BP      Jack McCullough      JulieWaters      kestrel9000      Maggie Gundersen      odum      Sue Prent 
                          

FairPoint Announces Chapter 11 - Wall Street v Main Street?

by: Maggie Gundersen

Mon Oct 26, 2009 at 12:58:11 PM EDT


FairPoint has Reached an Agreement with its Bank Lenders that will Restructure its Costs and Balance Sheet

As a leading provider of a full range of communications services, FairPoint Communications provides local and long distance voice, data service, Internet, television and broadband services. FairPoint operates 32 local exchange companies in 18 states with 1.7 million access lines. Like many companies, FairPoint has been impacted by the recent turmoil in the financial markets. As we have shared with many of our stakeholders, we have been working with our bank lenders to reduce our debt. We are pleased to announce FairPoint has succeeded in reaching a pre-arranged deal with our bank lenders that will reduce our debt in excess of $1.7 billion. We have entered Chapter 11 to implement this deal and restructure our costs and balance sheet. This is good news and we are confident that FairPoint will emerge as a much healthier and more viable company structured for future growth and profitability.  

To read the FairPoint's entire announcement, click http://www.fprestructuring.com/.

The International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) and Communication Workers of America (CWA) announced Friday that FairPoint was on the brink of bankruptcy.  

As the unions have consistently maintained, FairPoint's problems were caused primarily by its crushing debt and an organizational chaos that adversely affected revenues and operations.  Despite waging an all out campaign to oppose the sale, thousands of former Verizon workers have spent the last year-and-a-half working to make their new company succeed.
Maggie Gundersen :: FairPoint Announces Chapter 11 - Wall Street v Main Street?
According to the Maine Public Broadcasting Network:  
South Carolina-based FairPoint has been struggling since its $2.3 billion acquisition last year of Verizon Communications' landlines in Maine, New Hampshire and Vermont. Thousands of customers in all three states have lodged complaints about billing and service problems, and regulators in Vermont are considering pulling FairPoint's license to operate in that state.

FairPoint says the Chapter 11 filing, which must still be approved by a court, will reduce its annual interest costs from $200 million to $65 million. The company says it's current debt is now $2.7 billion, and the agreement will reduce it to $1 billion.

The CWA and IBEW, which represented 2,800 workers employed by Verizon in Maine, New Hampshire and Vermont, submitted lengthy legal briefs to State Regulators in opposition to the FairPoint sale.

Based on what we know at this point in time, the proposed sale of Verizon's properties in these states to FairPoint poses significant risks not only to our jobs and livelihoods but also to the economic health of our communities, both in terms of the quality of telephone services and the availability of truly high speed internet.

One of the key issues of the CWA and IBEW argument was that of a legal loophole called a Reverse Morris Trust, which CWA and IBEW claimed was being "used by Verizon to abandon its
customers and avoid taxes."

The "Reverse Morris Trust" is a tax-avoidance technique that, thanks to Wall
Street's financial wizards, is increasingly deployed by corporations seeking to sell off
unwanted assets without paying taxes on their gains.  It is a remnant of the once-
booming "disguised sale" transaction structure that many thought Congress had
largely eliminated in the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997.

Under a Reverse Morris Trust, a parent corporation can spin-off a subsidiary into an
unrelated company, tax free, if the shareholders of the parent end up controlling
more than 50% of the voting rights and economic value of the resulting merged
company.  As graphically described below, the basic elements of this process are:  
Corporation D spins off subsidiary Corporation C, which then merges into
Corporation A (an unrelated company); to qualify for tax-free treatment, Corporation
D's shareholders (and thus Corporation C's as well) must own a controlling interest
in the post-transaction Corporation A.

Typically, the parent loads up its "Spinco" with as much debt as it can support, while
causing this subsidiary to "dividend-out" or otherwise pay the proceeds of the new debt to
the parent or one of its affiliates immediately prior to the spin-off and merger.

Reverse Morris Trust,corporate tax loophole,FairPoint,Enexus

Tags: , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Regulators, shmegulators (4.00 / 2)
The regulatory agencies should have spiked this deal when the bait-and-switch financing plan (changing the bond interest rate from 8.125 to 13.125%) was revealed at the last minute.  Instead, they rolled over and rushed to approve the sale.

We all know the Vermont DPS (under OBrien) was a cheerleader rather than an advocate for customers.  I dont' expect that to change.


Thanks again, Public Service Board. (4.00 / 2)
So nice to know we can rely on your good judgment with regard to Vermont Yankee, too!

As I said ... (0.00 / 0)
No public money for telecoms ... unless it's public money we're talking about ...

Ignore the troll's remarks ... the post stands.

It's about community ... RAMABAHAMA DOT NET (only it is still under construction ... isn't that life?)


Not sure I understand... (0.00 / 0)
Rama,
Not sure I understand your original post or agree with your angle.

