The GMD Democratic Gubernatorial Primary Questionnaire: What You Asked the Candidates (pt 1)



Way back in July of last year, we posted a diary entitled Primary voters: What would you ask the candidates?. There were a lot of great suggestions in the comments, as well as a few that came over email.

If you all thought that the whole idea had fallen victim to GMD short attention spans, I’m happy to say that once it became clear who the candidates in the Democratic primary were going to be, we got to work. We took the questions we did receive, reviewed them (massaging or combining them when appropriate) and sent them off to Senators Bartlett, Racine & Shumlin, Secretary of State Markowitz and former Senator Dunne. Last night, we received their responses.

There is a lot of material covered in these (returned questionnaires are from 7-14 pages long), so we’re going to trickle out the responses over the course of the week. The first set of responses are contained in the diary below.

A note on formatting before clicking on the extended entry. The questions were presented under general categories. Some candidates’ responded question by question. Other times candidates would take all the questions under a given category and write a collective response encompassing all the questions. In some categories, candidates would respond by combining some questions and not others.

As such, the questionnaires are presented as follows: under each category, all the questions we asked are listed as bullets. At the end of each category, the candidates’ complete answers are presented (in alphabetical order by candidate). If the candidate answered each specific question, their answers are numbered accordingly. If their answers are not numbered, that indicates a generalized response to all the questions collectively.

So please follow us below the flip for the candidates’ responses to the GMD questionnaire categories ENERGY and JOBS & ECONOMY. Then come back on Wednesday and again on Friday for questions on a wide variety of other topics. (On deck for Wednesday, responses to questions on permitting, agriculture, health care and education)

ENERGY

  • What are the long and short term priorities that Vermont’s next Governor must take to protect Vermont’s energy future and to protecting Vermont’s rate payers relative to sourcing the State’s energy?  What steps will you take to move Vermont toward an efficient grid system that encourages innovative energy use by consumers and facilitates innovative energy production by both small and large renewable sources?
  • What will you do help make Vermont capable of producing most of the energy it needs?
  • What is your stand on closing the aging and deteriorating Entergy nuclear power plant?

    Under what conditions would you consider keeping it open?

    If you would consider keeping it open, what is the longest period you can envision this deteriorating liability to continue its operation?
  • With the Douglas/Dubie administration’s assistance, Entergy has irresponsibly been allowed to dismiss a clean-up liability, estimated to be in the hundreds of millions of dollars. Currently, the clean up liability is on the backs of Vermont rate-payers.  Clean up liability for Entergy is a goal, but in the meantime, Vermont rate payers own that problem.  What can and will you do to require Entergy to assume its clean up responsibility, fully fund its neglected decommissioning fund and protect Vermonters from the financial consequences of Entergy’s inability to clean up its Vernon site and store/dispose of its nuclear waste?


SUSAN BARTLETT:

1. & 2. In the short term:

  • We must renew our contract with Hydro Quebec.
  • Efficiency Vermont is very successful and must be expanded through public/private partnership.
  • The biomass cogeneration projects in Montpelier and Bennington are exciting projects that move in the right direction
  • Many of our schools use local wood to generate heat. We should look to use those plants to make electricity as well.
  • Require that new commercial and residential building, as well as major renovations, be energy efficient and develop on-site energy where possible.

In the long term:

  • We have funding from the federal government to build a smart grid that will help Vermonters to know when power is cheaper during off-peak times as well as how much power they are using.
  • I would like to investigate getting power from the dams on the Connecticut River.
  • We have renewable power projects in the works like the solar farm in Pownal and wind generation that will come one line in the next few years.
  • Some estimates say that we can get 16% of our electricity from upgrading our existing dams and this should be explored.
  • We have to continue to improve efficiency; the least expensive power is the power we never need to generate.   Electricity is only 18% of our carbon footprint. Most of our energy use is from burning fossil fuel for heating and transportation. As we find renewable ways to generate electricity, we have to use more of it to warm our buildings and run our transportation system.
  • The cost of generating renewable power will go down with time. We need to continue to invest in the technology to generate power close to where it will be used.

3. With the developments of the last few weeks, I think it is impossible to see a path in which Vermont Yankee will be allowed to remain open.

