Ed Shamy has a great column in this morning’s Free Press, although in my humble opinion he doesn’t go far enough.

It’s all about the story that two Vermont border guards are charged with making false reports when they caught a marijuana smuggler and decided to “turn” him, let him go, and prepared false documents to substantiate their story. They’re now facing federal charges, and the theory of the feds seems to be that it’s okay when the feds decide to make up the same kind of lie, but not okay when the lowly border guards do it on their own.

Today’s column amply examines the pattern of lies, falsification of documents, and phony press reports that, in the view of the prosecution, were legitimate police tactics in an earlier case, but which the prosecution is condemning in the case at bar. Shamy makes great points, especially when we get to lies that made their way into the local papers. Whenever the government breaks the law or lies to the public we can assume they think it’s for a good reason, but the Bush administration has shown us where the pattern of lies and deceiption leads.

What’s missing in the press so far, though, is a real examination of the root causes of this situation. It’s time for us all to recognize that it is the failed policy of drug prohibition that has given rise to widespread police corruption, millions of people, mostly minorities, in prison, and the devastation of communities across the country.

Following the action of legislators in California and Illinois – which in turn followed the grassroots activism of Vermonters – legislation calling for the impeachment of George Bush under Section 603 of the Jefferson Manual will be introduced to the Vermont State Legislature Tuesday or Wednesday at the latest.

As first reported in this diary and this one at Green Mountain Daily, and subsequently picked up by The Nation and others, Rep. David Zuckerman (P-Burlington) has retrofitted his previous call for impeachment with the language of the “Rutland Resolution.” Current co-sponsors include Represenetatives Steve Green, George Cross, Daryl Pillsbury, Kathy Pellett, Dexter Randall, Michael Fisher, Jim McCullough, Winston Dowland, Ann Seibert and Chris Pearson, making it a true bipartisan (Progressive and Democrat) action. It is no small step for these Dems to buck the wishes of leadership to avoid the issue. One wonders if it is at least in some way a reflection of frustration at the quiet abandonment of some more lefty legislation such as Instant Runoff Voting and the study on the Iraq debacle’s effect on the VT National Guard.

Chances for passage of the legislation this session at such a late date are slim (as are the chances for the comparable California and Illinois resolutions), but it is still a tremendous vindication for supporters who are committed to pushing the legislation next session if need be.

The complete text of the legislation follows the link. You can also check California talk radio’s “Peter Collins Show” for an archived mp3 of Rep. Zuckerman’s appearence with Rep. Yarbrough of Illinois who introduced the Illinois version.

Whereas, Section 603 of the Manual of the Rules of the U.S. House of Representatives provides for impeachments to be initiated on a motion based on charges transmitted from a state legislature, and
Whereas, President George W. Bush has served as the 44th President of the United States since January 20, 2001, and

Whereas, his profound disregard for the fundamental principles of the United States Constitution, including the rule of law and the separation of powers, has only worsened in recent months, and

Whereas, George W. Bush has committed high crimes and misdemeanors as he has repeatedly and intentionally violated the United States Constitution and other laws of the United States, particularly the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and the Torture Convention, which under Article VI of the Constitution is a treaty as part of the “supreme law of the land,” and

Whereas, George W. Bush has acted to strip Americans of their constitutional rights by ordering indefinite detention of citizens, without access to legal counsel, without charge, and without opportunity to appear before a civil judicial officer to challenge the detention, based solely on the discretionary designation by the President of a U.S. citizen as an “enemy combatant,” all in subversion of law, and

Whereas, George W. Bush has ordered and authorized the attorney general to override judicial orders for the release of detainees under U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (formerly INS) jurisdiction, even though the judicial officer after full hearing has determined that a detainee is held wrongfully by the government, and

Whereas, on more than 30 occasions, George W. Bush has ordered the National Security Agency to intercept and otherwise record international telephone and other signals and communications by American citizens without warrants from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review, duly constituted by Congress in 1978, and has designated certain U.S. citizens as “enemy combatants,” all in violation of constitutional guarantees of due process, and

Whereas, notwithstanding the President’s reliance on the 2001 Congressional resolution authorizing his “use of all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed or aided the terrorists attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001,” many legal scholars and members of Congress from both political parties have criticized the domestic surveillance activity as being in direct violation of the Fourth Amendment and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (Act), and

Whereas, George W. Bush has admitted that he willfully and repeatedly violated the Act and boasted that he would continue to do so, each violation constituting a felony, and
Whereas, the Act requires obtaining a warrant from a federal court that sits in secret session as a prerequisite to the conduct of domestic intelligence surveillance activities, and

Whereas, the Act even includes a provision providing for a 72-hour period after a domestic surveillance action has occurred for a federal official to obtain a retroactive warrant, and
Whereas, in the nearly 18 years since the Act’s court’s creation, only a miniscule number of requests for a warrant has been refused, and

Whereas, if, despite the extensive leeway the Act provides for the conduct of a domestic intelligence surveillance action and the strong inclination of the FISA court to grant nearly every federal request for a warrant, the administration still believes the Act is not responsive to the new digital technology that was not available in 1978, it could have sought an amendment to the law, and

Whereas, the repeated constitutional and statutory violations that are manifested in the domestic spying program leave Congress no alternative but to commence an impeachment proceeding, now therefore be it

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives:

That the General Assembly submits that President Bush’s actions and admissions constitute ample grounds for his impeachment, and that the General Assembly has good cause for submitting charges to the U.S. House of Representatives under Section 603 of the Manual of the Rules of the U.S. House of Representatives as grounds for George W. Bush’s impeachment and be it further

Resolved:  That the General Assembly urges the U.S. House Judiciary Committee to initiate presidential impeachment hearings as quickly as reasonably possible, and be it further

Resolved:  That the secretary of state be directed to send a copy of this resolution to Representatives F. James Sensenbrenner Jr. and John Conyers Jr., the chair and the ranking member of the U.S. House Committee on the Judiciary, and to the Vermont Congressional Delegation.