Yes, I think regulators should be on top of things with any public utilities: phone, internet, energy, water, etc.  I serve on Burlington's Public Works Commission in order to work for public access to good roads, sidewalks, services like recycling, and water.

I am a Burlington Telecom customer.  While I had some glitches with BT's service, they were finally straightened out, but it did take 2 months.  I did make both Jonathan Leopold and Chris Burns aware of the problems.  It took me a solid month of sleuthing to uncover that it was an internal BT issue and not an issue with my computer or the sites I was visiting.  

I have many questions about the original assumptions made for the BT business plan.  I asked those questions for several years prior to BT's rollout.  

I want BT to succeed.  I felt held captive with Comcast as my only available provider.  Now Comcast has many low rate deals, but we were scalped before they had to contend w/ BT.  My office counts upon BT for high-speed web service, and I count upon their telephone service as well.

My concern, and I believe Odum's concern in his original post Matters of Trust Part 2 read it here: revolve around the fact that a city has a fiduciary responsibility to its taxpayers and a moral responsibility to its electorate.

I am a firm believer in Open Government.  I believe that the government is the agent and advocate of the people, not their master.

I believe we have a smart city council who is asking the right questions as is the electorate.  It is imperative to find solutions.  I want BT to stay alive and succeed.  My business counts on its service.  Many individuals and a whole Burlington entrepreneurial community counts on BT.   It is a great service and hopefully will save money in the long term.  

However, that said, if it goes belly-up, I cannot afford the $1,000 it may cost each taxpayer in the city.

Finally, like the Decommissioning Fund at VY, which I first wrote about in my November 2007 white-paper, corporations must be responsible to take care of their own messes, and not leave it to taxpayers.  For example, my latest review of VY's decommissioning fund shows the possibility of a loss of $1,000 for every man, woman, and child in VT.  It is for that reason I believe filling the decommissioning fund is the right choice for true fiscal conservatives in VT, not only for the environmentalists.  I have never understood why Jim Douglas doesn't support topping up VY's decommissioning fund.  Wow can you imagine the tax shortfall?

I am sure the Naysayers will jump in and criticize my statements here, but I stand by them.  We are a small state.  We need companies like FairPoint, BT, and Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee do what they are required to do and do it fairly.  Our Department of Public Service is the people's advocate and should be responding as such in all these cases.  According to letters on file, DPS has known since 2008 that the BT loan is outstanding.


[ Parent ]
What I was not addressing ... (0.00 / 0)
is the legal issues surrounding the loan from Burlington to Burlington Telecom. That was without a doubt the wrong way to go about funneling tax dollars to BT.

What I addressed was the simple fact that bringing modern day communications to Vermont is going to take public money. Whether or not we should be funneling tax dollars to private corporations for use in expanding our communications infrastructure is a different issue(side note: I vote no on this).

Burlington Telecom has had a rocky, but not unsuccessful, start for sure. Whether it's something in the business plan itself or a result of management decisions or the typical travails of a start up business ... that's for another discussion too. (I do know the city council summarily rejected the promise of central Vermont subscribers, however, and so I tend to think management and political decisions have hampered the effort more than anything else ... my opinion.) I don't know if your $1,000 is really at risk or not.

I do know that there is risk in moving forward, and there is risk in doing nothing ... nobody can avoid that. It may be your $1,000 would be even more at risk if Burlington Telecom had never come about (higher municipal and personal costs, less job creation, all those little diddies that crawl under the umbrella of economic development ... without which you could end up paying more in taxes to fund the same government).

It's about community ... RAMABAHAMA DOT NET (only it is still under construction ... isn't that life?)


[ Parent ]
Surprise!!! (4.00 / 1)
Oh, wait, um, NOT.

At the state level, opponents to the acquisition expressed concern that FairPoint can't afford to spend the more than $2 billion for Verizon's lines, but the commission said, "We reject the commenters' claims that FairPoint lacks the financial qualifications to handle acquiring Verizon's operations in Maine, New Hampshire, and Vermont. While FairPoint would assume a higher level of debt than either of the companies absent the merger, FairPoint represents that it will have adequate cash flows to support its investment plans and service debt...Moreover, FairPoint states that it intends to spend more per line than Verizon has in recent years. Specifically, FairPoint represents that it anticipates making a capital expenditure of at least $100 per access line per year in the three states for the five years following the merger closing date...While it is difficult to calculate the exact amount per access line that will be required to maintain and improve service quality and broadband availability, we take comfort in FairPoint's representation that this level of investment will serve as a significant step in reaching those goals."

Surely, no one could have anticipated that Fairpoint would go bankrupt in the near term as a result of incurring massive debts.