4. The legislature has twice passed a bill making it clear that in the original sales deal with Entergy, they were responsible for the clean up.  I voted for the bill twice,  and as Governor would sign that bill if sent to my desk.

MATT DUNNE:

Vermont’s energy future is a critical challenge for the next Governor in both the short and long term.

Since I ran statewide in 2006, I have been calling for the organized decommissioning of Vermont Yankee in 2012 as planned. Today, with evidence that Entergy officials misled regulators and that the facility is leaking radioactive waste into our groundwater, the debate should end.  We now need to move quickly to transition workers to new jobs, hold Entergy fully accountable, and begin to replace the electricity created at VY with in-state renewable sources and improved energy efficiency. We owe it to all ratepayers to take action now in order to avoid disruptions and price volatility.

My administration will do everything possible to hold Entergy, as a corporation, accountable for the complete and total cleanup of the Vernon site. Now that there appears to be radioactive contamination, my understanding is that the EPA will get involved and Entergy will be fully liable, especially when it is clear that they misled regulators. I look forward to working with the Attorney General and the federal government to protect the health of Vermonters and our environment.

As Governor I will initiate the following for a strong energy future:

  • Facilitate the development of at least two 75-megawatt biomass facilities in Vermont, located in Windham County and the Northeast Kingdom.
  • Encourage wind power development, solar development and micro-hydro by having ANR proactively assist with such projects, increasing the cap on the feed-in-tariff and expanding incentives for residential solar, wind and efficiency.
  • Expand the PACE program to potentially allow individuals who invest in near-zero-energy buildings to be paid for the reduction in demand.
  • Invest in further efficiency measures to reduce overall demand.
  • Make it a right for all Vermonters to know their electrical use in real time through smart meter deployment, encouraging the reduction of energy use through knowledge and a sense of competition with buildings of similar size.
  • Encourage co-generation opportunities and district heating/cooling using biomass and geo thermal.
  • Pilot the first electric car grid to reduce cost and carbon emission of car-dependent Vermont commuters.
  • Walk the walk by using bonded dollars to install renewable energy systems in all of our state buildings.
  • Invest in rail to encourage the more efficient transportation of goods, business travelers and, potentially, commuters with a specific emphasis on reconnecting passenger rail service to Burlington by connecting through Essex and on the western side of the state.

DEB MARKOWITZ:

1. & 2. Vermont is at an energy crossroads: contracts for two-thirds of Vermont’s electricity are expiring within five years; we have an aging nuclear plant within our borders; because of our rural communities Vermonters use more gas for driving than average Americans. In addition, Vermont has some of the oldest and least energy efficient housing stock in the country with long heating seasons. We send over $2 billion out of state despite these high energy needs because we only support 10 percent of our energy from local production.

As Governor I will provide the strong leadership we need to ensure that we have access to clean, safe, secure, and affordable energy today into the future.

I will create a long-term plan to generate clean energy in Vermont to fuel the state far into the future. For the short-term, I will invest in energy efficiency, removing barriers for Vermonters to retrofit their homes and businesses.  This is a win-win approach as investments in efficiency create jobs, save Vermont families and businesses money on heat and electric bills and reduce Vermont’s contribution to global warming. New recovery act investments in a smart grid will allow Vermont families and businesses to monitor their own energy use.  This will be a great way to save money and reduce our need for new energy investments.

I will harness the efforts of our Federal delegation to ensure that Vermont leads the nation in the manufacture and use of new energy technologies.  Vermont already has some of the fastest growing renewable energy businesses in the country.  I am a strong supporter of community wind projects, hydropower, solar, biomass and geothermal energy production.  As Governor I will review our regulatory process to ensure that renewable energy projects get a fair hearing and fast results.

We also have a great opportunity to bring low cost power to Vermont from Hydro-Quebec.  Hydro-Quebec wants to bring its power to the rest of New England and we already have transmission lines in place that could be upgraded to serve this purpose in exchange for a long term low cost power contract.

As Governor I will find creative solutions to meet public transportation needs of Vermonters and I will support investments in rail to help our businesses get their goods to market more efficiently and to provide more transportation options for Vermonters.  We must make it a priority to get trains running to Burlington once again.

New energy investments in Vermont cannot happen overnight. But they will not happen at all without a governor who commits to the strategy we will know is essential to a cleaner planet, a growing economy and a more secure world. Tackling Vermont’s energy future will require creative collaborations among public officials, businesses, citizen groups, environmentalists and others. I will bring the stakeholders to the table and generate a plan that will succeed.

