and three below the fold, along with what you can do to help, should you be so moved.

Second, most of the public’s limited attention for AIDS has turned overseas, specifically to Africa, which needs all the first world attention it can get, especially when that attention includes help with expensive medicines. It’s a good thing, and thanks to the William and Melinda Gates Foundation, among others, that help is happening. And, unfortunately, people here forget that they can have a positive impact two doors down the street as well as thousands of miles away on another continent.

Third, there are many more places in Vermont now where people at risk for HIV can get tested and treated without running a gauntlet of prejudice and  disapproval, particularly if they have health insurance. That’s another good thing. But what it means is that the insured now go to Fletcher Allen, for example, while the uninsured, disabled, and unemployed go to CARES. Something like 90% of CARES’ clients make less than $12k a year.

CARES runs the only specialized combined AIDS residence in the state — in Fort Ethan Allen in Colchester. It runs another ten scattered residences housing 20-25 people and subsidizes housing for another 30-40 people.

It was the first to offer rapid testing with results in 20 minutes instead of the two weeks it used to take, and that has resulted in many more people getting tested because they don’t have to live in uncertainty for days on end.

CARES fills in the gaps for people whose lives are full of potholes: whose electricity gets turned off because a medicaid payment was late, and the money for the electric bill was used to fill in; or whose choice is between paying for transportation to medical appointments and buying groceries. They subsidize food and actual meals for those who need it, and have partnered with the Intervale Society to provide organic veggies when available.

There’s way more to this story in terms of the services CARES provides, but let me close with one really important one: CARES makes it possible for Vermonters with HIV/AIDS — some of whom live in the back end of beyond, far away from Burlington or Montpelier or Rutland, in places like Highgate, Derby Line, Coventry, Montgomery, Eden, Troy, Middletown Springs, Fayston, Worcester, Corinth — to be able to talk to others in the same boat when they can’t talk to their friends and neighbors about the elephantine impact of this disease in their lives.

The agency has a plan for the future and a funding source that doesn’t kick in until the new fiscal year begins on October 1. In the meantime, I’m writing a check (scroll down for the address of the main office in Burlington) and asking friends and allies to do the same. If enough folks each help out some, the hole below the barrel will get filled in and the barrel bottom patched and waterproofed, with maybe a gallon or two to keep CARES going.

NanuqFC

In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. — George Orwell

Saint Patrick is Losing His Halo

(Because impeachment really is too important NOT to ignore! – promoted by Brattlerouser)

Patrick Leahy, Vermont’s senior Senator recently replied to a constituent urging him to support impeachment efforts underway in the Congress to impeach Vice President Cheney. Consider these profoundly troubling utterances of Saint Patrick.

“Thank you for contacting me about Vice President Cheney From the time President Bush and Vice President Cheney first took office in 2001, many Vermonters have shared with me their concerns about the actions and policy priorities of this Administration. Along with Senator Sanders and Congressman Peter Welch, I share the frustration and anger of the Vermont Senate and many Vermonters. I have strongly objected to a number of the Administration’s policy objectives and am ready to restore checks and balances and close oversight of the Administration.”

What does it mean to “be ready” to restore checks and balances? As evidenced by Leahy’s inactions, it does not mean any investigation into unconstitutional actions taken by the President or Vice President. While the Senator is wasting weeks and months looking into the political firings of prosecutors by the Attorney General, Bush and company are unabashedly escalating troop levels in support of their occupation of Iraq, as well as issuing executive directives declaring that Bush will have control of the entire federal government if he deems it necessary.

We don’t need the Senator to share our frustrations and anger, we’ve got that pretty well covered as citizens. What we expect is remedial action by the Senators whose very job description is to provide checks and balances to executive power. “Strong objections” expressed in a photo-op does not cut it. If he’s ready to restore Constitutional balance, what is he waiting for, the President’s permission?

” I have been opposed to the war in Iraq from the beginning and I am committed to pressing for an end to the war & to bring our troops home. As Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, I will continue to push for aggressive oversight into many of these issues, including the mass firings of U.S. Attorneys.”

What does your commitment entail Mr. Leahy? Commitment usually implies that actions will follow. Once again, your constituents are doing a fine job of voicing opprobrium; we look to you for action. Why are you not investigating that lies that were told by the President and Vice President in order to get us into this war? Why are you not investigating the roles of Bush and Cheney in making torture part and parcel of America’s intelligence gathering efforts? The firing of US attorneys is the only investigation that the Senator has thus far been willing to conduct. Mr. Bush must be quaking in his boots.

Read more below the fold.

” On April 24, Representative Dennis Kucinich of Ohio introduced H. R. 333, legislation calling for the impeachment of Vice President Cheney for high crimes and misdemeanors. This bill was referred to the House Judiciary Committee. As the Administration and Congress remain divided on many issues, I will look for ways to bring people together to make progress on issues facing the nation.”

You need look no further than to hold this administration accountable for its actions. An overwhelming majority of Americans are in agreement that this administration is taking us in the wrong direction. Bringing the truth out into the open is a way to unite, not divide politicians. As long as you are unwilling to let the debate proceed beyond opinion and conjecture, you will continue to have a partisan divide.

“An impeachment inquiry would be a highly divisive ordeal that would dominate Congress’ time and attention.”


While impeachment may start to crack the monolith that is the Democrat/Republican power structure that supports American hegemony over the world’s oil and over the Middle East, and which is willing to use military occupation as a means to realize this hegemony, the American public will support any inquiry that actually gets at the truth that has led us into our current untenable state. As the truth about Alberto Gonzales has emerged in your recent hearings, we have seen support for him lessen among Republicans, rather than see them circle the wagons in his defense. we would see no less as a result of investigations of the President and Vice President.

“Impeachment proceedings would likely compromise the ability of Congress to address the many issues that face our nation during the remainder of this Administration. With a closely divided Congress, the outcome of an impeachment proceeding is uncertain and the problems facing our country are numerous, Congress must set priorities to accomplish the most important tasks that the American people agree need to be accomplished.”

While the House Judiciary Committee was investigating and voting articles of impeachment against Richard Nixon, they also managed to raise the minimum wage, pass the Endangered Species act, initiate several new environmental programs and raise the minimum wage. the current Congress has not managed to do as much even without the “distraction” of impeachment.

Your assertion that we must set priorities implies that defending the Constitution as your oath of office requires not be one of them. The defense of our Constitution, and by extension the validity of the governance of the Republic is our first priority. Without Constitutional rule of law, we are a sham democracy and your participation in it nothing more than play acting.

Outrage plays well in the movies. Your job however, is to deal with real life and real issues. Histrionics and rhetoric do a disservice to your job and to the nation. We know that you can do better and we expect you to do so without further delay.

The Democratic Party is proving itself to be one of Bush/Cheney enablers. It is becoming depressingly clear that the continued occupation of Iraq is a Democratic policy as much as a Republican one. We gave you a mandate is November 2006. Do not continue to squander it.

“Thank you again for contacting me.”

No problem. You’re welcome.