Beware the Everyday Brutality of the Averted Gaze


hope (3.00 / 1)
I hope that BT manages to climb out of its current hole and can become an entity to, at some point, replace comcast or fairpoint as Vermont's communications provider.  

When you wake up each morning look around you.  It might be the last time you get to do it.  

Don't forget the CEO's got theirs first (3.50 / 2)
For a job well done?
Two FairPoint executives received more than $100,00 in performance bonuses it was announced in May .
The two top executives at troubled FairPoint Communications customers received performance-based bonuses recently at roughly the same time that the company was being lambasted over its poorly-executed system cutover in New England.
FairPoint Chairman and CEO Gene Johnson received an $83,862 bonus and a 30 percent raise in 2008, according to an SEC filing, while FairPoint President Peter Nixon accepted a $50,000 bonus. Other executives also were reported to have received raises.

The bonuses appeared to be directly connected to the acquisition itself, and Johnson reportedly made less in compensation for 2008 than he did in 2007.

Read more: http://www.fiercetelecom.com/s...


Maggie, am I to understand that Verizon owns more than 50% of Fairpoint? (4.00 / 1)
I'm referring to "Under a Reverse Morris Trust, a parent corporation can spin-off a subsidiary into an
unrelated company, tax free, if the shareholders of the parent end up controlling
more than 50% of the voting rights and economic value of the resulting merged
company."

And in other news:


A small telecommunications company buys rural landlines from Verizon. Its computer systems fail, causing major headaches for customers, many of whom switch carriers. The company charges toward bankruptcy.

. . .

Hawaiian Telcom, a subsidiary of the global investment firm The Carlyle Group, bought more than 500,000 lines in 2005. The group filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in a Delaware court Dec. 1. Its creditors are set to vote on a reorganization plan by theof the month.


(In Hawaii, echoes of FairPoint ; Company bought Verizon lines, faltered, AllBusiness.com, 10/20/09)

Seems the same routine is getting ready to play out in West Virginia now.

It's about community ... RAMABAHAMA DOT NET (only it is still under construction ... isn't that life?)


Part of my answer to myself ... (4.00 / 1)
"In order to effect the merger describe above, the Company [meaning Fairpoint] issue 53,760,623 shares to Verizon stockholders for their interest in Spinco [the Verizon spinoff created to effect the Reverse Morris Trust]. Accoringly, the number of common shares ...."
Fairpoint SEC filing

So my initial questions still stand regards Verizon control/ownership, but now I'd also like to know how much debt Verizon added to Spinco that was a direct benefit to Verizon and Verizon's shareholders (that reaped the benefits of the sale and any proceeds thereof and acquired absolutely no risk in receiving the new Spinco/Fairpoint stocks).

It's about community ... RAMABAHAMA DOT NET (only it is still under construction ... isn't that life?)


[ Parent ]
Contributing Editors:
Caoimhin Laochdha
Christian Avard
greenvtster
JDRyan
mataliandy
NanuqFC

Front Pager Emeriti:
Kagro X
Vermonter







GMD Links
Vermont Daily Briefing
Rational Resistance
VT News Guy
VT Digger
Minor Heresies
What's the Point?
Vermont Yankee, evacuation plans, & more
Mulish Behavior
Political Animal (with Steve Benen)
Reason and Brimstone
Blazing Indiscretions
sneigwh
Dohiyi Mir
Blier Watch
five before chaos
Blue Hampshire
Blue News Tribune
Burlington Pol
Norsehorse
Rip & Read
Integral Psychosis
VT Secession
She's Right (conservative)
VT Bloggernaut
Morgan's Gov. race blog
Bureaucracy Blog
Austanspace

National

Congress Matters
Daily Kos
Open Left
BlogPac
Talking Points Memo
My Left Wing
MyDD
Docudharma
Glenn Greenwald
Firedoglake
Atrios (Eschaton)
Think Progress
Driftglass
Pam's House Blend
Hullabaloo (Digby)
The Plum Line (Sargent)

Legacy Media Blogs

Vermont View
vt buzz
Blurt (7 Days)

Non-political

Candleblog
iBrattleboro
WKVT 1490 AM
Vermont Mornings
False 45th
Bosox Wally
Welcome Campground
Yorick Lives
The Sap is Running

International

The Irish Independent
Comment is free...(Guardian UK)
Al Jazeera
Pulse Media
Global Voices
All Voices
Vermonters for a Just Peace in Israel/Palestine
About GMD   Contact Us

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

Search




Advanced Search


Active Users
Currently 6 user(s) logged on.

    follow the 50SBN on Twitter




    Specialized Feeds:

    Google Reader or Homepage
    Add to My Yahoo!
    Subscribe with Bloglines
    Subscribe in NewsGator Online

    Add to My AOL
    Subscribe in Rojo
    R|Mail
    Add to Technorati Favorites!


    RSS FEED





    Powered by: SoapBlox