3. Vermont Yankee should not be relicensed.  Last week’s news of radioactive leaks from Vermont Yankee brings into clear focus the safety risks we cannot afford to take with our aging nuclear plant. Job creation and retention is critical for Vermont, but safety must be our first concern.

It seems like every few months there is a news story about a mishap at the plant – collapsing cooling towers, failure to monitor high level radioactive waste, leaks of radioactive steam. Entergy officials even gave inaccurate information under oath to the Vermont Public Service Board about underground pipes now leaking the radioactive isotope tritium into groundwater flowing into the Connecticut River. This raises serious questions about trust in Entergy’s representations about the plant’s safety and its ability to operate for an additional twenty years.

We should all urge the legislature to vote no and vote now!  

4. In addition to having grave concerns about the safety of Vermont Yankee I am opposed to the proposed spin off company – Enexus.  While I could see how it might be attractive to Entergy to create an under-resourced holding company for its aging nuclear power plants I do not see how this could benefit Vermont ratepayers.  We must keep in mind that the decommissioning fund has a current shortfall of almost $600 million (and this is without taking into account the increased costs of clean up that will result from the most recent tritium leaks) so we must take appropriate steps to protect Vermont ratepayers.

As governor I will ensure that there is proper Federal oversight and that clean up and decommissioning of Vermont Yankee does not cost Vermonters a dime. The Agency of Natural Resources and the Health Department will also be involved to ensure that cool down and clean up are conducted in ways that protect the health and safety of Vermonters and our environment.

DOUG RACINE:

How Vermont will meet its future energy demands will be one of the most critical questions facing Vermonters in the coming years. I am opposed to the continued operation of Vermont Yankee after 2012. This plant should be shut down as planned in 2012 – for financial and moral reasons. Financially, Entergy has given no guarantees that they will pay the costs of either decommissioning the plant or storing the nuclear waste materials, and I have no confidence we won’t get stuck with those bills. Morally, I simply do not think it is right to saddle our grandchildren, their grandchildren and generations of Vermonters to come with the costs of decommissioning and storing our nuclear waste. We don’t have a solution for it, and we must stop producing more.

It would be irresponsible to call for the closing of Vermont Yankee without acknowledging the void it will leave behind. Yankee supplies approximately 1/3 of the state’s power. We can fill that gap through a combination of conservation, improved efficiency and new, renewable sources of power. First, we need to reduce our energy demand by promoting efficiency in all aspects of our lives. We need stronger incentives for the construction of more efficient homes and businesses. As a state, we should be investing in smart grid and smart metering technology, so that we can all be better informed and wiser about our energy use.

At the same time we focus on our efficiency, as Governor I will be a strong supporter of programs to encourage the development and use of renewable energy sources. I support both wind and solar power development, as well as biomass. Local communities that choose to host these sources of power should benefit first. Solar and wind power are safe, clean, and increasingly reliable sources of power, and I believe Vermont should lead the rest of the nation in the percentage of its power supply coming from these renewable sources.

PETER SHUMLIN:

1. The next governor must find a way to replace Vermont Yankee’s power with affordable, clean energy.  How do we do it?  The answer is clear when you consider what our region has to offer.  The New England ISO’s 2008 forecast demonstrates that the region will have nearly twice the capacity necessary to meet the demand of the six New England states now and in the years to come.  There is a diverse menu of options available, including natural gas, hydro, wind, solar, biomass and accelerated energy efficiency.

Vermont Yankee delivers just 2 percent of New England’s power.  Natural gas, hydroelectric power and other renewable energy sources offer reliable, well-priced options. Vermont must take full advantage of these regional options in the short term, while aggressively developing local sources of renewable power that will ensure a stable and sustainable energy supply into the future.

In the long term, we need leadership that will help Vermont become a leader in energy efficiency and renewable energy development – something we are uniquely positioned to do.  We are home to some of the leading clean energy entrepreneurs. We have Vermonters who are hungry for a new direction, including more than 90 community energy groups across the state that are undertaking creative energy-saving and renewable generating projects. We have a congressional delegation that is helping our communities access the funds they need.  Combine this with more smart grid technology and Vermont is well on its way to showing the world that the United States can wean itself from dirty, dwindling and expensive fossil fuels and realize an energy future based on clean, local, renewable energy supplies.

