Daily Archives: December 26, 2006

Top Vermont News Stories of the Year

The Times Argus AP (thanks for the catch, Nat) has its list of the top 10 stories of 2006 out. Some are rather broad categories of stories (“congress race,” “Vermont Yankee”), some are clearly news stories that belong on such a list (“Cashman controversy,” “school shooting,” “Fell sentenced”), while the “tire burn” story probably doesn’t belong in the top ten, in my own opinion.

All told, though, some significant news stories probably should’ve been on that list – or at the very least, should be mentioned in the same strata. Here then, are what I believe to be the top 10 stories not included on the AP’s list (not necessarily in order of prominence or priority). Some of them were big splash items, while some simply did not receive the attention they probably should have, but were significant events whose impact may be underestimated or underappreciated by the traditional media.

And by all means, use the comments to add your own as well… (continued on the flip)

1. Spec. Chris Merchant of Hardwick, Sgt. Josh Johnson of Richford, Sgt. Carlton Clark of South Royalton and Lance Cpl. Kurt Dechen of Springfield are killed in the Iraq War, bringing the total number of Vermonters killed in Iraq to 18, with an escalation of tens of thousands of troops virtually guaranteed to be proposed by Bush and supported by GOP leading Presidential contender John McCain.

2. The Vermont Impeachment Movement. Two grassroots efforts simultaneously spread across the state – both of which garnered major media attention nationwide and galvanized activism leading into the elections, energizing the anti-war movement from coast to coast. Starting with Dan DeWalt in Newfane, multiple Vermont Towns have passed Town Meeting Resolutions calling for the impeachment of the President. Simultaneously, Jeff Taylor of Clarendon drafts language calling on the Vermont legislature to use its authority to initiate impeachment proceedings, and that draft sweeps through Democratic Town and County Committee meetings statewide. When some members of the Dem leadership ralied to narrowly defeat the measure at the State level (in a still-controversial vote), nearly a dozen Democratic Progressive and Independent State Representatives signed on to Progressive Rep. David Zuckerman’s similar bill in the Statehouse. Both the Town Meeting and Legislative efforts continue in close alignment.

3. GOP Senate Candidate Rich Tarrant spends more per vote than any other candidate in US History. This of course being the eye-catching tagline of the greater story of the huge amounts of money now being spent in Vermont on these races and the end of statewide elections as we’ve previously known them.

4. Auditor’s race reversed in recount. Such a thing has never happened before. Who says your vote doesn’t matter? Congratulations again, Auditor-elect Tom Salmon Jr.

5. Vermont Peace Activists spied on by US Government. Although it originally broke last December, the issue played out over the first three months of this year. One of those stories of huge import and potentially monumental implications, yet the coverage was tepid and the follow-up perfunctory. At least Senator Leahy was properly pissed off.

6. Catamount Health. It sort of blows my mind that the AP left this off their list. The issue of health care was where it belongs in 2006 – front and center. Unfortunately, it also sucked the air out of the room for many other issues. The compromise with the Governor was not the systemic overhaul envisioned by the House bill in 2005, but a safety net for most completely uninsured Vermonters. Called the most extensive reform in the nation, it was still a mighty disappointment for progressives (li’l ‘p’, natch), and made it difficult for Scudder Parker’s gubernatorial campaign to get any traction on the greater issue. Although serious doubts about the long-term sustainability of the plan loom, the Democratic Legislative leadership made a deliberate decision to not let the perfect (true reform) stand in the way of the good (covering tens of thousands without health care). In any event, the train-wreck that is the US health care system keeps piling up.

7. The Vermont Milk Company launches. Largely overlooked by the media (I suspect because it gets into a level of economics that makes many reporters’ and readers’ eyes glaze over), the VT Milk Company is the culmination of a long effort by Anthony Pollina and others to take control of a corner of the dairy production market in order to give local dairy farmers better prices. As the Catamount Health system was for health care, VT Milk doesn’t get at the root causes of the steady decline of the dairy industry in Vermont which are systemic to the global market. Again, it doesn’t let the perfect become the enemy of the good – which in this case means allowing farmers to begin to take some small measure of control of the production and offer stabalized prices on the higher end of what is commercially viable at present. Again -as with Catamount – issues of long-term sustainability linger.

