Daily Archives: December 29, 2006

Riverbend: true conditions in Iraq

( – promoted by odum)

This is Riverbend, a young Iraqi woman living in Baghdad speaking about conditions in Iraq after almost four years of American/Coalition occupation. 
http://riverbendblog…

Baghdad Burning
… I’ll meet you ’round the bend my friend, where hearts can heal and souls can mend…

Friday, December 29, 2006

End of Another Year…

You know your country is in trouble when:
The UN has to open a special branch just to keep track of the chaos and bloodshed, UNAMI.
Abovementioned branch cannot be run from your country.
 

The politicians who worked to put your country in this sorry state can no longer be found inside of, or anywhere near, its borders.

The only thing the US and Iran can agree about is the deteriorating state of your nation.

An 8-year war and 13-year blockade are looking like the country’s ‘Golden Years’.

Your country is purportedly ‘selling’ 2 million barrels of oil a day, but you are standing in line for 4 hours for black market gasoline for the generator.

For every 5 hours of no electricity, you get one hour of public electricity and then the government announces it’s going to cut back on providing that hour.

Politicians who supported the war spend tv time debating whether it is ‘sectarian bloodshed’ or ‘civil war’.

People consider themselves lucky if they can actually identify the corpse of the relative that’s been missing for two weeks.

A day in the life of the average Iraqi has been reduced to identifying corpses, avoiding car bombs and attempting to keep track of which family members have been detained, which ones have been exiled and which ones have been abducted.

2006 has been, decidedly, the worst year yet. No- really. The magnitude of this war and occupation is only now hitting the country full force. It’s like having a big piece of hard, dry earth you are determined to break apart. You drive in the first stake in the form of an infrastructure damaged with missiles and the newest in arms technology, the first cracks begin to form. Several smaller stakes come in the form of politicians like Chalabi, Al Hakim, Talbani, Pachachi, Allawi and Maliki. The cracks slowly begin to multiply and stretch across the once solid piece of earth, reaching out towards its edges like so many skeletal hands. And you apply pressure. You surround it from all sides and push and pull. Slowly, but surely, it begins coming apart- a chip here, a chunk there.

That is Iraq right now. The Americans have done a fine job of working to break it apart. This last year has nearly everyone convinced that that was the plan right from the start. There were too many blunders for them to actually have been, simply, blunders. The ‘mistakes’ were too catastrophic. The people the Bush administration chose to support and promote were openly and publicly terrible- from the conman and embezzler Chalabi, to the terrorist Jaffari, to the militia man Maliki. The decisions, like disbanding the Iraqi army, abolishing the original constitution, and allowing militias to take over Iraqi security were too damaging to be anything but intentional.

The question now is, but why? I really have been asking myself that these last few days. What does America possibly gain by damaging Iraq to this extent? I’m certain only raving idiots still believe this war and occupation were about WMD or an actual fear of Saddam.

Al Qaeda? That’s laughable. Bush has effectively created more terrorists in Iraq these last 4 years than Osama could have created in 10 different terrorist camps in the distant hills of Afghanistan. Our children now play games of ‘sniper’ and ‘jihadi’, pretending that one hit an American soldier between the eyes and this one overturned a Humvee.

This last year especially has been a turning point. Nearly every Iraqi has lost so much. So much. There’s no way to describe the loss we’ve experienced with this war and occupation. There are no words to relay the feelings that come with the knowledge that daily almost 40 corpses are found in different states of decay and mutilation. There is no compensation for the dense, black cloud of fear that hangs over the head of every Iraqi. Fear of things so out of ones hands, it borders on the ridiculous- like whether your name is ‘too Sunni’ or ‘too Shia’. Fear of the larger things- like the Americans in the tank, the police patrolling your area in black bandanas and green banners, and the Iraqi soldiers wearing black masks at the checkpoint.

Again, I can’t help but ask myself why this was all done? What was the point of breaking Iraq so that it was beyond repair? Iran seems to be the only gainer. Their presence in Iraq is so well-established, publicly criticizing a cleric or ayatollah verges on suicide. Has the situation gone so beyond America that it is now irretrievable? Or was this a part of the plan all along? My head aches just posing the questions.

What has me most puzzled right now is: why add fuel to the fire? Sunnis and moderate Shia are being chased out of the larger cities in the south and the capital. Baghdad is being torn apart with Shia leaving Sunni areas and Sunnis leaving Shia areas- some under threat and some in fear of attacks. People are being openly shot at check points or in drive by killingsā€¦ Many colleges have stopped classes. Thousands of Iraqis no longer send their children to school- it’s just not safe.

Why make things worse by insisting on Saddam’s execution now? Who gains if they hang Saddam? Iran, naturally, but who else? There is a real fear that this execution will be the final blow that will shatter Iraq. Some Sunni and Shia tribes have threatened to arm their members against the Americans if Saddam is executed. Iraqis in general are watching closely to see what happens next, and quietly preparing for the worst.

This is because now, Saddam no longer represents himself or his regime. Through the constant insistence of American war propaganda, Saddam is now representative of all Sunni Arabs (never mind most of his government were Shia). The Americans, through their speeches and news articles and Iraqi Puppets, have made it very clear that they consider him to personify Sunni Arab resistance to the occupation. Basically, with this execution, what the Americans are saying is “Look-Sunni Arabs- this is your man, we all know this. We’re hanging him- he symbolizes you.” And make no mistake about it, this trial and verdict and execution are 100% American. Some of the actors were Iraqi enough, but the production, direction and montage was pure Hollywood (though low-budget, if you ask me).

That is, of course, why Talbani doesn’t want to sign his death penalty- not because the mob man suddenly grew a conscience, but because he doesn’t want to be the one who does the hanging- he won’t be able to travel far away enough if he does that.