2. As governor, I will promote a strong, renewable energy economy in Vermont that takes into account the values and priorities of our communities and doesn’t compromise our natural resources.  Responsibly developing our own renewable energy generation is a critical component to Vermont’s successful economic development.  It will grow businesses, create well paying jobs, save Vermonters money and get us off our addiction to oil.  

As governor, I will ensure that our utilities and municipalities have the means to develop our local energy future.  One of the biggest hurdles renewable energy faces is the upfront cost.  We should not rely on Wall Street to finance our clean energy future when we have the local will and resources to create the future we want to leave for the next generation of Vermonters.

3. Vermont Yankee should not be relicensed to operate beyond 2012.  First, the corporate spin-off from our current well-financed owner, Entergy, to the debt-ridden shell corporation, Enexus, is fiscally irresponsible and extremely unwise.  Second, the decommissioning fund shortfall of almost $600 million leaves Vermont taxpayers on the hook to clean up the plant and its nuclear waste.  Third, the price offered by Enexus (6.1 cents) for only 115MV, is a nearly 50 percent increase over our current price (4.2 cents), and would force Vermonters to pay more for less power.

4. Entergy must not be allowed to spin Vermont Yankee off to Enexus.  If approved, the spin-off will leave the plant and the decommissioning fund in the hands of a debt ridden, highly leveraged, out of state company.

The recent news that Vermont Yankee is leaking radioactive material makes the decommissioning question even more concerning.  While we do not know the extent of the radioactive contamination, it could potentially double the costs of decommissioning.  While Governor Douglas and Lt. Governor Dubie have asked the Department of Public Service to postpone its support for the spin-off, Speaker Shap Smith and I have made it clear that postponing support is not enough – the department should oppose the spin-off proposal.  


JOBS & ECONOMY:

  • How do you propose to further enhance and support existing and start up companies and the small businesses?
  • What is your top priority to improve the work & employment conditions for Vermont workers and how would you strengthen the job market and job opportunities for Vermonters as well as the job creation opportunities of Vermont businesses.
  • What changes would you make, if any, to the current system of economic incentives and tax breaks in our state for businesses and individuals?


SUSAN BARTLETT:

Business creates jobs. State government can only create the environment to make it easier. I would fund all of the regional development corporations so they could do their job – creating jobs in their region of the state.  

The next most important issue for small businesses is access to capitol.  While our Vermont banks have money to lend and their commercial lending is growing, the increased regulation from DC is making it harder and harder for them to lend to small, new businesses.  

We need to fund the Seed Capital program that we began last year and we need to make sure that VEDA (Vermont Economic Development Authority) is well-funded.   They currently can lend to small businesses and they can make agricultural loans that I believe will become more and more important as we “grow” our agricultural economy.

We have in place a very good job-training program that is always over-subscribed by the business community.   It is important to make sure that working Vermonters have access to the job training they need to move up the jobs skills ladder.  

I believe that the performance-based tax credits like the Vermont Employment Growth Incentive works.  I understand that many folks don’t believe in tax credits, I happen to believe that we have developed a transparent and accountable credit that can work well.

I believe that encouraging the model of having employees own their business is well worth pursuing, we know that those jobs will stay in Vermont.

I have written several articles that relate to fostering an environment where Vermonters create, attain and keep good jobs. It is my number one focus.

http://www.bartlettforgovernor…

http://www.bartlettforgovernor…

http://www.bartlettforgovernor…

http://www.bartlettforgovernor…

http://www.bartlettforgovernor…

MATT DUNNE:

Jobs and economic development must be the top priority of the next administration. Vermont has always been at its best as an innovation state, whether it was machine tool in Springfield, scales in St. Johnsbury, or JogBras and ice cream in Burlington. My ancestors started one of the first kit-home manufacturing businesses in the Northeast Kingdom and a veneer manufacturing plant that sold wood products to the world.  I’ve had the experiences of helping to grow an $18.5 million software company, Logic Associates in Wilder, Vermont. I’ve helped create jobs through the AmeriCorps*VISTA microenterprise initiatives. More recently, in my work for Google, I have seen the power of innovation on job creation in many communities.  My priorities for job creation would be the following:

