Daily Archives: January 29, 2007

Kids These Days, and Other News…

My three year old celebrated his birthday by getting into my email client and replying to my emails. Blogger Morgan Brown got a strange email, Welch Communications Director Andrew Savage got a blank email, and State Dem Chair Ian Carleton received an email with words of wisdom .jm ,n n m oikhmop. Some might not find any substantive difference between these messages and emails that actually come from me…

From my kiddo to less mature individuals, marginally socialized talk radio yapper Michael Savage has this to say about Bernie (via Media Matters, here’s the audio clip):

On the January 25 broadcast of his nationally syndicated radio show, Michael Savage attacked Sen. Bernard Sanders (I-VT), saying, “Kiss my behind, you psycho,” and “Screw you, you jealous loser.” Savage also called Sanders “a rat,” “a bum,” and “a dirty socialist” and told him to “go to hell.”

Sometimes, you can really judge a person by the quality of their enemies.

House Appropriations Committee Chairwoman Martha Heath (D-Westford) must be wondering what deity she offended. News broke last week that a mandated appropriation for education has been simply left out of the last few budgets, and today comes wrangling over whether or not a seeming over-appropriation for senior care programs should be diverted to other programs. Big fun. Meanwhile, the Governor’s office basically responds with the “we don’t know nuthin’, we just work here” defense.

If you haven’t listened to the latest Philip Baruth/Alex Ball/Neil Jensen “Audio Dream Theater,” stop what you’re doing and go listen. Even funnier than the first one!

Why haven’t I ever linked to Dohiyi Mir before? A quick search reveals that I haven’t ever. Huh. Well, go check out NTodd’s State of the Union speech drinking game.

John McCain, Pander Bear

Good little mini-documentary form Robert Greenwald documenting the many times John McCain’s ‘Straight Talk’ was anything but… It’s really fun to watch this principle-free hack politically self-destruct right before our eyes, a little more every time he opens his mouth. He’s gonna have that Bush anchor around his neck like a noose come ’08. Good. Now if we could just do something about Lieberman…

Worst. President. Ever.

I saw this graphic from the New York Times on MyDD the other day — and boy do some pictures speak louder than words, huh?

NYT Bush Polling

And I particularly enjoyed this bit from the latest Newsweek poll

  …more than half the country (58 percent) say they wish the Bush  presidency were simply over, a sentiment that is almost unanimous among  Democrats (86 percent), and is shared by a clear majority (59 percent)  of independents and even one in five (21 percent) Republicans.

Now, to be honest, I’m more on the side of the "put the fire out before you convict the arsonist" school (with it’s corollary: Investigate First, Call for Impeachment Later), but these disenchanted voters should be reminded that there is a way to ensure that Bush’s presidency ends sooner than later.

Hillary doesn’t ‘get it’ either ……

I think I’m gonna be sick!  Since Bush has already promised to leave his debacle to the next President to solve, I think this is an equally irresponsible remark from Hillary. We need someone who will push legislation through to bring our troops home now.  We need someone to hit the ground running on 1.20.09 with a list in hand of issues that need immediate attention, with advisors that are expert in their field and with a Congress who will work together.  This is nothing but pablum for the masses. 

  NewsMax.com Wires
  Monday, Jan. 29, 2007
http://www.newsmax.c…

DAVENPORT, Iowa — Hillary Rodham Clinton said Sunday that President Bush should withdraw all U.S. troops from Iraq before he leaves office, asserting it would be “the height of irresponsibility” to pass the war along to the next commander in chief.

“This was his decision to go to war with an ill-conceived plan and an incompetently executed strategy,” the Democratic senator from New York said her in initial presidential campaign swing through Iowa.

 

“We expect him to extricate our country from this before he leaves office” in January 2009, the former first lady said.

The White House condemned Clinton’s comments as a partisan attack that undermines U.S. soldiers.

About 130,000 American troops are in Iraq and Bush has announced he was sending 21,500 more as part of his new war strategy.
Clinton held a town hall-style forum attended by about 300 activists, giving a brief speech before taking questions for nearly an hour. Pressed to defend her vote to authorize force in Iraq before the U.S.-led invasion in March 2003, Clinton responded by stepping up her criticism of Bush.

“I am going to level with you, the president has said this is going to be left to his successor,” Clinton said. “I think it is the height of irresponsibility and I really resent it.”

Bush describes Iraq as the central front in the global fight against terrorism that began after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. “The war on terror will be a problem for the next president. Presidents after me will be confronting … an enemy that would like to strike the United States again,” he recently told USA Today.

One questioner asked Clinton if her track record showed she could stand up to “evil men” around the world.

“The question is, we face a lot of dangers in the world and, in the gentleman’s words, we face a lot of evil men and what in my background equips me to deal with evil and bad men,” Clinton said. She paused to gaze while the audience interrupted with about 30 seconds of laughter and applause.

Meeting later with reporters, she was pressed repeatedly to explain what she meant. She insisted it was a simple joke.