Maliki’s government couldn’t contain their glee. They announced the ratification of the execution order before the actual court did. A few nights ago, some American news program interviewed Maliki’s bureau chief, Basim Al-Hassani who was speaking in accented American English about the upcoming execution like it was a carnival he’d be attending. He sat, looking sleazy and not a little bit ridiculous, his dialogue interspersed with ‘gonna’, ‘gotta’ and ‘wanna’… Which happens, I suppose, when the only people you mix with are American soldiers.

My only conclusion is that the Americans want to withdraw from Iraq, but would like to leave behind a full-fledged civil war because it wouldn’t look good if they withdraw and things actually begin to improve, would it?

Here we come to the end of 2006 and I am sad. Not simply sad for the state of the country, but for the state of our humanity, as Iraqis. We’ve all lost some of the compassion and civility that I felt made us special four years ago. I take myself as an example. Nearly four years ago, I cringed every time I heard about the death of an American soldier. They were occupiers, but they were humans also and the knowledge that they were being killed in my country gave me sleepless nights. Never mind they crossed oceans to attack the country, I actually felt for them.

Had I not chronicled those feelings of agitation in this very blog, I wouldn’t believe them now. Today, they simply represent numbers. 3000 Americans dead over nearly four years? Really? That’s the number of dead Iraqis in less than a month. The Americans had families? Too bad. So do we. So do the corpses in the streets and the ones waiting for identification in the morgue.

Is the American soldier that died today in Anbar more important than a cousin I have who was shot last month on the night of his engagement to a woman he’s wanted to marry for the last six years? I don’t think so.

Just because Americans die in smaller numbers, it doesn’t make them more significant, does it?

– posted by river @ 1:00 PM

What does America have to gain by damaging Iraq to this extent?  Check out the portion of the Iraq Study Group’s report on privitizing Iraqi oil.  The real question is: What do American oil companies have to gain, and who receives the proceeds of those ill-gotten gains?

Barbara

End of a Era for “VT Yankee Republicans”

Knocking on doors in Vermont, you are bound to run across some folks that are smart, informed, concerned, reasonable… and then you find out that they are Republicans! Throws ya for a loop, it does.

It struck me over the past few days with the passing of Sen. Stafford, retirement of Sen. Jeffords and even Pres. Ford’s passing that this might also be a passing of an era for VT Republicans. Not the elected ones, but the regular folk.

They are grounded on economic matters, tolerant on social issues, and compassionate about helping neighbors genuinely in need. They want a government that is frugal and efficient in the best Yankee tradition. They don’t want to go butting into everyone’s personal business, and they especially don’t want anyone preaching to them about what they should and should not do with their lives.

What stuck with me was the realization that, more and more in the country and now even in VT, the elected Repubs speak for a party that does not represent these people. Stafford did. Jeffords did. For some of them, Bernie does on populist economic issues. I don’t think Douglas speaks for these folks though. Dubie… I do think that his down-home, plain-spoken thing connects with this block and was a big part of his success. But the governor and certainly the national party have disconnected with these VT “Stafford/Jeffords” R’s.

Got me thinking about if there were any potential Dems who could tap into this neglected constituency in the next Gubernatorial race. Going by the most prestegious source I could find, the GMD Governor’s Poll, here’s some quick thoughts on the top potential candidates, just in regards to this open voting block opportunity and their ability to tap into it.

Parker: I think he can connect with these folks. He’s got the quiet moral integrity, might be a little to wonkish on the issues though?

Dunne: It could be hard for Matt taking advantage of this angle because his personal style is just so darned polished, but he has to be making inroads with his community service approach.

Markowitz: I don’t really know her that well or her style so its hard for me to say, but I do think she has developed a reputation for competency and just plain getting the job done in the SOS office that would help.

Spaulding: He’s got a beard and his name is Jeb, that’s a good start. He’s a pretty down to earth guy. Have to see how his policies would take shape.

Symington: Another one I don’t know well. As Speaker, will VT’ers think she’s more suited to insider politics? That’s my first, uninformed thought.

Tracy: Strikes me as an sharp, effective pol who takes a stand for what he thinks, not a natural connection with this block but could possibly work into one.

Sorrell: Doesn’t seem like a guy who would be a good match here, seems more… sophisticated or something. Can he connect?

Shumlin: I don’t think so, always sounds to me like he’s lecturing folks.

Again, this commentary is only in relation to the observation I had about there being a potential block of neglected Stafford/Jeffords Rep’s out there, not on these folks’ overall strengths as Dem candidates. AND, that’s my view from way outside the Montpelier beltway, feel free to add your own thoughts of course.

Looking at it from this angle, I think Parker is best suited to expand the base into this Yankee bloc. Anyone else not mentioned yet that ties into this line of thinking for you?

Capital Press Bureau? Gawd Help Us

Listen, I don’t know whether it’s kosher to comment on another blog here, but, really, the PoliticsVT entry (Part II) on why Tarrant and Rainville failed is nothing more than barely literate blame shifting from their own bad strategy (or lack of any strategy). And these folks are somehow related to the Capital Press Bureau? Oh please, say it ain’t so!

Whoever posted this stuff is just a Republican Party apologist who can’t spell and doesn’t know how to use a spellchecker.

And the awful thing is that I heard something not as blatant, but bad enough on Vermont Public Radio on one of their end-of-year news roundups. Essentially they said that Rainville lost because it was a bad year for Republicans. Nothing about Welch’s name recognition from a previous statewide race. Nothing about superior strategy run by Carolyn Dwyer …

Sheesh.

NanuqFC