  • Broadband – We must bring high-speed, fiber-optic broadband to the last mile of every community in Vermont. Logic Associates was founded in a barn and Google was started in a garage. Broadband is the electricity of our time and if we do not have broadband to the barn and the garage, we will not have start-ups. Current employers are having difficulty recruiting young engineers because the home the potential employee could afford only has dial-up.
  • Invest in higher education tech transfer – We need to dramatically increase support to bring ideas from the classroom to the global marketplace.
  • Access to early stage capital – In 2004, as a Windsor County senator, I worked with business leaders across the state to put together a package of incentives to increase access to capital, including the Seed Capital Fund (recently renamed and finally deployed) and a capital gains tax deferral for individuals who took returns on early angel investments and immediately plowed that capital directly into new angel fund investments (the administration never publicized this opportunity and the legislature unfortunately chose to eliminate this incentive last year).  We can further expand incentives and direct investment to ensure entrepreneurs have additional access to capital throughout the state.
  • Micro-Enterprise – I would significantly increase the amount of economic development bonded authority to increase micro-enterprise loans, allowing low income Vermonters to achieve self-sufficiency by starting small businesses.
  • Seed entrepreneurs in high unemployment areas – My administration would look for creative ways to seed entrepreneurs in areas that are struggling economically. One proposal is to secure a downtown building that could be mixed loft space and incubator space, offer 20 two-year fellowships awarded on the basis of a national business start-up competition, with a percentage of any successful venture coming back to support the operation of the entrepreneurship center.  Such an initiative would attract private sector partners, be relatively inexpensive, and have a high potential to spin off new growth oriented businesses in depressed areas.
  • Evangelism – Once this infrastructure is in place, members of my administration will be evangelists to the world, attracting and retaining entrepreneurs who love Vermont’s environmental and community values.

Economic activities and investments in my administration will be held to a strong return on investment measurement. All incentives currently in place will be reviewed from scratch to ensure we are effectively using our resources in job creation.

In the workforce, my administration’s Department of Labor will be empowered to undertake enforcement of workers comp and employment rules.  We currently do not have a robust process for enforcing laws preventing abuses on either the worker or employer side.  The state should be sure that state contracts go to contractors who provide insurance and do not abuse contractor laws.

DEB MARKOWITZ:

1. It has been too long since Vermont’s leaders were as positive about our state’s future as our people always have been. As governor I will be the chief marketing officer for our state. Vermont is a great place to do business and no one in state government, especially the governor should say any differently.

Vermont has spent a lot of economic development effort and money trying to find large, out-of-state companies willing to relocate and create jobs in Vermont. This strategy was largely unsuccessful. To create jobs and rebuild our economy, we need to concentrate on Vermont businesses already here and ready to expand in the right environment. Many small businesses I talk to need capital to get them through these tough times or to allow them to make the strategic investments they need to expand.

Good roads and safe bridges remain important infrastructure but small businesses of today also need access to high speed internet. Even a small bed and breakfast needs a website and on line reservations in order to successfully compete in today’s economy.  The private sector has not gotten the job done, despite our current governor’s promise to get high speed internet to every home by 2007.  As governor I will forge the necessary public-private partnerships to get this job done.

2. As governor I will take a tough stand against misclassification of workers.  State government needs to consider this issue when it contracts with businesses and our labor department must take a tough stand when it comes to enforcement.

As a young mom, it was hard to find an employer that understood what working moms and dads need to succeed. I was lucky to go to work at the Vermont League of Cities and Towns that not only let me work part time, but I was allowed to bring my babies to work with me. Now, throughout Vermont, companies are changing their policies to make sure 21st century jobs include 21st century working conditions. Today’s work environments are increasingly more dynamic and that is a positive thing for productivity in our state. We know our employees are more productive and much more efficient when they are able to have flexible time to deal with a no-show babysitter or a visit to the pediatrician, or even to take a day on the slopes after a big snow. While I do not believe it is appropriate for government to mandate flexible work rules for private employers we do need to be sure we are enforcing existing laws like our Family and Medical Leave Act which guarantees parental leave and leave to take care of a sick family member.  