8. Warming trend. Nationally, six of the first nine months of the year were much warmer than average. Going into fall globally, September was the 4th warmest recorded. Locally, November of 06 had the lowest snowfall ever in Vermont. And then there was the Green Christmas. Anybody see a pattern?

9. Instant Runoff Voting used in Burlington mayoral race. And very successfully by most accounts. Expect the issue of election reform to be revisited and the Burlington election to be the first of many.

10. Blogs impact Vermont statewide elections. Julie Waters broke the now-famous Rainville plagiarism story – which is coming to be seen by many as a watershed event in the Congressional election. The genie of the blogosphere is now out of the bottle in Vermont, and expect big-ticket statewide elections to never be the same again.

Your turn. What’s I miss?

Why John Edwards Should Be The Democratic Nominee in 2008

This post might also be tittled, “Why Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama should not be the Democratic nominee for President in 2008.”

Hillary Clinton is accomplished and smart. The fact that she is female, I believe, is an asset to her political ambitions.

She can raise money.

As First Lady, she survived (even thrived?) the level of scrutiny that candidates for President endure from a international press corps. In 08′, only McCain and Edwards have had their personal closets rooted through so thoroughly.

If Hillary were to run she would have the greatest Democratic strategist of her generation, Bill Clinton, as her campaign manager. No one is better than Bubba (but a few are equal).

It doesn’t matter.

If Hillary 08′ really makes a run for it, and I do not think she does (exploratory campaigns do not count), she would take the Northeast and West Coast states.

That does not take her to the 270 electoral votes that she needs to be President.

To crack 270 she has to pick up electoral votes in the Great Lakes-Mississippi River region, the near West and Southwest, Pennsylvania and/or Florida.

She won’t.

Hillary, love her or hate her, has 100% name ID nationwide. In all 50 states her favorable/unfavorable are set in stone.

There is nothing (and I mean NOTHING) that you, me, the guy walking his dog down the street will see/read/hear about Hillary that will make them change their mind about her. That goes for the people that love her as well as the people who despise her.

It does not matter who the Republican nominee is (sorry John McCain). Hillary doesn’t get to 270. The electoral math just doesn’t add up in the battleground states.

The Democratic Party would be foolish to let her run because if she runs, she will get the nomination and is guaranteed to lose the general.

She would even beat Barack Obama for the Democratic nomination, which is a shame because I really like Barack Obama.

Not that it matters because Brack Obama isn’t going to be President in 08′.

Not yet.

It’s not that he’s black. This country is most likely ready for a black President.

Its not that he’s not smart enough. Obama is really smart. I mean, really, really smart. And telegenic and articulate, which are both key ingredients of the modern presidency.

It’s because Obama doesn’t really stand for anything. Not yet. He’s too young.

We love Obama because he is fresh and so unlike 99% of our other politicians. We like him because he is honest (stupid land deals in Illinois aside). We like him because he seems to be the most like us.

Which is the problem. Obama-mania is really all about us (its always about us, we’re Americans). We project our hopes and dreams upon him because, by standing for nothing in particular, Obama stands for everything. Like us.

Standing for everything is very dangerous under the white hot lights of a Presidential campaign. Standing for everything is not a winning campaign strategy.

And, as my very good friend Mark Halperin said, “If you animate forces who do not feel a strong enough bond with you, the mob that had your back can become the mob at your door.”

Just ask Howard Dean.

Which leaves us with John Edwards. And, to be honest, he’s not a bad choice for the Democrats in 08′.

In fact, he is a pretty cagey choice. If the Democrats would only wake up and smell the coffee.

Edwards is very smart, as smart as Hillary and Obama.

Edwards can raise money. Maybe not with the ease of Hillary and Obama, but he will raise enough to be competitive.

America already knows about his skeletons and Edwards knows that we know. He survived 04”s election scrutiny with his reputation relatively intact. This is a huge advantage.

Edwards is able to get to 270 electoral votes. This automatically makes him better than Hillary.

Edwards is already laying campaign groundwork in the key states. He is picking up staff, volunteers and endorsements so much so that he feels comfortable announcing his candidacy next week – well before Hillary and Obama.

But, what I like most about Edwards is his campaign platform – “The Two Americas”.

Very cagey. Very kitchen-table oriented.

When Edwards talks about the gulf between the haves and the have nots, he makes people believe that he is going to do something about it.

Edwards’ campaign is going to resonate.

Let’s hope that the Democratic Party is smart enough to pay attention.