“I thought I was funny,” Clinton said. “You guys keep telling me to lighten up, be funny. I get a little funny and now I’m being psychoanalyzed.”

She told reporters that evil men included al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden, who remains at large. “Isn’t it about time we get serious about that?” she said.

During the town hall meeting, she tried to make clear that she thinks she would be a chief executive with enough fortitude to confront any danger facing the country.

“I believe that a lot in my background and a lot in my public life shows the character and toughness that is required to be president,” Clinton said. “It also shows that I want to get back to bringing the world around to support us again.”

The meeting was scheduled for a downtown restaurant but was switched to a pavilion at a nearby park when it became clear that hundreds of people planned to attend.

At virtually all her stops in this early nominating state, she ran into questions about her Iraq vote. She says Bush misled Congress and she now wants a cap on the number of troops, as well as beginning a “phased redeployment” of troops from Iraq.

The White House said it was disappointing that Clinton was responding to Bush’s new war strategy “with a partisan attack that sends the wrong message to our troops, our enemies and the Iraqi people who are working to make this plan succeed.”

“The height of irresponsibility,” spokesman Rob Saliterman said, “would be to cap our troop numbers at an arbitrary figure and to cut off their funding.”

Clinton does not support cutting funding for American troops, but does favor that step for Iraqi forces if the Baghdad government fails to meet certain conditions.

Clinton defended the role that Congress has played, saying newly empowered Democrats are beginning to build pressure on Bush to act, but the public needs to be patient.

“We are at the beginning of a process,” Clinton said. “It’s a frustrating process, our system is sometimes frustrating.”

In making the case for her candidacy, Clinton cites her years as first lady, when Bill Clinton was president for two terms, and two winning campaigns for the Senate.

“I believe that my qualification and my life experience equip me to hit the ground running in January of 2009,” Clinton said. “I have a unique perspective having been in the White House for eight years and understanding the challenge that comes from trying to govern our great country.”

Clinton said he will run hard in Iowa’s leadoff caucuses, an early contest her husband skipped when he sought the nomination in 1992. That year, Iowa Sen. Tom Harkin was in the race and Democratic rivals opted not to challenge him in his home state.

“My participation in the Iowa caucuses is the only thing in politics that I will do that Bill has not done,” she said.

© 2007 Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

 

Rob Roper is Chair of the VT GOP

(We’ll have more on Roper soon, but in the meantime I’m glad someone brought this front and center. In a nutshell, Roper is the hard right idealogue director of Vermont’s branch of former GOP US House Majority Leader Dick Armey’s Freedom Works organization. As John points out below, Roper is a regular on WDEV’s True North program – a program that wallows regularly in many unfortunate extremes, including outright anti-gay bigotry. It’s discouraging from the perspective that we’d like to move beyond such crap in Vermont, but on the other hand, having a self-parodying reactionary at the helm of the GOP will be helpful come election time… – promoted by odum)

If you want to learn about Roper’s opinions, check him out Thursdays from 11-noon on WDEV.

State GOP picks education activist as chairman

MONTPELIER, Vt. (AP) — The state Republican Party has chosen education activist Robert Roper as its new chairman.

Roper, of Stowe, said he used a forum before the Republican State Committee earlier this month to rally the Republican Party, praising the governor’s call for a cap on general fund spending, and Republican lawmakers’ efforts to repeal the statewide property tax that pays for education, pass a property taxpayer’s bill of rights and bring Jessica’s Law, which would restrict where paroled sex offenders could live, to the state.

“There’s a lot of great stuff going on in the Statehouse and coming out of the governor’s office,” Roper said Saturday.

Roper, who competed against former state Rep. Alan Parent of St. Albans for the post, replaces former Chairman James Barnett, who resigned last month to join the budding presidential campaign of Arizona Sen. John McCain. Barnett held the post as a full-time job and fulfilled many of the responsibilities of the executive director.

Roper said he envisioned making both the chairman and executive director full-time jobs. An executive director has not yet been named.

Roper has served as Vermont director of Freedom Works, a national group dedicated to lower taxes and smaller government. He also helped run Republican Jack McMullen’s unsuccessful U.S. Senate campaign against Democrat Patrick Leahy in 2004.

More on single-payer healthcare…

Good, straightforward article by Stephen Fleischmann on Smirking Chimp today, ‘Who’s Afraid of Single Payer?’ :

Who’s afraid of the single payer health plan, otherwise known as National Health Insurance? Big Pharma and the medical establishment, that’s who-because “single payer” is the big bad wolf that’s huffing and puffing and is about to blow their house down. And it’s a big house, bloated by excess profits, government subsidies and sheer theft of the people’s money.

More below the fold…

Now, I understand the philosophical conservative viewpoint against single-payer healthcare. I don’t agree with it, but I understand it. This article isn’t so much about philosophy, it’s about practicality. As I think of our nation, I see certain things that are detrimental to society that are kept  in place because it protects an industry. Healthcare is one of those things. When are the tables going to turn? When is someone going to ask what is more important in the grand scheme of things, protection of an industry or the health of a nation?