As governor I will not only be the chief marketing officer for Vermont products but I will also promote Vermont as a great place to live and work.  I have heard from some of our start-up to midsize technology companies that while great entry level employees are graduating from our colleges and universities,  more seasoned workers are hard to find. In fact, I spoke with one CEO that said she advertises on the California section of Monster.com because many job seekers do not think of Vermont as a technology hub. It is, and our economic development strategy should make sure technology jobs seekers are connected with innovative tech companies growing here everyday.

3. From day one my administration will ensure that our incentive programs focus first on Vermont businesses and that every one of those incentives will be measured for positive results. A cohesive and sound economic development plan needs to be created that coordinates federal, state, regional and local economic development efforts. Let’s agree on an economic development track and communicate with our businesses and new entrepreneurs so that every official from the Governor’s office to local selectboards and planning commissions understand creating jobs is our mission.

On the issue of taxation more generally, I am waiting with interest to see the results of Vermont Tax Structure Commission which will be presenting a structural analysis of the state’s tax system, and will be making recommendations for modernizing our current system.  As governor I will provide a long-term vision for the tax structure.  I believe in progressive taxes but also recognize that Vermont faces a unique challenge in that we are paying for the infrastructure of a state with the population of a small city.  Consequently, taxes like the gas tax make sense because they reach people who live beyond our borders but who are using our roads.

DOUG RACINE:

Vermont families are struggling, and I want every Vermonter to have the opportunity for a good-paying job with decent benefits. Job growth and retention will be the top priority of my administration. In this time of severe economic turmoil, it is essential for Vermont and Vermont leaders to focus on strengthening our business base to ensure job growth and creation. This can be accomplished, even in these difficult times, through strong leadership, wide participation and a focus on what is important for Vermonters and Vermont businesses.

Throughout this process I will focus on what Vermonters, including businesses both large and small have told me is critical to their success:

  • Quality of Life in Vermont
  • Quality of our State Infrastructure
  • Quality of our Workforce

From there, I will focus on our strengths: the green economy, renewable, high tech, and value-added agriculture. My administration will look for ways to help new businesses start up, and small businesses be successful – from working to offer funding to small businesses to working with these businesses to create job training programs targeted to their needs.

As governor, I will be directly involved in every phase of this economic development strategy. Selecting the right Secretary of Commerce and Community Development will be a top priority. I will be very hands-on with both current and prospective employers ensuring that we do everything possible to retain the jobs we have and create new jobs. This direct, continual, hands-on involvement will reinforce that every job is important.

Vermont needs a unified, coordinated and comprehensive workforce education and training system that includes development and delivery of a plan for both Vermonters and Vermont employers. This can be accomplished within the overall current funding levels if we structure the system properly and assign responsibility appropriately. Our current efforts are fragmented and do not focus on identifying direct need and then delivering solutions. My administration’s efforts will be focused on asking key employers what they need and focusing efforts there, in order to make sure Vermonters are ready to work in the green economy, agriculture, manufacturing, health care, travel and tourism and construction.

A statewide, universal and easily accessible broadband system is essential for Vermont. This will be an immediate and top priority of my administration. Vermont must invest in this infrastructure. As a rural state, we cannot rely on the private sector to provide this service – it is just not profitable given our small population. Instead, we must undertake an effort akin to the rural electrification project and ensure that all Vermonters have access to broadband that is reliable and affordable.

We also need to upgrade our rail system. Many Vermont businesses would benefit if we invested in the needed upgrades to make sure our rail system can carry the 286,000 pound railcars that are the standard now. Logging, agriculture, and manufacturing all depend on rail, and it is an important part of our economic infrastructure. An added benefit of upgrading our rail system is that it will take pressure off of our roads and bridges by reducing the number of trucks needed to haul goods to and from the state.

Tax policies and economic incentives can help Vermont retain, expand and attract jobs.  As governor, I will start my administration by subjecting our existing policies to rigorous analyses to determine which are working well and which are not, and to see where Vermonters are getting the greatest return on their tax dollar investments.

PETER SHUMLIN:

1. As a small business owner who has been meeting a payroll since I was 23 years old, I know that small businesses are the backbone of Vermont’s economy.  As I’ve traveled the state I have heard from employers who want to grown, but don’t have the capital to invest in new growth.  I’ve heard from employers who want to grow, but don’t have access to a workforce with the skills needed to produce their product.  We need to work with these business owners to remove these obstacles, so they can hire more Vermonters, expand their businesses in creative and innovative ways, and contribute to building a new economy.

Recently, Speaker Smith and I hosted a jobs forum at the State House where we heard from employers directly about the challenges and opportunities they face as they do business in Vermont.  Using what we learned from the forum we will craft an economic development bill – a jobs bill – that will make better partners of Vermont’s state government, its employers, and its job trainers.  I’m optimistic that this process will result in expanded opportunities for all Vermonters.

2. Creating jobs will be a top priority of my administration and as I discussed above state government needs to work with and support our small business owners to help them expand their businesses.

But we must also be ready to take advantage of the opportunities that will come as we move from our addiction to fossil fuels to renewable technology.  We are going to see an economic expansion in this country that will make the industrial revolution and recent technology boom yesterday’s story.

The transition will affect everything that we do; how we move around, where our food is grown and produced, how our electricity is generated, how we build our houses and schools; indeed every facet of our lives. Vermont is already on the forefront of much of this.  Our energy expertise, our food systems knowledge, our educated workforce, our land based entrepreneurial ventures, our colleges and universities; we already have a national reputation for innovation and we are well positioned to achieve more.  The question is will we have a governor who has the vision, courage and imagination to seize this opportunity?  I will be that governor and I will work 24/7 to ensure that Vermont leads in this new economy.

3. Tax incentives are used to attract and retain businesses that create jobs. As I’ve said, job creation will be a top priority of my administration.  Currently, we have a governor who travels the country announcing that Vermont is a bad place to do business.  Well, I disagree and as governor I will be a cheerleader for our state and all it has to offer.  The small business owners who call Vermont home and the companies looking to relocate here want to grow their businesses in our state because of our superior quality of life.  Our clean environment, our low crime rate, the ability to hike and swim in the summer and ski in the winter and our welcoming spirit are just a few of the many reasons people desire to live to here.  When we talk about job creation and retention our best selling point is Vermont’s quality of life.

4 thoughts on “The GMD Democratic Gubernatorial Primary Questionnaire: What You Asked the Candidates (pt 1)

  1. many thanks for taking the time–the questions were pointed enough to get some sense of how these guys really think, be it in crisp specifics or boilerplate generalities. thanks much

  2. I echo Bill’s comment on good journalism…. one can get a sense of the depth of thought each candidate gave to the questions.

    I was also impressed with the sensible approaches to the energy question but not so impressed with the order or lack of a sense of priorities.  Not that all of the approaches should not be done… but something needs to come first.

    As Chief Scientist Amory Lovins of the Rocky Mountain Institute often states, the ‘Negawatts’ from energy efficiency is the lowest hanging fruit on the tree with the quickest payback.  So increasing the funding for Efficiency Vermont to help retrofit more homes while providing a mixture of grants and loans to the Owners to entice them to make the investment in energy efficiency is a good one… two.  After all the state would be borrowing against future savings within a sensible projected payback period.

    But how about also accelerating the state energy code implementation and raising the bar on efficiency in them?

    While we are at it why not mandate implementation of Daylighting Design and Passive Solar techniques coupled with sensor and dimming controls, with new LED lamped fixtures for all new construction and the retrofitting of existing state buildings?  Talk about a construction boom in VT !

    Now Efficiency Vermont armed with grants and loans can help to entice the outdated and energy inefficient housing stock Owners.  But to help VT towns, cities and counties the state needs to get involved by providing block grant funding to put towards energy efficiency and generation.

    One last note… air-tight and energy efficient renovation and new construction work must be paired with fresh filtered air for good Indoor Environmental Quality.  If one seals up a building its just like putting a plastic bag over one’s head.  But poking a hole to breathe through defeats the purpose of energy efficiency.  There are a few technical solutions to this but don’t forget that we need to breathe fresh air and we must needs expend the small energy to temper that air too.

  3. of fresh air

    two of the candidates were very clear about their support for a rigorous review of existing policies and programs to determine their efficacy and cost-effectiveness; that would be a HUGE and positive change

    let’s hope that if elected they follow through (and insist on objective evaluations by people not affiliated with the agencies / programs being reviewed)

    of course there is no need for the legislature to wait for a new governor to adopt such a sensible approach to policy making…

Comments are closed.